The association between prior percutaneous coronary intervention and short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, patients are being referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for management of symptoms after prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, we assessed the impact of prior PCI on inhospital mortality after CABG. METHODS: Perioperative data were collected on patients who underwent first-time CABG at 2 surgical centers. Patients who underwent PCI and CABG during the same admission were excluded. Patients with prior PCI were compared with patients with no prior PCI, and the risk-adjusted impact of prior PCI on inhospital mortality after CABG was determined using both multivariate techniques and propensity score matching techniques. RESULTS: Six thousand thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with prior PCI were less likely to be between the ages of 70 and 80 (P < .0001), to have an ejection fraction <0.40 (P < .0001), and to have 3-vessel/left main disease (P < .0001). They were, however, more likely to have Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV symptoms (P < .0001) and to have an urgent status (P = .02). Rates of inhospital mortality after CABG were higher in patients with prior PCI (3.6% vs 2.3%, P = .02). Using multivariate techniques, prior PCI emerged as an independent predictor of postoperative inhospital mortality (odds ratio 1.93, P = .003). When patients with prior PCI were matched to patients with no prior PCI using propensity scores, inhospital mortality remained higher among patients with prior PCI (3.6% vs 1.7%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior PCI presented for CABG with less comorbidity and diminished coronary disease; yet, they had more advanced symptoms and greater urgency. After adjusting for these differences, prior PCI emerged as an independent predictor of inhospital mortality after CABG.

Pulmonary artery to distal bypass for surgery on the descending thoracic aorta.

A variety of extracorporeal techniques have been described in surgery of the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. We describe an operative approach involving the cannulation of the pulmonary artery for venous drainage in 12 patients undergoing descending thoracic aortic surgery. In-hospital mortality was 17%; there were no in-hospital deaths for elective cases. There were no cases of post-operative paraplegia. Cannulation of the pulmonary artery is a safe and technically simple means of providing venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass in aortic surgery. This is an effective approach to distal perfusion in aortic surgery that is associated with excellent flows and avoids cannulating the left side of the heart.

Training residents in mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: The safety of training residents in complex procedures has not been elucidated. In particular, the impact of resident-performed mitral valve surgery on patient outcomes is unknown. METHODS: All mitral valve procedures performed by residents between 1998 and 2003 were compared with those performed by staff surgeons. Operative mortality and a composite morbidity (reoperation for bleeding, myocardial infarction, infection, stroke, or ventilation > 24 hours) were compared using multivariate analysis. Individual outcomes were compared with the use of propensity scores. RESULTS: There were 1020 cardiac surgeries performed by residents, including 165 mitral valve procedures (86 replacements, 79 repairs). In the same period, the staff surgeons performed 261 mitral procedures. Crude operative mortality for isolated mitral procedures was 5.4% and 4.7% (resident and staff, respectively, p = 1.00). Mitral valve repair including combined procedures had an operative mortality of 3.8% and 4.3% (resident and staff, respectively, p = 1.00). The composite morbidity outcome was 29.7% and 35.3% for resident and staff-performed cases, respectively (p = 0.24). In multivariate analysis, resident was not associated with the adverse outcomes examined (OR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.47, 1.37). The incidence of major adverse outcomes for propensity score-matched mitral valve cases, including combined procedures, were similar between residents and staff, respectively: mortality, 7.4% versus 8.7% (p = 0.67), stroke, 4.0% versus 6.7% (p = 0.30), and reoperation for bleeding, 4.7% versus 9.4% (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery between resident and staff surgeons. It is possible to train residents to perform complex cardiac cases without adversely affecting outcomes.