The Who, What, and Where of Primary TKAs: An Analysis of HCUP Data from 2009 to 2015.

The aim of this study was to assess (1) temporal trends, (2) primary indication, (3) patient-level demographics (age, race, gender, health status, and median income quartile), and (4) region and hospital type for all patients receiving primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2009 and the third quarter of 2015. The National Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) was used to identify all patients who underwent a TKA between 2009 and the third quarter of 2015. Regression analysis was utilized to assess trends. Chi-square analysis was used to explore categorical variables whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used to explore nonparametric continuous variables. TKA utilization increased between 2009 and 2015 with the highest volume occurring during the fall. Primary osteoarthritis was the primary indication in 98% of cases. There was an increase in minority representation among recipients. Black TKA recipients were younger and had lower median age-adjusted Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI). Black recipients were most likely to be of the lowest 25% of median income than any other races. The Midwest demonstrated the greatest increase in TKAs performed per 100,000 between 2009 and 2014. Case volumes shifted to urban teaching hospitals between 2009 and 2014. There were differences in age of presentation, preoperative morbidity, and income status among races. Furthermore, our findings revealed a more rapid growth in TKA procedures per 100,000 in the Midwest, in addition to volume shifts toward urban teaching hospitals. Future studies are needed to update our findings as well as explore trends in racial disparities for primary TKA recipients.

Dialysis Is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Perioperative Complications in TKA Patients after Adjusting for Pertinent Confounders.

With a growing prevalence for chronic renal failure, arthroplasty surgeons will find it more likely to have dialysis dependent patients present for knee replacement. Previous retrospective studies using a matched cohort of patients have reported worse perioperative outcomes for dialysis-dependent patients. However, many of these studies failed to control for pertinent confounders. This study aims to fill in that void. The present study compares lengths of stay, discharge status, and 30-day outcomes between dialysis-dependent TKA recipients and a matched cohort of nondialysis dependent TKA recipients. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify the study cohorts. Patients were propensity score matched based on patient-specific demographic variables, preoperative functional status, and preoperative laboratory values. Generalized regression models were conducted to assess the effects of dialysis dependency on perioperative outcomes. Dialysis dependent patients demonstrated longer mean lengths of stay (+1.14) and a lower likelihood for home discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 0.503). There was no increased risk of 30-day complications in dialysis dependent TKA patients. Our findings demonstrate no increased risk of 30-day complications after TKA when adjusting for pertinent confounders. This suggests TKA is safe for well optimized dialysis dependent patients prior to surgery.

Are There Gender Differences Among Leaders of Regional Orthopaedic Societies of the United States?

BACKGROUND: Great efforts are currently being made toward improving gender and racial equity in orthopaedic surgery in the United States. Nonetheless, no research has reported on whether these efforts have increased representation of women and underrepresented minorities in leadership roles in orthopaedic surgery societies. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Are women proportionally represented in the leadership of regional orthopaedic societies in the United States? METHODS: The latest version of the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons census data was evaluated to determine the numbers (and percentages) of women and men practicing orthopaedic surgery in the United States. We also queried data for regional orthopaedic societies members who held a position of leadership (four societies; n = 53) between 2012 and 2017. Collected data included gender, years of experience, and practice setting. A chi-square analysis was conducted to compare the percentage of women in leadership with the percentage of women in practice in each of four geographic regions (Western Orthopaedic Association [WOA]; Southern Orthopaedic Association [SOA]; Eastern Orthopaedic Association [EOA]; Mid-America Orthopaedic Association [MAOA]) to see if the representation of women was proportional to that of men. RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no difference in the observed-to-expected proportions between men and women in leadership in any of the regional societies we studied For the eastern region, there were 6% (392 of 6514) versus 0% (0 of 12; p = 0.591) of practicing women orthopaedic surgeons versus women orthopaedic surgeons holding positions in EOA leadership. For the Western region, there were 5% (304 of 5744) versus 7% (1 of 14; p = 0.836) practicing women orthopaedic surgeons versus women orthopaedic surgeons holding positions in WOA leadership. For the Midwest United States region, there were 6% (443 of 6937) versus 0% (0 of 15; p = 0.509) of practicing women orthopaedic surgeons versus women orthopaedic surgeons holding positions in MAOA leadership. For the Southern United States region, there were 4% (443 of 9601) versus 0% (0 of 13; p = 0.662) of practicing women orthopaedic surgeons versus women orthopaedic surgeons holding positions in SOA leadership. CONCLUSIONS: We found that women were represented in leadership roles in the regional societies in the United States in proportion to their overall numbers. However, that overall number was small, and so the percentages of regional society leaders who were women were correspondingly small. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The low number of women orthopaedic surgeons holding leadership positions in regional societies are most likely a function of the low overall number of women orthopaedic surgeons, but focused efforts to change the status quo may increase the diversity of leadership in these societies.

Treatment of Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures With Proximal Femur Locked Plating.

OBJECTIVES: To report on our results using a proximal femoral locking plate for the treatment of peritrochanteric femur fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Level I Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight patients with 68 fractures. INTERVENTION: Demographics, fracture morphology, preoperative imaging, rationale against nailing, and outcomes were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were grouped into no complication, minor complication, or major complication. Minor complications included healed fractures with implant failure or change in alignment from immediate postoperative radiographs, which did not require intervention or elective implant removal. Major complications included any case that required revision for nonunion or implant failure. RESULTS: Nine patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 59 fractures, 16 had complications (27%): 9 minor and 7 major. Active tobacco use (P = 0.020) and fractures with an associated intracapsular femoral neck component (P = 0.006) correlated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal femoral locking plates continue to be associated with a high complication rate. However, based on our experience, proximal femoral locking plates may be considered in highly selected cases when absolutely no other implant is deemed appropriate, based on the degree of comminution and the complexity of the fracture pattern. Patients must be informed about the possibility of revision surgery based on the inherent limitations of these devices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bundled payments in total joint arthroplasty and spine surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this manuscript is to provide an overview and analysis of bundled payment models for joint replacement and select spine procedures. Advantages and disadvantages of bundled payment models will be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: In select populations, bundled payment models have been shown to reduce costs while maintaining satisfactory outcomes. These models have not been tested with complex patient cohorts, such as older adults with fragility hip fractures, and limited data exist with bundled payment analysis in spine procedures. The reduction of healthcare costs, satisfactory patient outcomes, and favorable payments to healthcare systems can be achieved through bundled payments. Modifications of existing bundled payment models should be critically tested prior to implementation across higher risk populations. Bundled payment models will also require healthcare systems to define what services are necessary for an episode of care regarding a specific condition or disease.