Let the right one in: High admission rate for low-acuity pediatric burns.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize emergency pediatric burn care triage at a tertiary children's hospital to identify targets for quality improvement. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients <18 years with primary burn injuries who presented to a children's emergency department in 2016 was conducted. Demographic and injury characteristics were recorded. Low acuity was defined by size (<5% total body surface area burn), depth (not third degree), and no need for conscious sedation for debridement. Multiple logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 309 pediatric burn patients were triaged in the emergency department. Patients were typically young (median 3.3 years), male (59%), Hispanic (47%), publically insured (77%), and transferred in (65%). Scalding was the most common mechanism (59%). Though most burns were small (median 2% total body surface area), not deep (

Adherence to the Pediatric Preinduction Checklist Is Improved When Parents Are Engaged in Performing the Checklist.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends including the parents in completion of the pediatric surgical safety checklist. At our hospital, the preinduction surgical safety checklist is conducted in the preoperative holding with anesthesia, nursing, and often with the parents of children undergoing an operative procedure. We hypothesized that adherence to the preinduction checklist is better when parents are engaged in surgical safety checklist performance. METHODS: An observational study of adherence to the preinduction checklist for nonemergent pediatric operations was performed (2016-2017). Adherence was defined as verbalization of checkpoints. Only checkpoints (patient identification, procedure, site marking, weight, allergies, and NPO status) relevant to parental knowledge were evaluated. Parental engagement was based on: positive body language, eye contact, lack of distractions, and understanding of checkpoints. RESULTS: 484 preinduction surgical safety checklists were observed (interrater reliability >0.7). Partial completion occurred in 55% cases; only 41% checklists were fully completed. Parents were present for 81% of checklists, and more checkpoints were performed when parents were present (5, IQR 4-6) versus absent (2, IQR 1-3, P < .001). Increased preinduction adherence was associated with increased parent engagement by linear regression analysis (1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.33). Staff confirmed more checkpoints with engaged parents (28-78%) versus when parents were not engaged (1-9%, P < .001 for all checkpoints). CONCLUSION: Overall preinduction surgical safety checklist performance was poor (less than half of checklists fully completed). In contrast, checklist adherence improved with parental presence and engagement during performance of the checklist.