Assessing ChatGPT's ability to emulate human reviewers in scientific research: A descriptive and qualitative approach.

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT is an AI platform whose relevance in the peer review of scientific articles is steadily growing. Nonetheless, it has sparked debates over its potential biases and inaccuracies. This study aims to assess ChatGPT's ability to qualitatively emulate human reviewers in scientific research. METHODS: We included the first submitted version of the latest twenty original research articles published by the 3rd of July 2023, in a high-profile medical journal. Each article underwent evaluation by a minimum of three human reviewers during the initial review stage. Subsequently, three researchers with medical backgrounds and expertise in manuscript revision, independently and qualitatively assessed the agreement between the peer reviews generated by ChatGPT version GPT-4 and the comments provided by human reviewers for these articles. The level of agreement was categorized into complete, partial, none, or contradictory. RESULTS: 720 human reviewers' comments were assessed. There was a good agreement between the three assessors (Overall kappa >0.6). ChatGPT's comments demonstrated complete agreement in terms of quality and substance with 48 (6.7 %) human reviewers' comments, partially agreed with 92 (12.8 %), identifying issues necessitating further elaboration or recommending supplementary steps to address concerns, had no agreement with a significant 565 (78.5 %), and contradicted 15 (2.1 %). ChatGPT comments on methods had the lowest proportion of complete agreement (13 comments, 3.6 %), while general comments on the manuscript displayed the highest proportion of complete agreement (17 comments, 22.1 %). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT version GPT-4 has a limited ability to emulate human reviewers within the peer review process of scientific research.

Increased Postoperative Opioid Consumption in the Presence of Co-administration of 5-HT3 Antagonists with Acetaminophen: A Hospital Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen and 5-hydroxytryptamine-type-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are administered as standard prophylaxes for postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Preclinical studies however suggest that 5-HT3 antagonists may compromise acetaminophen's analgesic effect. This hospital registry study investigates whether 5-HT3 antagonists mitigate the analgesic effect of prophylactic acetaminophen in a perioperative setting. METHODS: This study included 55,016 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for ambulatory procedures at a tertiary healthcare center in Massachusetts, United States of America, from 2015 to 2022. Using binary exposure variables and a comprehensive selection of pre-planned patient- and procedure-related covariates for confounder control, we investigated whether intraoperative 5-HT3 antagonists affected the association between pre- or intraoperative acetaminophen and postoperative opioid consumption, gauged by opioid dose in mg oral morphine equivalents (OME) administered in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). A multivariable, zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was applied. RESULTS: 3,166 (5.8%) patients received only acetaminophen, 15,438 (28.1%) only 5-HT3 antagonists, 31,850 (57.9%) both drugs, and 4,562 (8.3%) neither drug. The median PACU opioid dose was 7.5 mg OME (interquartile range 7.5 to 14.3 mg OME) among 16,640/55,016 (30.3%) patients who received opioids and the average opioid dose was 3.2 mg OME across all patients (maximum cumulative dose: 20.4 mg OME). Acetaminophen administration was associated with a 5.5% (95%CI -9.6% to -1.4%;p=0.009; adjusted absolute difference -0.19 mg OME;95%CI -0.33 to -0.05;p=0.009) reduction in opioid consumption among patients who did not receive a 5-HT3 antagonist, while there was no effect in patients who received a 5-HT3 antagonist (adjusted absolute difference 0.00 mg OME; 95%CI -0.06 to 0.05;p=0.93,p-for-interaction=0.012). CONCLUSION: A dose-dependent association of pre- or intraoperative acetaminophen with decreased postoperative opioid consumption was not observed when 5-HT3 antagonists were co-administered, suggesting that physicians might consider reserving 5-HT3 antagonists as rescue medication for postoperative nausea or vomiting when acetaminophen is administered for pain prophylaxis.

Consensus guidelines for the perioperative management of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Deep sedation without tracheal intubation (monitored anaesthesia care) and general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are commonly used anaesthesia techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There are distinct pathophysiological differences between monitored anaesthesia care and general anaesthesia that need to be considered depending on the nature and severity of the patient's underlying disease, comorbidities, and procedural risks. An international group of expert anaesthesiologists and gastroenterologists created clinically relevant questions regarding the merits and risks of monitored anaesthesia care vs general anaesthesia in specific clinical scenarios for planning optimal anaesthetic approaches for ERCP. Using a modified Delphi approach, the group created practical recommendations for anaesthesiologists, with the aim of reducing the incidence of perioperative adverse outcomes while maximising healthcare resource utilisation. In the majority of clinical scenarios analysed, our expert recommendations favour monitored anaesthesia care over general anaesthesia. Patients with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration and those undergoing prolonged procedures of high complexity were thought to benefit from general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. Patient age and ASA physical status were not considered to be factors for choosing between monitored anaesthesia care and general anaesthesia. Monitored anaesthesia care is the favoured anaesthesia plan for ERCP. An individual risk-benefit analysis that takes into account provider and institutional experience, patient comorbidities, and procedural risks is also needed.

The association of nitrous oxide on length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: To assess whether intraoperative use of nitrous oxide (N2O) as an adjunct to general anesthesia is associated with a shorter length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: We analyzed data from adult patients who underwent non-cardiothoracic surgery under general anesthesia between May 2008 and December 2018. We assessed the association between intraoperative low- and high-dose N2O and PACU length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 148,284 patients were included in the primary analysis. After adjusting for a priori defined confounders, a high dose of N2O significantly decreased PACU length of stay, with a calculated difference of -9.1 min (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.5 to -7.7; P < 0.001). Patients who received high-dose N2O had a lower incidence of both short- and prolonged-duration of intraoperative hypotension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.88; P < 0.001 and aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively) and received a lower total intraoperative vasopressor dose (-0.04 mg of norepinephrine equivalents; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01; P = 0.01). The effect of high-dose N2O on PACU length of stay was modified by surgical complexity (adjusted absolute difference: -26.1 min; 95% CI, -29.2 to -23.1; P < 0.001; P for interaction < 0.001), and most pronounced in patients who underwent complex surgery and received intraoperative antiemetic therapy (adjusted absolute difference: -38.9 min; 95% CI, -43.1 to -34.6; P < 0.001; P for interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nitrous oxide was dose-dependently associated with a decreased PACU length of stay. The effect was clinically relevant (> 30 min difference) in patients who underwent complex surgical procedures and received intraoperative antiemetic therapy.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer si l'utilisation peropératoire de protoxyde d'azote (N2O) en complément à l'anesthésie générale était associée à une durée de séjour écourtée en salle de réveil (SDR). MéTHODE: Nous avons analysé les données de patients adultes qui ont subi une chirurgie non cardiothoracique sous anesthésie générale entre mai 2008 et décembre 2018. Nous avons évalué l'association entre une faible dose et une dose élevée de N2O peropératoire et la durée du séjour en SDR. RéSULTATS: Au total, 148 284 patients ont été inclus dans notre analyse primaire. Après ajustement tenant compte des facteurs de confusion définis a priori, une dose élevée de N2O a considérablement écourté la durée du séjour en salle de réveil, avec une différence calculée de −9,1 min (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −10,5 à −7,7 ; P < 0,001). Chez les patients ayant reçu une dose élevée de N2O, l'incidence d'hypotension peropératoire de courte ou plus longue durée était plus faible (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCA], 0,85; IC 95 %, 0,83 à 0,88; P < 0,001 et RCA, 0,76; IC 95 %, 0,73 à 0,80; P < 0,001, respectivement); en outre, ces patients ont reçu une dose totale de vasopresseurs peropératoires inférieure (−0,04 mg d'équivalents de norépinéphrine; IC 95 %, −0,06 à −0,01; P = 0,01). L'effet d'une dose élevée de N2O sur la durée du séjour en SDR a été modifié par la complexité de la chirurgie (différence absolue ajustée : −26,1 min; IC 95 %, −29,2 à −23,1; P < 0,001; P pour l'interaction < 0,001), et était le plus prononcé chez les patients ayant subi une chirurgie complexe et reçu un traitement antiémétique peropératoire (différence absolue ajustée : −38,9 min; IC 95 %, −43,1 à −34,6; P < 0,001; P pour l'interaction < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Le protoxyde d'azote a été associé de façon dose-dépendante à une réduction de la durée du séjour en SDR. L'effet était cliniquement pertinent (différence > 30 minutes) chez les patients qui subissaient des interventions chirurgicales complexes et recevaient un traitement antiémétique peropératoire.

Association between preoperative administration of gabapentinoids and 30-day hospital readmission: A retrospective hospital registry study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative gabapentinoid administration. DESIGN: Retrospective hospital registry study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center (Boston, MA). PATIENTS: 111,008 adult non-emergency, non-cardiac surgical patients between 2014 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative administration of gabapentinoids (gabapentin or pregabalin). MEASUREMENTS: We tested the primary hypothesis that preoperative gabapentinoid use was associated with lower odds of hospital readmission within 30 days. Contingent on this hypothesis, we examined whether lower intraoperative opioid utilization mediated this effect. Secondary outcome was postoperative respiratory complications. MAIN RESULTS: Gabapentinoid administration was associated with lower odds of readmission (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 0.80 [95% CI, 0.75-0.85]; p < 0.001). This effect was in part mediated by lower intraoperative opioid utilization in patients receiving gabapentinoids (8.2% [2.4-11.5%]; p = 0.012). Readmissions for gastrointestinal disorders (ORadj 0.74 [0.60-0.90]; p = 0.003), neuro-psychiatric complications (ORadj 0.66 [0.49-0.87]; p = 0.004), non-surgical site infections (ORadj 0.68 [0.52-0.88; p = 0.004) and trauma or poisoning (ORadj 0.25 [0.16-0.41]; p < 0.001) occurred less frequently in patients receiving gabapentinoids. The risk of postoperative respiratory complications was lower in patients receiving gabapentinoids (ORadj 0.77 [0.70-0.85]; p < 0.001). Lower doses of pregabalin (< 75 mg) and gabapentin (< 300 mg) compared to both, no and high-dose administration of gabapentinoids, were associated with a lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications (ORadj 0.61 [0.50-0.75]; p < 0.001 and ORadj 0.70 [0.53-0.92]; p = 0.012, respectively). These lower gabapentinoid doses prevented 30-day readmission (ORadj 0.74 [0.65-0.85]; p < 0.001). The results were robust in several sensitivity analyses including surgical procedure defined subgroups and patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative use of pregabalin and gabapentin, up to doses of 75 and 300 mg respectively, mitigates the risks of hospital readmission and postoperative respiratory complications which can in part be explained by lower intraoperative opioid use. Further research is warranted to elucidate mechanisms of the preventive action.

The effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration on length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit in ambulatory surgery: A hospital registry study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Dexmedetomidine, which is commonly used for procedural sedation and as adjunct to general anesthesia for ambulatory procedures, may affect patient discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We hypothesized that intraoperative dexmedetomidine use in ambulatory surgery is associated with delayed discharge from the PACU and that this is modified by surgical duration and anesthesia type. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: 130,854 adult patients undergoing ambulatory surgery between 2008 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was PACU length of stay. In secondary and exploratory analyses, we examined dose-dependency, effect modification by duration of surgery and anesthesia type, effects of timing of dexmedetomidine administration, and PACU discharge delays. MAIN RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine was associated with a prolonged PACU length of stay (adjusted absolute difference [ADadj] 15.0 min; 95%CI 12.7-17.3; p < 0.001). This effect was dose-dependent (p-for-trend < 0.001), magnified in surgeries of less than one hour (ADadj 20.7 min; 95%CI 16.7-24.7; p < 0.001) and in patients undergoing monitored anesthesia care compared to general anesthesia (ADadj 16.8 min; 95%CI 14.1-19.6; p < 0.001). The effect was more pronounced if dexmedetomidine was administered within the last 60 min of surgery (ADadj 18.7 min; 95%CI 15.7-21.7; p < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine was associated with discharge delays due to cardiovascular complications (ORadj 2.27; 95%CI 1.59-3.24; p < 0.001) and over-sedation (ORadj 1.28; 95%CI 1.11-1.48; p < 0.001). In patients who received dexmedetomidine (n = 2901), the use of bolus doses only versus the combination of bolus and infusions, magnified the effects on PACU length of stay (ADadj 29.5 min per µg/kg; 95%CI 17.3-41.8 versus 18.1 min per µg/kg; 95%CI 11.4-24.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine was dose-dependently associated with a prolonged PACU length of stay. Clinicians should judiciously titrate dexmedetomidine, especially when using this long-acting drug for monitored anesthesia care for shorter procedures.

Outcomes after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with general anaesthesia versus sedation.

BACKGROUND: We tested the primary hypothesis that use of general anaesthesia vs sedation increases vulnerability to adverse discharge (in-hospital mortality or new discharge to a nursing facility) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients undergoing ERCP with general anaesthesia or sedation at a tertiary care hospital were included. We calculated adjusted absolute risk differences between patients receiving general anaesthesia vs sedation using provider preference-based instrumental variable analysis. We also used mediation analysis to determine whether intraoperative hypotension during general anaesthesia mediated its effect on adverse discharge. RESULTS: Among 17 538 patients undergoing ERCP from 2007 through 2018, 16 238 received sedation and 1300 received GA. Rates of adverse discharge were 5.8% (n=938) after sedation and 16.2% (n=210) after general anaesthesia. Providers' adjusted mean predicted probabilities of using general anaesthesia for ERCP ranged from 0.2% to 63.2% of individual caseloads. Utilising provider-related variability in the use of general anaesthesia for instrumental variable analysis resulted in an 8.6% risk increase (95% confidence interval, 4.5-12.6%; P<0.001) in adverse discharge among patients receiving general anaesthesia vs sedation. Intraoperative hypotensive events occurred more often during general anaesthesia and mediated 23.8% (95% confidence interval, 3.9-43.7%: P=0.019) of the primary association. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that use of sedation during ERCP facilitates reduced adverse discharge for patients for whom general anaesthesia is not clearly indicated. Intraoperative hypotension during general anaesthesia for ERCP partly mediates the increased vulnerability to adverse discharge.

BOSTN Bundle Intervention for Perioperative Screening and Management of Patients With Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Hospital Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: We developed and implemented a perioperative guideline for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), comprising a preoperative screening tool (BOSTN) and clinical management pathways. OSA was suspected with 2 or more of the following: body mass index ≥30 kg/m, observed apnea, loud snoring, daytime tiredness, and neck circumference ≥16.5 inches in women or ≥ 17.5 inches in men. The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between high BOSTN scores and the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation after surgery. METHODS: In this hospital registry study, 169,662 noncardiac surgical cases performed at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Boston, MA, between May 2008 and September 2017 were analyzed. We assessed the association between a high BOSTN Score (score ≥2) and the primary outcome of requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation within 7 days after surgery using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for patient-specific factors and case-specific surgical and anesthesiological confounders. Patients with a BOSTN Score ≥2 were assumed to have a high likelihood of suffering from OSA. Key secondary outcome was postoperative desaturation, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation measurement <90% within 10 minutes of extubation. RESULTS: Invasive mechanical ventilation within 7 days of surgery was necessary in 3170 (2.3%) low-risk cases (BOSTN Score <2) and 664 (2.1%) high-risk cases (BOSTN Score ≥2). A score ≥2 was associated with significantly lower odds of requiring postoperative invasive ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.98; P = .017), but with an increased risk of postextubation desaturation (aOR, 1.34; 99.3% CI, 1.21-1.48; P < .001). Patients with a score ≥2 were hospitalized for an average of 3.71 days after surgery, compared to 4.27 days with a score <2 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.87; 99.3% CI, 0.84-0.91; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk of OSA required postoperative mechanical ventilation less frequently, had higher odds of postoperative desaturation, and were hospitalized for shorter periods of time.

A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of anesthesiologist-administered sedation for monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP, limited prospective data exist on the effectiveness, safety, and cost of this approach. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs), patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with SRAEs, and endoscopist and patient satisfaction with anesthesiologist-administered sedation. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 528 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesiologist-administered MAC or general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: SRAEs, endoscopist and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 120 intraprocedure SRAEs during 109 of the 528 ERCPs (21% of cases). Intraprocedure SRAEs included hypotension (38 events), arrhythmia (20 events), O(2) desaturation to less than 85% (66 events), unplanned intubation (16 events), and procedure termination (1 event). Thirty postprocedure SRAEs occurred in a total of 22 patients (4% of cases), including hypotension (5 events), endotracheal intubation (2 events), and arrhythmia (12 events). Patient-related variables associated with adverse intraprocedure events were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .004) and body mass index (kg/m(2)) (P = .02). On a 10-point scale, mean endoscopist satisfaction with sedation was 9.2 (standard deviation 1.8) and patient satisfaction with sedation was 9.9 (standard deviation 0.7). LIMITATIONS: The approach to sedation was not randomized. CONCLUSIONS: Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and body mass index are associated with an increased rate of cardiac and respiratory events during ERCP. Cardiac and respiratory events are generally minor, and MAC can be considered a safe option for most ERCP patients. Despite the frequency of minor sedation-related events, procedure interruption or premature termination was rare in the setting of anesthesiologist-administered sedation.

Continuous perioperative insulin infusion decreases major cardiovascular events in patients undergoing vascular surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence suggests that hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of increased cardiovascular risk. Aggressive glycemic control in the intensive care decreases mortality. The benefit of glycemic control in noncardiac surgery is unknown. METHODS: In a single-center, prospective, unblinded, active-control study, 236 patients were randomly assigned to continuous insulin infusion (target glucose 100-150 mg/dl) or to a standard intermittent insulin bolus (treat glucose > 150 mg/dl) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular bypass, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or below- or above-knee amputation. The treatments began at the start of surgery and continued for 48 h. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and acute congestive heart failure. The secondary endpoints were blood glucose concentrations, rates of hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dl) and hyperglycemia (> 150 mg/dl), graft failure or reintervention, wound infection, acute renal insufficiency, and duration of stay. RESULTS: The groups were well balanced for baseline characteristics, except for older age in the intervention group. There was a significant reduction in primary endpoint (3.5%) in the intervention group compared with the control group (12.3%) (relative risk, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.83; P = 0.013). The secondary endpoints were similar. Hypoglycemia occurred in 8.8% of the intervention group compared with 4.1% of the control group (P = 0.14). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that continuous insulin infusion was a negative independent predictor (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.87; P = 0.027), whereas previous coronary artery disease was a positive predictor of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Continuous insulin infusion reduces perioperative myocardial infarction after vascular surgery.

Crew resource management and team training.

This article reviews medical team training using the principles of crew resource management (CRM). It also briefly discusses crisis resource management, a subset of CRM, as applied to high-acuity medical situations. Guidelines on setting up medical team training programs are presented. Team training programs are classified and examples of simulation-based and classroom-based programs are offered and their merits discussed. Finally, a brief look at the future of team training concludes this review article.

Four cases of cardiopulmonary thromboembolism during liver transplantation without the use of antifibrinolytic drugs.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is one of the most demanding surgical procedures performed. Intraoperative bleeding can be substantial and related to both surgical and nonsurgical causes. A less common but previously reported phenomenon is intraoperative cardiopulmonary thromboembolism precipitating major patient morbidity and mortality. In this paper, we present four cases of intraoperative thromboembolism during OLT. These cases were performed without the concomitant use of antifibrinolytic drugs. We performed a review and analysis of previously reported cases of intraoperative thromboembolism during OLT. Possible causes of thromboembolism, clinical management, use of thromboelastography, and the role of antifibrinolytic drugs are discussed.