Prognosis of Cardiac Arrest-Peri-arrest and Post-arrest Considerations.

There has been only a small improvement in survival and neurologic outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest in recent decades. Type of arrest, length of total arrest time, and location of arrest alter the trajectory of survival and neurologic outcome. In the post-arrest phase, clinical markers such as blood markers, pupillary light response, corneal reflex, myoclonic jerking, somatosensory evoked potential, and electroencephalography testing can be used to help guide neurological prognostication. Most of the testing should be performed 72 hours post-arrest with special considerations for longer observation periods in patients who underwent TTM or who had prolonged sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade.

A Pulse Check on Leadership and Teamwork: An Evaluation of the First 5 Minutes of Emergency Department Resuscitation During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrests.

OBJECTIVES: Effective leadership and teamwork are imperative during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR). The initial phase of pediatric CPR, termed the "first 5 minutes," has significant care delivery gaps in both leadership and team performance. The aim of the study was to describe the performance data of emergency department (ED) teams who performed CPR in a pediatric ED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective video review of resuscitations involving pediatric patients younger than 21 years who presented in cardiac arrest to a tertiary pediatric ED. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Twenty events met study inclusion criteria. Prearrival task completion included the following: estimated weight (90%), airway set-up (85%), epinephrine dose prepared (84%), defibrillator ready (75%), and intraosseous kit ready (50%). Median prearrival notification time was 5 minutes 34 seconds (interquartile range = 4:44-7:13) with no significant relationship between prearrival time and task completion. Within the first 5 minutes, the team leader provided a care summary in 84%, prioritized tasks in 95%, and assigned roles for airway management (90%), intravenous/intravenous access (63%), and CPR/pulse check (63%). Most critical tasks were completed within 1 minute; however, only 25% had defibrillator pads placed within the 5-minute window. CONCLUSIONS: Our study of leadership and teamwork during the first 5 minutes of pediatric CPR care noted wide variation in team performance. Opportunities for improvements in CPR readiness can be incorporated into education and quality programs to drive improvements in the care of future pediatric patients experiencing cardiac arrest.

Videographic Assessment of the Quality of EMS to ED Handoff Communication During Pediatric Resuscitations.

BACKGROUND: The National Association of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physicians emphasizes the importance of high quality communication between EMS providers and emergency department (ED) staff for providing safe, effective care. The Joint Commission has identified ineffective handoff communication as a contributing factor in 80% of serious medical errors. The quality of handoff communication from EMS to ED teams for critically ill pediatric patients needs further exploration. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the quality of handoff communication between EMS and ED staff during pediatric medical resuscitations. METHODS/DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of video recordings of pediatric patients who required critical care ("resuscitation") in the ED between January 2014 and February 2016 at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. Handoff quality between EMS and emergency department teams was assessed for completeness, timeliness, and efficiency. Institutional review board approval was obtained. RESULTS: Sixty-eight resuscitations were reviewed; 28% presented in cardiac arrest, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Completeness of information communicated was variable and included chief complaint (88%), prehospital interventions (81%), physical exam findings (63%), medical history (59%), age (56%), and weight (20%). Completeness of specific vital sign reporting included: respiratory rate (53%), heart rate (43%), oxygen saturation (39%), and blood pressure (31%). Timeliness of communication included median patient handoff and report times of 50 seconds [IQR 30,74] and 108 seconds [IQR 62,252], respectively. Inefficient communication occurred in 87% of handoffs, including interruptions by ED staff (51%), questions from the ED physician team leader asking for information already communicated (40%), and questions by ED physician team leader requesting information not yet communicated (65%). When comparing non-CPR to CPR cases, only timeliness of patient handoff was significantly different for those patients receiving prehospital CPR. CONCLUSION: Handoff communication between EMS and ED teams during pediatric resuscitation was frequently incomplete and inefficient. Future educational and quality improvement interventions could aim to improve the quality of handoff communication for this patient population.