Segment selection for fusion and artificial disc replacement in the hybrid surgical treatment of noncontiguous cervical spondylosis: a finite element analysis.

Introduction: The treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disease (CDD) with no degenerative changes observed in the intervening segment (IS) is complicated. This research aims to provide a reference basis for selecting treatment approaches for noncontiguous CDD. Methods: To establish accurate finite element models (FEMs), this study included computed tomography (CT) data from 21 patients with CDD (10 males and 11 females) for modeling. The study primarily discusses four cross-segment surgical approaches: upper (C3/4) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and lower (C5/6) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), FA model; upper CDA (C3/4) and lower ACDF (C5/6), AF model; upper ACDF (C3/4) and lower ACDF (C5/6), FF model; upper CDA (C3/4) and lower CDA (C5/6), AA model. An initial axial load of 73.6 N was applied at the motion center using the follower load technique. A moment of 1.0 Nm was applied at the center of the C2 vertebra to simulate the overall motion of the model. The statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 14.0. Statistical significance was defined as a p value less than 0.05. Results: The AA group had significantly greater ROM in flexion and axial rotation in other segments compared to the FA group (p < 0.05). The FA group consistently exhibited higher average intervertebral disc pressure in C2/3 during all motions compared to the AF group (p < 0.001); however, the FA group displayed lower average intervertebral disc pressure in C6/7 during all motions (p < 0.05). The AA group had lower facet joint contact stresses during extension in all segments compared to the AF group (p < 0.05). The FA group exhibited significantly higher facet joint contact stresses during extension in C2/3 (p < 0.001) and C6/7 (p < 0.001) compared to the AF group. Discussion: The use of skip-level CDA is recommended for the treatment of non-contiguous CDD. The FA construct shows superior biomechanical performance compared to the AF construct.

Biomechanical effects of hybrid constructions in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid construction (HC) may be an ideal surgical strategy than noncontinuous total disc replacement (TDR) and noncontinuous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy. However, there is still no consensus on the segmental selection for ACDF or TDR in HC. The study aims to analyse the effects of different segment selection of TDR and ACDF on cervical biomechanical characteristics after HC surgery. METHODS: Twelve FEMs of C2-C7 were constructed based on CT images of 12 mild cervical spondylopathy volunteers. Two kinds of HC were introduced in our study: Fusion-arthroplasty group (Group 1), upper-level (C3/4) ACDF, and lower-level TDR (C5/6); Arthroplasty-fusion group (Group 2), upper-level (C3/4) TDR and lower-level ACDF (C5/6). The follow-load technique was simulated by applying an axial initial load of 73.6 N through the motion centre of FEM. A bending moment of 1.0 Nm was applied to the centre of C2 in all FEMs. Statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS 26.0. The significance threshold was 5% (P < 0.05). RESULTS: In the comparison of ROMs between Group 1 and Group 2, the ROM in extension (P = 0.016), and lateral bending (P = 0.038) of C4/5 were significantly higher in Group 1 group. The average intervertebral disc pressures at C2/3 in all directions were significantly higher in Group 1 than those in Group 2 (P < 0.005). The average contact forces in facet joints of C2/3 (P = 0.007) were significantly more than that in Group 2; however, the average contact forces in facet joints of C6/7 (P < 0.001) in Group 1 group were significantly less than that in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty-fusion is preferred for intervertebral disc degeneration in adjacent upper segments. Fusion-arthroplasty is preferred for patients with lower intervertebral disc degeneration or lower posterior column degeneration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900020513).

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Behavior of Pelvic Incidence After Different Posterior Spinal Procedures in Elderly Patients With Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the behavior of pelvic incidence (PI) after different posterior spinal procedures in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), to determine the potential associated factors with the variability in PI after spinal surgery and to comprehensively analyze its mechanisms. METHODS: Elderly patients underwent long fusion to sacrum with and without pelvic fixation were assigned to Group L+P and Group L-P, respectively. In Group L-P, those with severe sagittal deformity were selected as Group A. 20 elderly patients with severe sagittal deformity underwent short lumbar fusion were included as Group B. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), and pelvic parameters. PI changing more than 5° (△PI > 5°) was considered as substantially changed. RESULTS: For the whole cohort and in Group L+P, PI were not substantially changed (△PI ≤ 5°) after surgery. Besides the severer sagittal malalignment in patients with △PI > 5° in Group L-P, relatively larger mean age, greater proportion of female and lower preoperative PI were found than those in patients with △PI ≤ 5°. 70.8% of patients had substantial increase of PI in Group A, while only 10% of patients had in Group B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PI behaves differently under different conditions in elderly ASD patients. Besides severe sagittal deformity, aging, female and low preoperative PI are also the potential risk factors of PI increasing after long fusion to sacrum.

Development and validation of a risk prediction score for the severity of acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis (AHTGP) is increasing worldwide. AHTGP may be associated with a more severe clinical course and greater mortality than pancreatitis caused by other causes. Early identification of patients with severe inclination is essential for clinical decision-making and improving prognosis. Therefore, we first developed and validated a risk prediction score for the severity of AHTGP in Chinese patients. AIM: To develop and validate a risk prediction score for the severity of AHTGP in Chinese patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including 243 patients with AHTGP. Patients were randomly divided into a development cohort (n = 170) and a validation cohort (n = 73). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression were used to screen 42 potential predictive variables to construct a risk score for the severity of AHTGP. We evaluated the performance of the nomogram and compared it with existing scoring systems. Last, we used the best cutoff value (88.16) for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to determine the risk stratification classification. RESULTS: Age, the reduction in apolipoprotein A1 and the presence of pleural effusion were independent risk factors for SAP and were used to construct the nomogram (risk prediction score referred to as AAP). The concordance index of the nomogram in the development and validation groups was 0.930 and 0.928, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrate excellent agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities in SAP patients. The area under the curve of the nomogram (0.929) was better than those of the Bedside Index of Severity in AP (BISAP), Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI), and early achievable severity index scores (0.852, 0.825, 0.807, 0.831 and 0.807, respectively). In comparison with these scores, the integrated discrimination improvement and decision curve analysis showed improved accuracy in predicting SAP and better net benefits for clinical decisions. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine risk stratification classification for AHTGP by dividing patients into high-risk and low-risk groups according to the best cutoff value (88.16). The high-risk group (> 88.16) was closely related to the appearance of local and systemic complications, Ranson score ≥ 3, BISAP score ≥ 3, MCTSI score ≥ 4, APACHE II score ≥ 8, C-reactive protein level ≥ 190, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The nomogram could help identify AHTGP patients who are likely to develop SAP at an early stage, which is of great value in guiding clinical decisions.

Does the sagittal spinal profile differ between the elderly Chinese populations with and without lumbar disc herniation?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the characteristics of the sagittal spinopelvic profile in the elderly Chinese population with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and to evaluate its influence on the severity, location and number of disc degeneration. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 212 elderly Chinese patients with LDH and 213 asymptomatic volunteers with matched age and sex. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters were measured on the full-length X-ray and the sagittal profiles were determined according to the Roussouly classification. The severity, location and number of lumbar disc degeneration were evaluated from the L12 to L5S1 discs on the MRI images. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in BMI between the two groups. Patients with LDH were found to have significantly smaller TK, LL, and SS than those in the asymptomatic population (P < 0.05), while contradicting observations were obtained of PT and TPA (P < 0.05). In the LDH group, Roussouly type 1 and type 2 (50.4% and 28.7%, respectively) were predominant and the proportion of type 1 in the elderly LDH population was further increased compared to the younger LDH population. LDH population with Roussouly type 1 and 2 showed more caudal herniated locations and fewer herniated numbers than those with type 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: The sagittal spinopelvic profile was significantly different between the elderly Chinese population with and without LDH. There were significant differences in the Roussouly distribution between the elderly and the younger groups and different Roussouly types have different effects on the lumbar disc degeneration patterns.

Different degeneration patterns of paraspinal muscles in degenerative lumbar diseases: a MRI analysis of 154 patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the different degeneration patterns of paraspinal muscles in degenerative lumbar diseases and their correlation with lumbar spine degeneration severity. The degeneration characteristics of different paraspinal muscles in degenerative lumbar diseases remain unclear. METHODS: 78 patients diagnosed with single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and 76 patients with degenerative lumbar kyphosis (DLK) were included as DLS and DLK groups. Paraspinal muscle parameters of psoas major (PS), erector spinae (ES) and multifidus muscle (MF) were measured, including fatty infiltration (FI) and relative cross-sectional area (rCSA), namely the ratio of the paraspinal muscle CSA to the CSA of the vertebrae of the same segment. Sagittal parameters including lumbar lordosis (LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. The paraspinal muscle parameters and ES/MF rCSA ratio were compared between the two groups. Paraspinal muscles parameters including rCSA and FI were also compared between each segments from L1 to L5 in both DLS and DLK groups. In order to determine the influence of sagittal spinal alignment on paraspinal muscle parameters, correlation analysis was conducted between the MF, ES, PS rCSA and FI and the LL in DLS and DLK group. RESULT: MF atrophy is more significant in DLS patients compared with DLK. Also, MF fatty infiltration in the lower lumbar spine of DLS patients was greater compared to DLK patients. DLK patients showed more significant atrophy of ES and heavier ES fatty infiltration. MF FI was significantly different between all adjacent segments in both DLS and DLK groups. In DLS group, ES FI was significantly different between L2/L3 to L3/L4 and L4/L5 to L5/S1, while in DLK group, the difference of ES FI between all adjacent segments was not significant, and ES FI was found negatively correlated with LL. CONCLUSIONS: Paraspinal muscles show different degeneration patterns in degenerative lumbar diseases. MF degeneration is segmental in both DLS and DLK patients, while ES degenerated diffusely in DLK patients and correlated with the severity of kyphosis. MF degeneration is more significant in the DLS group, while ES degeneration is more significant in DLK patients. MF is the stabilizer of the lumbar spine segments, while the ES tends to maintain the spinal sagittal balance.

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score.

BACKGROUND: To achieve the proper sagittal alignment, previous studies have developed different assessment systems for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) which could help the spine surgeon in making treatment strategies. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether Roussouly classification or global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is more appropriate in the prediction of mechanical complications after surgical treatment of ADS. METHODS: ADS patients who received long segmental fusion in the treatment during the period from December 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated in this study. Basic information and radiologic measurements were collected for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to occurrence or absence of mechanical complications for comparison. Mechanical complications included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF). GAP categories divided GAP score into proportioned spinopelvic position, moderately disproportioned position, and severely disproportioned position according to the cut-off values. The correlation between evaluation systems and mechanical complications was analyzed through a logistic regression model via stepwise backward elimination based on the Wald statistics. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predictability of the evaluation systems in the occurrence of mechanical complications and calculate their cut-off value. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the validity of the thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included in this study. There were 41 patients in mechanical complication group and 39 patients in no mechanical complication group. GAP score (P = 0.008) and GAP categories (P = 0.007) were positively correlated with mechanical complications; Roussouly score was negatively correlated with mechanical complications (P = 0.034); GAP score was positively correlated with PJK (P = 0.021); Roussouly score was negatively correlated with implant-related complications (P = 0.018); GAP categories were correlated with implant loosening (P = 0.023). Results of ROC showed that GAP score was more effective in predicting PJK (AUC = 0.863) and PJF (AUC = 0.724) than Roussouly score; GAP categories (AUC = 0.561) was more effective than GAP score (AUC = 0.555) in predicting implant-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Roussouly classification could only be a rough estimate of optimal spinopelvic alignment. Quantitative parameters in GAP score made it more effective in predicting mechanical complications, PJK and PJF than Roussouly classification.

The value of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence in the diagnosis of patients with lumbosacral nerve root compression.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted turbo spin-echo SPACE (T2-SPACE) sequence in LNRC. METHODS: A total of 90 surgically confirmed LNRC patients with 165 explored nerve roots were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic values were quantified using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. The consistency between 2D MRI and 3D T2-SPACE MRI was quantified using kappa test. The compression of specific branch in nerve root was evaluated on 2D MRI, 3D T2-SPACE MRI, and surgical findings. The pedicle height, vertebral body height (VH), proximal tilting angle of nerve root (PTA) were measured on MR images. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy by 2D MRI were 78.3%, 72.7%, 94.9%, 34.0%, and 77.6%, respectively. For 3D T2-SPACE MRI imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 91.6%, 86.4%, 97.8%, 61.3%, and 90.9%, respectively. 2D MRI and 3D T2-SPACE MRI for detection of intra-foramen and extra-foramen nerve compression showed poor homogeneity (Kappa = 0.333, Kappa = 0.276, respectively). Smaller VHs and larger PTAs could be indicators for the diagnosis of foraminal nerve root compression. CONCLUSIONS: 3D T2-SPACE MRI had a higher sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy than 2D MRI for detecting LNRC. The 3D T2-SPACE scan could be a good substitute to routine 2D MRI in LNRC diagnosis, especially for foraminal nerve root compression patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The radiographic characteristics and developmental mechanism of the lumbar degenerative retrolisthesis under a high-grade PI.

BACKGROUND: When talking about backward displacement of the vertebra, it generally refers to the retrolisthesis under low pelvic incidence (PI). It is worth to mention that lumbar retrolisthesis could also occur under a high-grade PI. Little knowledge was known about the radiographic characteristics and developmental mechanism of the retrolisthesis under high PI. This study was designed to describe the radiographic features and to explore the developmental mechanism of this type of backward vertebral displacement. METHODS: A total of 887 consecutive subjects from our database were retrospectively reviewed. Degenerative lumbar retrolisthesis was found in 78 patients, including 54 patients with a relative low-grade PI (Group L) and 24 patients with a relative high-grade PI (Group H). 60 subjects without lumbar spondylolisthesis were randomly selected as the control group. Clinical and radiologic data were collected and compared between different groups. RESULTS: 91.4% of patients in Group H had the type 4 sagittal construction in terms of Roussouly classification, while 92.6% of patients in Group L had the type 1 sagittal construction. The distribution of retrolisthesis was found about two vertebrae higher with larger backward slope in Group H than Group L. Compared with the control, patients with retrolisthesis under high PI had significantly greater thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), PI, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis, T1 pelvic angle and severer disc degeneration and facet arthritis. Logistic regression analysis showed TLK was the independent factor predicting the development of retrolisthesis under a high-grade PI. CONCLUSIONS: Retrolisthesis under a high-grade PI and type 4 sagittal construction had higher location and larger backward slope than retrolisthesis under a low-grade PI. Retrolisthesis under high PI might be primarily associated with the increased backward sliding forces at the hypertilted vertebra in large TLK segment and lumbar instability caused by disc degeneration and facet arthritis.

Dynamic Stabilization Adjacent to Fusion versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

This study evaluated differences in outcome variables between dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion (DATF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane was performed. The variables of interest included clinical adjacent segment pathologies (CASPs), radiological adjacent segment pathologies (RASPs), lumbar lordosis (LL), visual analogue scale (VAS) of back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, duration of surgery (DS), estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and reoperation rate. Nine articles identified as meeting all of the inclusion criteria. DATF was better than PLIF in proximal RASP, CASP, and ODI during 3 months follow-up, VAS-L. However, no significant difference between DATF and PLIF was found in distal RASP, LL, JOA score, VAS-B, ODI after 3 months follow-up, complication rates, and reoperation rate. These further confirmed that DATF could decrease the proximal ASP both symptomatically and radiographically as compared to fusion group; however, the influence of DATF on functional outcome was similar with PLIF. The differences between hybrid surgery and topping-off technique were located in DS and EBL in comparison with PLIF. Our study confirmed that DATF could decrease the proximal ASP both symptomatically and radiographically as compared to the fusion group; however, the influence of DATF on functional outcome was similar with PLIF. The difference between hybrid surgery and topping-off technique was not significant in treatment outcomes.

Topping-Off Technology versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

The treatment effects of topping-off technique were still controversial. This study compared all available data on postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes of topping-off technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed. Variations included radiographical adjacent segment disease (RASD), clinical adjacent segment disease (CASD), global lumbar lordosis (GLL), visual analogue scale (VAS) of back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), reoperation rates, and complication rates. Sixteen studies, including 1372 cases, were selected for the analysis. Rates of proximal RASD (P=0.0004), distal RASD (P=0.03), postoperative VAS-B (P=0.0001), postoperative VAS-L (P=0.02), EBL (P=0.007), and duration of surgery (P=0.02) were significantly lower in topping-off group than those in PLIF group. Postoperative ODI after 3 years (P=0.04) in the topping-off group was significantly less than that in the PLIF group. There was no significant difference in the rates of CASD (P=0.06), postoperative GLL (P=0.14), postoperative ODI within 3 years (P=0.24), and postoperative JOA (P=0.70) and in reoperation rates (P=0.32) and complication rates (P=0.27) between topping-off group and PLIF. The results confirmed that topping-off technique could effectively prevent ASDs after lumbar internal fixation. However, this effect is effective in preventing RASD. Topping-off technique is more effective in improving the subjective feelings of patients rather than objective motor functions compared with PLIF. With the development of surgical techniques, both topping-off technique and PLIF are safe.

Pathological Features and Surgical Strategies of Cervical Deformity.

Cervical deformity (CD) is a kind of disorder influencing cervical alignment. Although the incidence of CD is not high, this deformity can cause not only pain but also difficulties in daily activities such as swallowing and maintaining upright position. Even though the common cause of cervical deformity is still controversial, previous studies divided CD into congenital deformity and secondary deformity; secondary deformity includes iatrogenic and noniatrogenic deformity according to pathogenic factors. Due to the lack of relevant studies, a standardized evaluation for CD is absent. Even though the assessment of preoperative condition and surgical planning mainly rely on personal experience, the evaluation methods could still be summarized from previous studies. The objective in this article is to summarize studies on cervical scoliosis, identify clinical problems, and provide directions for researchers interested in delving deep into this specific topic. In this review, we found that the lack of standard classification system could lead to an absence of clinical guidance; in addition, the osseous landmarks and vascular distributions could be variable in CD patients, which might cause the risk of vascular or neurological complications; furthermore, multiple deformities were usually presented in CD patients, which might cause chain reaction after the correction of CD; this would prevent surgeons from choosing realignment surgery that is effective but risky.

Different acute behaviors of pelvic incidence after long fusion to sacrum between elderly patients with severe and minor sagittal deformity: a retrospective radiographic study on 102 cases.

PURPOSE: To compare the acute behaviors of pelvic incidence (PI) between elderly adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with severe and minor sagittal deformity based on SRS-Schwab classification and to identify the mechanism of the variability in PI after long fusion to S1. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or above with available radiographs were included. The following parameters were measured pre- and postoperatively: Thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), PI-LL and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were found with severe sagittal deformity were assigned to Group S, and 60 patients with minor sagittal deformity were assigned to Group M. Immediately after surgery, lumbar curve, TLK and PI-LL were obviously corrected in both groups, while LL, PI, SVA and TPA were significantly increased in Group S alone. PI was significantly increased from 42.6 ± 4.7° to 51.7 ± 6.0° in Group S (P = 0.002), but changed from 45.4 ± 10.2° to 46.3 ± 10.3° in Group M without statistical significance. Pearson correlation analysis showed changes in PI was significantly correlated with changes in SVA (r = 0.415, P = 0.011) in patients with PI increased more than 5°. CONCLUSION: PI spontaneously increases in elderly ASD patients with severe sagittal deformity after long fusion to sacrum, while is relative invariable in those with minor sagittal deformity. Variation in PI could be considered as a secondary change compensating for the spinal sagittal malalignment under long spinal fusion in elderly patients.

Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical characteristics of noncontinuous ACDF and noncontinuous CDA in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease were still unclear. The aim of this research is to compare the differences between these two kinds of treatment methods and to verify the effectiveness of Prodisc-C in noncontinuous CDA. METHODS: Eight FEMs of the cervical spine (C2-C7) were built based on CT images of 8 mild CDDD volunteers. In the arthroplasty group, we inserted Prodisc-C at C3/4 and C5/6. In the fusion group, CoRoent® Contour and NuVasive® Helix ACP were implanted at C3/4 and C5/6. Initial loads of 75 N were used to simulate the head weight and muscle forces. The application of 1.0 N m moment on the top on the C2 vertebra was used to create motion in all directions. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The IDPs in C2/3 (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, P < 0.001, P < 0.001), C4/5 (P < 0.001), and C6/7 (P < 0.001) of the intact group were significantly less than that in the fusion group in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. In addition, the IDPs in C2/3 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001), C4/5 (P < 0.001), and C6/7 (P < 0.001) of the arthroplasty group were significantly less than that in the fusion group in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. Contact forces of facet joints in C2/3 (P = 0.010) in the arthroplasty group was significantly less than that in the intact group. Contact forces of facet joints in C2/3 (P < 0.001), C4/5 (P < 0.001), and C6/7 (P < 0.001) in the arthroplasty group was significantly less than that in the fusion group. Contact forces of facet joints in C2/3 (P < 0.001), C4/5 (P < 0.001), and C6/7 (P < 0.001) in the intact group were significantly less than that in the fusion group. CONCLUSIONS: Noncontinuous CDA could preserve IDP and facet joint forces at the adjacent and intermediate levels to maintain the kinematics of cervical spine near preoperative values. However, noncontinuous ACDF would increase degenerative risks at adjacent and intermediate levels. In addition, the application of Prodisc-C in noncontinuous CAD may have more advantages than that of Prestige LP.

Comparison between topping-off technology and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The difference between topping-off technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in postoperative outcomes is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare all available data on outcomes of topping-off technique and PLIF in the treatment of chronic low back pain. METHODS: Articles in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were reviewed. Parameters included radiographical adjacent segment disease (RASD), clinical adjacent segment disease, range of motion (ROM), global lumbar lordosis (GLL), visual analog scale (VAS), visual analog scale of back, (VAS-B) and visual analog scale leg (VAS-L), Oswestry disability index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), reoperation rates, complication rates. RESULTS: Rates of proximal RASD (P = .001) and CASD (P = .03), postoperative VAS-B (P = .0001) were significantly lower in topping-off group than that in PLIF group. There was no significant difference in distal RASD (P = .07), postoperative GLL (P = .71), postoperative upper intervertebral ROM (P = .19), postoperative VAS-L (P = .08), DOI (P = .30), postoperative JOA (P = .18), EBL (P = .21) and duration of surgery (P = .49), reoperation rate (P = .16), complication rates (P = .31) between topping-off group and PLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Topping-off can effectively prevent the adjacent segment disease from progressing after lumbar internal fixation, which is be more effective in proximal segments. Topping-off technique was more effective in improving subjective feelings of patents rather than objective motor functions. However, no significant difference between topping-off technique and PLIF can be found in the rates of complications.

The ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope is an effective parameter for the selection of posterior surgical approach for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, laminectomy with fusion (LCF) and laminoplasty alone (LP) are both effective posterior surgical approaches for decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, which one is suitable for patients has no standard answer. This study estimated whether the ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope (CL/T1S) could be an indication of posterior surgical approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up who underwent LCF or LP. Radiological measurements, including C2-C7 Cobb angle, decompressed Cobb angle, T1 slope, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and curvature index (CI), and clinical outcomes, including Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analogue scale were evaluated. ROC curve analysis was used to identify discriminative power of CL/T1S ratio to predict kyphotic deformity and severe lordosis loss. The t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to evaluate the difference between LCF and LP. Kruskal-Wallis H - test and ANOVA were used to evaluate the difference among different ratio CL/T1S groups. RESULTS: The cervical lordosis decreased after LCF or LP (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Based on ROC curve analysis, CL/T1S ratio had a good discriminative power to predict kyphotic deformity and severe lordosis loss (AUC = 0.70, AUC = 0.88, respectively). According to CI value changes, cervical lordosis losses in group LP were larger than that in group LCF (p = 0.006). However, there was no significant difference in CI changes of fair-ratio CL/T1S group between LCF and LP. For patients with low CL/T1S ratio or high CL/T1S ratio, CI changes in group LP were greater than that in group LCF (p = 0.037, p = 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CL/T1S ratio could be an indication of posterior surgical approach. Compared with LP, LCF reduces postoperative cervical lordosis losses in low-ratio and high-ratio CL/T1S groups.

A new lever reduction technique for the surgical treatment of elderly patients with lumbar degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Proper reduction method for Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of lever reduction combined with traditional elevating-pull reduction technique for the treatment of elderly patients with LDS. METHODS: From May 2015 to December 2017, 142 elderly patients (≥65 years) diagnosed with LDS were enrolled in this study with a mean follow-up of 25.42 ± 8.31 months. All patients were operated using lever reduction combined with traditional elevating-pull reduction technique. Patient age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density, preoperative comorbidities, surgical duration, blood loss, and surgical complications were collected form patient charts. Clinical data as visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were collected preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Radiographic evaluation included slip percentage, slip angle (SA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and fusion status. RESULTS: The clinical parameters of VASback, VASleg, ODI, and SF-36 had significantly improved at both follow-ups after surgery. A significant improvement was indicated for slippage reduction at both follow-ups, showing no significant correction loss after surgery. SA significantly increased after surgery and was well maintained at the final follow-up. LL was not affected by the surgery. At the final follow-up, complete fusion was obtained in 121 patients (85.2%) and partial fusion in 21 (14.8%). Revision surgery was performed for one patient. Screw loosening was observed in 3 (2.11%) cases. No nerve root injury or adjacent segment disease was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This new lever reduction combined with traditional elevating-pull reduction technique for the surgical treatment of elderly patients with LDS is both safe and effective. Satisfactory correction and fusion rates were achieved with acceptable correction loss and reduction-related complications.

Correlation between multifidus muscle atrophy, spinopelvic parameters, and severity of deformity in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis: the parallelogram effect of LMA on the diagonal through the apical vertebra.

BACKGROUND: There were several reports describing the biomechanics and microstructure of multifidus muscles in patients with lumbar disc herniation. However, correlations between lumbar multifidus muscle atrophy (LMA), spinopelvic parameters, and severity of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) have not been investigated. The study evaluated the impact of LMA and spinopelvic parameters on the severity of ADS. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with ADS were retrospectively reviewed. Standing whole-spine X-ray was used to evaluate the coronal (coronal Cobb angle, CA; coronal vertical axis, CVA) and sagittal (sagittal vertical axis, SVA; thoracic kyphosis, TK; lumbar lordosis, LL; pelvic incidence, PI; pelvic tilt, PT; sacral slope, SS) parameters. LMA was evaluated on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at intervertebral levels above and below the vertebra at the apex of the scoliotic curve. Clinical symptoms were evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Multiple linear regression was used to assess correlations between LMA, spinopelvic parameters, and severity of scoliosis. RESULTS: LL and PT were negatively correlated with CA (P < 0.001); LL was positively correlated with SVA (P < 0.001). PI was positively correlated with CA (P < 0.001) and CVA (P < 0.001). PT (P < 0.001) and SS (P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with CVA. SS was negatively correlated with SVA (P < 0.001). Concave LMA at the upper or lower intervertebral level of the apical vertebra was positively correlated with CA (P ≤ 0.001); convex LMA at the upper or lower intervertebral level was negatively correlated with CA (P < 0.001). Convex LMA at the upper intervertebral level and concave LMA at the lower intervertebral level of the apical vertebra were negatively correlated with the SVA (P ≤ 0.001). At the upper intervertebral level, LMA on the concave side was positively correlated with CVA (P = 0.028); LMA on the convex side was negatively correlated with CVA (P = 0.012). PI was positively correlated with ODI (P < 0.001); PT (P < 0.001) and SS (P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with ODI. At the lower intervertebral level, LMA on the concave side was positively correlated with ODI (P = 0.038); LMA on the convex side was negatively correlated with ODI (P = 0.011). PI was positively correlated with JOA (P < 0.001); PT (P < 0.001) and SS (P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with JOA. CONCLUSIONS: Spinopelvic parameters are correlated with the severity of ADS. Asymmetric LMA at both upper and lower intervertebral levels of the apical vertebra is positively correlated with CA. LMA on the diagonal through the apical vertebra is very important to maintain sagittal imbalance via parallelogram effect. LMA at lower intervertebral levels of the apical vertebra may have a predictive effect on ODI. JOA score seems to be more correlated with spinopelvic parameters than LMA.

Comparison of the French and CARDS classifications for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: reliability and validity.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of the CARDS and French classification systems for lumbar DS. METHODS: Between May 2013 and December 2016, 158 consecutive patients diagnosed with single-level lumbar DS were included in this study, and all underwent lumbar fusion. All patients underwent long-cassette standing anterioposterior and lateral radiographs of the spine preoperatively and postoperatively. The images were graded according to the CARDS and French classification systems by two orthopedic spinal surgeons and two orthopedic spinal fellows, independently. Clinical outcome measures used were the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Clinical data were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were finally included in this study and followed up for at least 1 year. When grading using the CARDS system, the κ values for inter- and intraobserver reliability were 0.837 and 0.869, respectively, representing perfect agreement. The interobserver κ value for the French classification was 0.693 and the intraobserver κ value was 0.743, both representing substantial agreement. CARDS Type D patients have higher preoperative back pain scores and better improvement after surgery compared with non-Type D patients. Mean back and leg pain was worse in French Type 5 patients, while the most significant improvement was also seen in Type 5 patients after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both CARDS and French classification systems have acceptable reliability and validity. The CARDS system is easier to utilize and has better reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Predictors of L4-L5 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: L4 Inclination Angle and Facet Joint Angle.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and the L4 inclination angle (IA) and evaluate the risk factors of DLS. METHODS: Ninety patients with L4-L5 DLS and 90 with L4-L5 lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis (control group) were compared. Parameters including L4 IA, facet joint angle (FJA), cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscle, Pfirrmann grading of intervertebral disc, and degeneration grading of facet joint (FJ) were evaluated. The Student t tests and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of DLS. RESULTS: Statistical differences were found in L4 IA, cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle, FJA, and degeneration grading of FJ between 2 groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.07, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that greater L4 IA (ß: -0.186, P < 0.001), more sagittal FJ (ß: -0.117, P < 0.001), and more severe degeneration of FJ (ß: -1.033, P < 0.001) were both significant predictors of DLS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with L4 IA greater than 11.15° and FJA greater than 60.19° are more likely to occur DLS.