Oral D-methionine protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in humans: phase 2 randomized clinical trial in India.

Objective: This exploratory Phase 2 clinical trial is the first determining safety and efficacy of oral D-methionine (D-met) in reducing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.Design: Randomised parallel double-blind placebo-controlled exploratory Phase 2 study.Study samples: Fifty adult cancer patients received oral D-met or placebo before each cisplatin dose. Physical examination, blood collection and audiometry occurred at baseline and subsequent visits plus post-treatment audiometry. After attrition, final analysis included 27 patients.Results: Significant treatment group by ear and time (baseline vs. post-treatment) interactions occurred at 10 kHz and 11.2 kHz. Placebo and D-met groups differed in threshold shift for left ear at 11.2 kHz (mean difference = 22.97 dB [9.59, 36.35]). Averaging across ears, placebo group showed significant threshold shifts from baseline to post-treatment at 10 kHz (mean shift= -13.65 dB [-21.32,-5.98]), 11.2 kHz (-16.15 dB [-25.19,-7.12]), and 12.5 kHz (-11.46 dB [-19.18,-3.74]) but not 8 kHz (-8.65 dB [-17.86, 0.55]). The D-met group showed no significant threshold shifts (8 kHz: -1.25 dB [-7.75, 5.25]; 10 kHz:-3.93 dB [-8.89, 1.03]; 11.2 kHz:-4.82 dB [-11.21, 1.57]; 12.5 kHz:-3.68 dB [-11.57, 4.21]). Side effects did not significantly differ between groups.Conclusion: Oral D-met reduces cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in humans.

Double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter phase II trial to evaluate D-methionine in preventing/reducing oral mucositis induced by radiation and chemotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to test if oral D-methionine (D-met) reduced mucositis during chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase II trial of D-met (100 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) testing the rate of severe (grades 3-4) mucositis. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized. Grade 2 + oral pain was higher with placebo (79% vs 45%; P = .0165), whereas grade 2 + body odor was greater with D-met (3% vs 41%; P = .0015). Mucositis was decreased with D-met by the physician (World Health Organization [WHO], P = .007; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG], P = .009) and patient functional scales (RTOG, P = .0023). The primary end point of grades 3 to 4 mucositis on the composite scale demonstrated a decrease with D-met (48% vs 24%; P = .058), which was borderline in significance. A planned secondary analysis of a semiquantitative scoring system noted decreased oral ulceration (2.2 vs 1.5; P = .023) and erythema (1.6 vs 1.1; P = .048) with D-met. CONCLUSION: Although not meeting the primary end point, results of multiple assessments suggest that D-met decreased mucositis.

Pharmacokinetic analysis and phase 1 study of MRX-1024 in patients treated with radiation therapy with or without cisplatinum for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: A previous study reported radiation protection from mucosal injury with D-methionine (D-met) in preclinical evaluation; therefore, the pharmacokinetics, safety, and utility of D-met were evaluated clinically. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The pharmacokinetics of D-met following oral administration of a bioavailable formulation (MRX-1024) was evaluated in normal volunteers. Subsequently, 25 patients were enrolled on a phase 1 study of MRX-1024 concurrent with radiation therapy (RT) with or without weekly cisplatinum. Toxicity and mucosal events were evaluated weekly. RESULTS: Oral MRX-1024 resulted in rapid and dose-dependent increases in plasma D-met concentrations with a half-life of 3 hours. When administered concurrent with RT without chemotherapy, it was associated with a modest increase in grade 2 (two of six patients) and grade 3 (one of six patients) emesis. In those treated with MRX-1024 along with RT and weekly cisplatinum, there was no appreciable increase in emesis. Overall, five patients withdrew from the study due to emesis (four grade 2 and one grade 3). Only one incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 emesis) was identified in 25 patients (4%). Finally, in 18 evaluable patients treated with MRX-1024 at 100 mg/kg twice daily (BID), the incidence of severe (grade 3) oral mucositis was 6% (1 of 18) with no grade 4 mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dose-dependent increase in D-met exposure following MRX-1024 administration at 50 and 100 mg/kg, and MRX-1024 is safe for use concurrent with combined radiation and chemotherapy. The observed rate of mucositis seems less than that for similar treatment regimens within the published literature.

Evaluation of D-methionine as a novel oral radiation protector for prevention of mucositis.

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a common acute morbidity associated with radiation and/or chemotherapy treatment for cancer. D-Methionine (D-Met), the dextro-isomer of the common amino acid l-methionine, has been documented to protect normal tissues from a diverse array of oxidative insults. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated if D-Met could selectively prevent radiation-induced oral mucositis using in vitro cell culture models as well as an in vivo model of radiation injury to the oral mucosa in C3H mice. RESULTS: Unlike free-radical scavengers, which protected both normal and transformed tumor cells in vitro from radiation-induced cell death, treatment with d-Met in culture protected nontransformed primary human cells from radiation-induced cell death (protective factor between 1.2 and 1.6; P<0.05) whereas it did not confer a similar protection on transformed tumor cells. D-Met treatment also provided significant protection to normal human fibroblasts, but not to tumor cell lines, from radiation-induced loss of clonogenicity (protection factor, 1.6+/-0.15). D-Met treatment did not alter DNA damage (as measured by histone phosphorylation) following irradiation but seemed to selectively mitigate the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in nontransformed cells, whereas it did not provide a similar protection to tumor cells. Tumor control of implanted xenografts treated with radiation or concurrent cisplatin and radiation was not altered by D-Met treatment. Pharmacokinetics following administration of a liquid suspension of D-Met in rats showed 68% bioavailability relative to i.v. administration. Finally, in a murine model of mucositis, a dose-dependent increase in protection was observed with the protective factor increasing from 1.6 to 2.6 over a range of oral D-Met doses between 200 and 500 mg/kg (P<0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: D-Met protected normal tissues, but not tumor cells, in culture from radiation-induced cell death; it also protected normal cells from radiation-induced mucosal injury in a murine model but did not alter tumor response to therapy. Further studies on the use of D-Met to protect from oral mucositis are warranted.

Evaluation of (E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene)cytidine on the 9L rat brain tumor model using MRI.

(E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene)cytidine (FMdC), was evaluated as a potential treatment for malignant gliomas using the rat 9L brain tumor model. FMdC was shown to be an effective inhibitor of cell proliferation in cultured 9L cells with an EC(50) of 40 ng/ml. In vitro studies also revealed that this compound significantly inhibited incorporation of [(3)H]thymidine in 9L cells. In vivo therapeutic efficacy of FMdC was evaluated in rats harboring intracerebral 9L tumors which were treated daily with 15 mg/kg, i.p. Treatment response was quantified from changes in tumor growth rates as assessed from sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor volume measurements. In vivo tumor cell kill in individual animals was calculated by fitting tumor volume data with an iterative computer routine. It was estimated that therapeutically responsive rats treated with FMdC daily produced a >/= 0.1 log kill per therapeutic dose which resulted in a significant reduction in tumor growth rate. In addition, localized (1)H-MRS of intracerebral 9L tumors revealed changes in metabolite levels which correlated with therapeutic response. These results provide evidence supporting the use of FMdC in clinical trials for the treatment of malignant gliomas and reveals that MR can play an important role in the pre-clinical evaluation of novel compounds using orthotopic tumor models.