The risk factors for the failure of hook wire localization of ground glass nodules prior to thoracoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively analyse the potential influencing factors of CT-guided hook wire localization failure prior to thoracoscopic resection surgery of ground glass nodules (GGNs), and determine the main risk elements for localization failure. METHODS: In all, 372 patients were included in this study, with 21 patients showing localization failure. The related parameters of patients, GGNs, and localization were analysed through univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors of localization failure. RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that trans-fissure (odds ratio [OR] 4.896, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.489-13.939); trans-emphysema (OR 3.538, 95% CI 1.343-8.827); localization time (OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.898-1.019); multi-nodule localization (OR 2.597, 95% CI 1.050-6.361); and pneumothorax (OR 10.326, 95% CI 3.414-44.684) were risk factors for localization failure, and the p-values of these factors were < 0.05. However, according to the results of multivariate analysis, pneumothorax (OR 5.998, 95% CI 1.680-28.342) was an exclusive risk factor for the failure of preoperative localization of GGNs. CONCLUSION: CT-guided hook wire localization of GGNs prior to thoracoscopic surgery is often known to fail; however, the incidence is low. Pneumothorax is an independent risk factor for failure in the localization process.

Quantitative CT comparison between COVID-19 and mycoplasma pneumonia suspected as COVID-19: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare imaging features between COVID-19 and mycoplasma pneumonia (MP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of patients with mild COVID-19 and MP who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) examination from February 1, 2020 to April 17, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The Pneumonia-CT-LKM-PP model based on a deep learning algorithm was used to automatically quantify the number, volume, and involved lobes of pulmonary lesions, and longitudinal changes in quantitative parameters were assessed in three CT follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients with mild COVID-19 and 13 patients with MP were included in this study. There was no difference in lymphocyte counts at baseline between the two groups (1.43 ± 0.45 vs. 1.44 ± 0.50, p = 0.279). C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in MP group than in COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). The number, volume, and involved lobes of pulmonary lesions reached a peak in 7-14 days in the COVID-19 group, but there was no peak or declining trend over time in the MP group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the longitudinal changes of quantitative CT, pulmonary lesions peaked at 7-14 days in patients with COVID-19, and this may be useful to distinguish COVID-19 from MP and evaluate curative effects and prognosis.

A computed tomography-based nomogram to predict pneumothorax caused by preoperative localization of ground glass nodules using hook wire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a CT-based nomogram to predict the occurrence of loculated pneumothorax due to hook wire placement. METHODS: Patients (n = 177) were divided into pneumothorax (n = 72) and non-pneumothorax (n = 105) groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build a clinical prediction model using significant predictors identified by univariate analysis of imaging features and clinical factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was applied to evaluate the discrimination of the nomogram, which was calibrated using calibration curve. RESULTS: Based on the results of multivariable regression analysis, transfissure approach [odds ratio (OR): 757.94; 95% confidence interval CI (21.20-27099.30) p < 0.0001], transemphysema [OR: 116.73; 95% CI (12.34-1104.04) p < 0.0001], localization of multiple nodules [OR: 8.04; 95% CI (2.09-30.89) p = 0.002], and depth of nodule [OR: 0.77; 95% CI (0.71-0.85) p < 0.0001] were independent risk factors for pneumothorax and were included in the predictive model (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve value for the nomogram was 0.95 [95% CI (0.92-0.98)] and the calibration curve indicated good consistency between risk predicted using the model and actual risk. CONCLUSION: A CT-based nomogram combining imaging features and clinical factors can predict the probability of pneumothorax before localization of ground-glass nodules. The nomogram is a decision-making tool to prevent pneumothorax and determine whether to proceed with further treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A nomogram composed of transfissure, transemphysema, multiple nodule localization, and depth of nodule has been developed to predict the probability of pneumothorax before localization of GGNs.

Comparison of CT-guided localization using hook wire or coil before thoracoscopic surgery for ground glass nodules.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two kinds of metal markers for preoperative localization of ground glass nodules (GGNs). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated data from 198 cases of GGN localization and compared the success rate and complications of both approaches. RESULTS: In the hook wire and coil groups, the success rates of CT-guided localization for GGNs were 99.2 and 98.7%, respectively (p = 1.000). The success rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in both groups were 100% without transthoracic surgery. The post-localization complication rates in the hook wire group and coil group were 36.9 and 32.9% (p = 0.568), and the postoperative complication rates in the hook wire and coil groups were 13.9 and 11.8%, respectively (p = 0.672). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative localization of GGNs with both hook wire and coil methods proved to be useful and effective. Both methods have acceptable preoperative and postoperative complication rates, but the localization and operation times were shorter for the hook wire group than the coil group. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Most of previous articles studied a single preoperative localization method. Few studies have compared the preoperative and postoperative methods for metal markers. This paper compared two preoperative localization methods for GGNs to provide clinical guidance.