[The management of syncope in the hospital: the OESIL Study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio)]. / Gestione della sincope in ospedale: lo Studio OESIL (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio).

BACKGROUND: While syncope is generally considered a frequent finding in clinical practice, no clear epidemiological evidence is available about the relevance of such an event in the general population of Italy. METHODS: The OESIL Study was designed and undertaken in 15 hospitals of the Italian region of Latium in order to assess the percentage of emergency-room visits and admissions due to syncope, as well as to analyze the in-hospital diagnostic work-up performed for this condition. RESULTS: During a two-month observation period, 781 (372 males and 409 females, mean age 55.2 (22.8 years) consecutive patients came to the emergency rooms of the 15 hospitals included in the investigation due to a syncope spell (0.9% of emergency room visits); 450/781 patients (57.6%) were subsequently hospitalized (1.3% of all admissions): 48.0% of the admissions were admitted to a general medical ward, 29.3% to an observation ward, 13.3% to a cardiology section, 1.6% to a neurology section and 7.8% to other clinical sections (neurosurgery, general surgery). The mean duration of in-hospital stay was 6.9 (5.8 days; range 1-40 days). During the hospitalization period, 93.1% of patients underwent an ECG, 51.0% an EEG, 44.3% a CT scan of the central nervous system, 40.2% an echocardiogram and 19.5% a tilt-test. The syncope spell was considered to have a cardiovascular origin in 33.8% of the cases and a non-cardiovascular in 11.6% of the cases, while the origin was unknown in 54.4% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Collected data support the idea that syncope represents a frequent event in the general population and is responsible for a significant percentage of emergency-room visits and hospital admissions. However, the performance of conventional diagnostic work-ups is far from being satisfactory.

Acute myocardial infarction: sex-related differences in prognosis.

In 641 patients (535 men and 106 women) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a mortality of 16.63% was recorded among the former and one of 42.45% among the latter. No significant difference was observed in the age groups up to 40 years, in the group from 41 to 55 years, and in those over 71; the difference between percentages (17.09 vs 38.23) was instead statistically significant (p less than 0.01) in patients in the age group from 56 to 70 years. This difference was significant (p less than 0.01 or 0.001) with regard to mortality in diabetics (21.36% vs 46.34%), nondiabetics (13.09% vs 30.36%), hypertensives (19.72% vs 37.70%) and nonhypertensives (12.86% vs 36.11%), as well as in patients with previous infarction (33.36% vs 81.82%) and in those with first infarction (12.18% vs 31.39%). Since this phenomenon does not seem related to any particular feature of infarction nor to a particular predisposition to specific causes of death, the reasons for such severe prognosis in women require clarification.