Prophylaxis of Oral Mucositis with Iodine Solution during Concurrent Chemoradiation of Head and Neck Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an in-house iodine solution (IS) mouthwash for the prophylaxis of concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) induced oral mucositis (OM) in head & neck cancer (HNC) patients. METHODS: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 20 HNC patients, being treated with definite or postoperative CCRT, at the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the treatment group or the control group. Patients in the treatment group gargled IS three times daily after meals, while patients in the control group gargled normal saline solutions (NSS). Assessment of OM was performed before starting CCRT, once a week during CCRT, and 4 weeks after CCRT was completed. The primary outcome was Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS). RESULTS: The mean weekly OMAS, pain score, and impact on swallowing score were not statistically significant in patients who rinsed with IS mouthwash compared to those who received NSS (p > 0.999 in every week). There was no difference in the mean onset to OM (all grades) (p = 0.704), and the mean duration of OM (all grades) (p = 0.365). Severe OM (WHO grade 3-4) occurred in three patients [IS=2, NSS=1] with the median onset of 45.50 & 33.00 days (p = NA), and the duration of 8.00 & 57.00 days (p = NA) in the IS and NSS groups, respectively. Oral candidiasis occurred in one patient from the NSS group while no secondary infection of oral mucosa was observed in the patients receiving IS mouthwash. CONCLUSION: The study could not reach statistically significance to show that IS mouthwash was effective in of prevention CCRT-induced OM. Further study with a larger number of participants is encouraged.

Extended-field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: The para-aortic lymph nodes (located along the major vessels in the mid and upper abdomen) are a common place for disease recurrence after treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. The para-aortic area is not covered by standard pelvic radiotherapy fields and so treatment to the pelvis alone is inadequate for women at a high risk of occult cancer within para-aortic lymph nodes. Extended-field radiotherapy (RT) widens the pelvic RT field to include the para-aortic lymph node area. Extended-field RT may improve outcomes in women with locally advanced cervical cancer by treating occult disease in para-aortic nodes not identified at pretreatment imaging. However, RT treatment of the para-aortic area can cause severe adverse effects, so may increase harms.Studies of pelvic chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated improved survival rates compared to pelvic RT alone. CRT is now the standard of care in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Studies comparing pelvic RT alone (without concurrent chemotherapy) with extended-field RT should therefore be viewed with caution, since they compare treatments against what is now substandard treatment (pelvic RT alone). This review should therefore be read with this in mind and comparisons with pelvic RT cannot be extrapolated to pelvic CRT. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of extended-field radiotherapy in women undergoing first-line treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 7), MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to August week 4, 2018), and Embase via Ovid (1980 to 2018, week 35). We checked registers of clinical trials, grey literature, conference reports, and citation lists of included studies to August 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and toxicity of extended-field RT for locally advanced cervical cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant RCTs, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, compared results, and made judgements on the quality and certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion or consultation with a third review author. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Three included studies compared extended-field RT versus pelvic RT, one included study compared extended-field RT with pelvic CRT, and one study compared extended-field CRT versus pelvic CRT.Extended-field radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy aloneCompared to pelvic RT, extended-field RT probably reduces the risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.94; 1 study; 337 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and para-aortic lymph node recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.70; 2 studies; 477 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), although there may or may not have been improvement in the risk of disease progression (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22; 1 study; 337 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and severe adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41; 2 studies; 776 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Extended-field radiotherapy versus pelvic chemoradiotherapyIn a comparison of extended-field RT versus pelvic CRT, women given pelvic CRT probably had a lower risk of death (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.64; 1 study; 389 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and disease progression (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.72; 1 study; 389 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants given extended-field RT may or may not have had a lower risk of para-aortic lymph node recurrence (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.99; 1 study; 389 participants; low-certainty evidence) and acute severe adverse events (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.11; 1 study; 388 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no clear differences in terms of late severe adverse events among the comparison groups (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.62; 1 study; 386 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Extended-field chemoradiotherapy versus pelvic chemoradiotherapyVery low-certainty evidence obtained from one small study (74 participants) showed that, compared to pelvic CRT, extended-field CRT may or may not have reduced risk of death (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.96) and disease progression (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.87). There were no clear differences between the groups in the risks of para-aortic lymph node recurrence (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.54; very low-certainty evidence) and severe adverse events (acute: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.20 to 4.39; late: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.06 to 14.59; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-certainty evidence shows that, compared with pelvic RT alone, extended-field RT probably improves overall survival and reduces risk of para-aortic lymph node recurrence. However, pelvic RT alone would now be considered substandard treatment, so this result cannot be extrapolated to modern standards of care. Low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests that pelvic CRT may increase overall and progression-free survival compared to extended-field RT, although there may or may not be a higher rate of para-aortic recurrence and acute adverse events. Extended-field CRT versus pelvic CRT may improve overall or progression-free survival, but these findings should be interpreted with caution due to very low-certainty evidence.High-quality RCTs, comparing modern treatment techniques in CRT, are needed to more fully inform treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer without obvious para-aortic node involvement.

Comparision of Different Radiotherapy Planning Techniques for Breast Cancer after Breast Conserving Surgery

Objectives:To compare different radiotherapy planning techniques for breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Materials and methods: Eighteen patients with breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery were selected. For each patient four different whole breast irradiation techniques including Tan, fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT were compared to the conventional tangential technique (Tan). Results: Mean maximum point dose (Dmax) for Tan, fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT were 110.17% (±1.87), 105.89% (±1.13), 106.47% (±0.92) and 106.99% (±1.16) (p<0.001). Mean minimum point dose (Dmin) from Tan was 84.02% (±3.68) which was significantly higher than those from fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT which were 76.57% (±11.4), 67.69 %( ±19.20) and 80.69% (±7.06) (p<0.001). Only the mean V95 of fIMRT was significantly less than Tan (p=0.01). Mean percentage of volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy (V20Gy) and mean doses of the ipsilateral lung were 17.09% and 953.05 cGy, 16.60% and 879.20 cGy, 14.79% and 772.26 cGy, 15.32% and 984.34 cGy for Tan, fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT. Only iIMRT had a significantly lower mean V20Gy and the mean dose to ipsilateral lung in comparison with Tan. Significantly, high mean doses to the contralateral breast (498.07 cGy, p<0.001) were observed in VMAT. Conclusion: The conventional tangential technique provides adequate dose coverage but resulted in high dose-volumes. The iIMRT and fIMRT had significantly smaller high dose-volumes and better conformity. VMAT demonstrated excellent dose homogeneity and conformity but an increased low-dose volume outside the target should be of concern.

Survival Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme

Introduction: To evaluate the survival of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Material and Methods: Patients with a pathological diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) between 1 January 1994 and 30 November 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with confirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients were treated by multimodality therapy. Exclusion criteria: 1) GBM patients with unconfirmed pathology, 2) GBM patients with spinal involvement, 3) GBM patients with incomplete data records. Seventy-seven patients were treated by multimodality therapy such as surgery plus post-operative radiotherapy (PORT), post-operative Temozolomide (TMZ) concurrent with radiotherapy (CCRT), post-operative CCRT with adjuvant TMZ. The overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Seventy-seven patients with a median age of 53 years (range 4-76 years) showed a median survival time (MST) of 12 months. In subgroup analyses, the PORT patients revealed a MST of 11 months and 2 year overall survival (OS) rates were 17.2%, the patients with post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvant TMZ revealed a MST of 23 months and 2 year OS rates were 38.2%. The MST of patients by Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA), classifications III, IV, V, VI were 26.8 months, 14.2 months, 9.9 months, and 4.0 months, (p <0.001). Conclusions: The MST of the patients who had post-operative CCRT with or without adjuvant TMZ was better than the PORT group. The RPA classification can be used to predict survival. Multimodality therapy demonstrated the most effective treatment outcome. Temozolomide might be beneficial for GBM patients in order to increase survival time.

Multiple Regression Analysis of Predictors of Bone Scintigraphy Positivity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers.

PURPOSE: The value of bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) has been questioned, with conflicting findings regarding positivity yield with some reports recommending BS be omitted from work-up of HNC patients since it rarely yields positive results. This study aims to determine the positivity yield of BS in HNCs and to determine predictors for BS positivity to help tailor appropriate BS utilization. METHODS: BS studies of HNC patients were reviewed, the positivity yield was determined. Clinical predictors for BS positivity including age, sex, site of cancer, staging, histological grading were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 259 BS studies included, 35 (13.5%), 194 (74.9%), and 30 (11.6%) were positive, negative, and equivocal for bone metastasis, respectively. After exclusion of equivocal cases, 229 were analyzed in the regression models. Independent predictors of BS positivity include site of tumor at the nasopharynx (OR 4.37, 95% C.I. 1.04-18.41, p = 0.044), age less than 45 years (OR 3.01, 95% C.I. 1.24-7.33, p = 0.015), and presence of distant metastasis to other organs (OR 3.84, 95% C.I. 1.19-12.43, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to several studies, bone metastasis as detected by BS was found in a relatively high proportion of patients with HNCs. Independent predictors of BS positivity include the age of less than 45 years, tumor site at the nasopharynx, and the presence of extraskeletal distant metastasis. BS could be useful in patients with these characteristics which enhance the pretest probability of bone metastasis.

Maximum Diameter of Intracranial Metastatic Lesions as a Prognostic Factor in Patients Following Whole Brain Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whetehr maximum diameter of intracranial metastatic lesions may be a prognostic factor in intracranial metastatic patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 114 cases who between January 2005 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 85 who met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In these 85, the oneyear overall survival rate was 16.5% and the median survival time was 125 days. Median survival in relation to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes I, II and III were 216, 133 and 85 days. Logrank tests of initial prognostic factors were significant for RPA classifications, Karnofsky Performance Status(KPS), maximum diameters of intracranial metastatic lesions and presence of necrotic centers. The median survivals with a maximum diameter of the largest intracranial metastatic lesion <3cm and ≥3cm were 162 days and 104 days (p=0.027). Multivariate analysis also showed a statistical significance for maximum diameter of intracranial metastatic lesions and presence of necrotic centers. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum diameters of intracranial metastatic lesions could be used as a prognostic factor in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy and may help radiation oncologists to make decisions on treatment plans.

Outcomes of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Combined Chemotherapy with Radiotherapy Without Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or combined chemotherapy together with radiotherapy (CMTRT) without surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (stage II or III) between January 1st, 2003 and December 31st, 2013 were enrolled, 48 treated with preoperative CCRT (Gr.I) and 36 with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CMTRT) without surgery (Gr.II). The chemotherapeutic agents used concurrent with radiotherapy were either 5fluorouracil short infusion plus leucovorin and/or capecitabine or 5fluorouracil infusion alone. All patients received pelvic irradiation. RESULTS: There were 5 patients (10.4%) with a complete pathological response. The 3 yearoverall survival rates were 83.2% in Gr.I and 24.8 % in Gr.II (p<0.01). The respective 5 yearoverall survival rates were 70.3% and 0% (p<0.01). The 5 yearoverall survival rates in Gr.I for patients who received surgery within 56 days after complete CCRT as compared to more than 56 days were 69.5% and 65.1% (p=0.91). Preoperative CCRT used for 12 of 30 patients in Gr.I (40%) with lower rectal cancer demonstrated that in preoperative CCRT a sphincter sparing procedure can be performed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment with preoperative CCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer showed comparable rates of overall survival and sphincter sparing procedures as compared to previous studies.

Treatment interruption during concurrent chemoradiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer; analysis of factors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate factors which effect treatment interruption during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and overall survival in patients with uterine cervical cancer stage IB2-IVA in Srinagarind Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2007, 107 patients with stage IB2-IVA as FIGO staging, 2000, were treated with CCRT in Srinagarind Hospital. Factors which caused treatment interruptions and impacted on overall survival were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty of 107 patients had treatment interruption during CCRT in patients with uterine cervical cancer stage IB2-IVA in Srinagarind Hospital. The causes of treatment interruption were as follows: hematologic toxicity was found in 16 of 20 cases, 12 cases with grade 2 and 4 cases with grade 3; three of 20 cases had gastrointestinal toxicities, 1 case with grade 2 and 2 cases with grade 3; one case had grade 3 skin toxicity. The mean total treatment time of the uninterrupted and interrupted groups were significantly different (78.98 days vs 161.80 days, p <0.001). The patients who could tolerate ≥5 cycles of cisplatin administration had significantly higher mean white blood counts (WBC) (9,769 cells/ mm3 vs 7,141 cells/mm3, p=0.02). The mean initial hemoglobin (Hb) in the uninterrupted group was significantly higher than the interrupted group (11.5 mg% vs 10.3 mg%, p=0.03). Other factors including age, KPS, initial platelets, initial serum creatinine levels showed no statistical significance. The 3-year overall survival of the uninterrupted group was better than in the interrupted group (78.6% vs 55.0%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The initial Hb and WBC levels were significantly correlated with treatment interruption during CCRT in patients with uterine cervical cancer. The 3-year overall survival of the uninterrupted group was significantly better than interrupted group. These factors may then be used indirectly to predict the outcomes of treatment.

Survival rate of early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of endometrium treated at Srinagarind Hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the survival outcome of early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium with risk factors for locoregional recurrence treated with combined pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) after comprehensive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-operative radiotherapy by pelvic EBRT and VBT for early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma resulted in excellent pelvic control with acceptable complications. This study showed no significant relationships between age, stage, histologic grade and LVSI and overall survival rate. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate (OS) of early stage endometrioid type of endometrial carcinoma was 85.7%. Acute toxicity occurred in 38.1% of the patients, all of whom were grade 1 or 2. Total late toxicity developed in 42.9% of study group, in which 36.99% of them were grade 1-2 and 4.76% were grade 3-4. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative radiotherapy by pelvic EBRT and VBT is acceptable for early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, independent of age, stage, histologic grade and LVSI.