RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may negatively impact the care of liver transplant candidates and recipients. MAIN BODY OF THE ABSTRACT: Accordingly, each country must have its national guidelines based on the current situation and according to available tools. Liver Transplantation Scientific Committee of Waiting List Project in Egypt was established in 13 April 2020. One of the major objectives of this Scientific Committee is the preparation of national protocol for Transplant Centers in Egypt to deal with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The protocol highlights basic hospital requirements for LDLT during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the patient selection from the waiting list, management of patients on the waiting list, and post-transplant management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43066-020-00074-4.
RESUMO
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a valuable option for expanding the donor pool, especially in localities where deceased organ harvesting is not allowed. In addition, rejection rates were found to be lower in LDLT, which is attributed to the fact that LDLT is usually performed between relatives. However, the impact of genetic relation on the outcome of LDLT has not been studied. In this study, we examined the difference in rejection rates between LDLT from genetically related (GR) donors and genetically unrelated (GUR) donors. All cases that underwent LDLT during the period from May 2004 until May 2014 were included in the study. The study group was divided into 2 groups: LDLT from GR donors and LDLT from GUR donors. A total of 308 patients were included in the study: 212 from GR donors and 96 from GUR donors. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing was not included in the workup for matching donors and recipients. GUR donors were wives (36; 11.7%), sons-in-law (7; 2.3%), brothers-in-law (12; 3.9%), sisters-in-law (1; 0.3%), and unrelated (38; 12.3%). The incidence of acute rejection in the GR group was 17.4% and 26.3% in the GUR group (P value = 0.07). However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of chronic rejection (CR) between the 2 groups: 7% in GR group and 14.7% in the GUR group (P value = 0.03). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between both groups. LDLT from the GUR donors is not associated with a higher incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, CR was significantly lower when grafts were procured from GR donors. HLA matching may be recommended before LDLT from GUR donors. Liver Transplantation 23:43-49 2017 AASLD.
Assuntos
Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/genética , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Doença Hepática Terminal/mortalidade , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/genética , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Antígenos HLA/análise , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplantados , Resultado do Tratamento , Doadores não RelacionadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of concomitant caudate lobe resection in the course of major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY: During the period between January 1995 and December 2010, 159 patients were subjected to major hepatectomy with or without total caudate lobe resection at the Gastroenterology Centre, Mansoura University. These patients were divided in two groups: 1) a caudate lobe preservation (CLP) group (79 patients) and 2) a caudate lobe resection (CLR) group (80 patients). All patient data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: This study included 94 men and 65 women with a mean age of 53.5±0 years without operative mortality. No differences were observed between groups regarding operative time, blood loss or the development of any individual postoperative complication. There were 23 (28.8%) margin-positive resections in the CLR group and 49 (62%) margin-positive resections in the CLP group (p≤0.001). Recurrence was confirmed in 53 (67.1%) and in 41(51.3%) patients in the CLP and CLR groups, respectively (p=0.031). The median survival of the CLR group was 36 months with a 5-year survival rate of 28%, while the median survival of the CLP group was 22 months with a 5-year survival rate of 5% (p≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Caudate lobe resection in combination with major hepatectomy did not affect operative or postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, it led to higher rates of margin-negative resections and significantly improved survival.
