Combining the SMAC mimetic LCL161 with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin therapy inhibits and prevents the emergence of multidrug resistance in cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly lethal gastrointestinal malignancy that has one of the worst prognoses among solid tumors. The combination of Gemcitabine + Cisplatin (GEM/CIS) remains the standard first-line treatment for advanced stage CCA. However, this drug combination yields only a modest objective response rate, and in cases that initially respond to this treatment, drug resistance commonly rapidly develops. To improve the efficiency of GEM/CIS therapy for CCA, a thorough understanding of the mechanism of GEM/CIS resistance in CCA is required. To that end - in this study, we developed several acquired GEM/CIS-resistant CCA cell lines and we screened those cell lines for acquired vulnerability. The screening process revealed that subset of CCA with GEM/CIS resistance acquired vulnerability to the small-molecule second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetics LCL161 and Birinapant. The observed acquired vulnerability was found to be associated with upregulation of an inhibitor of apoptosis protein 2 (cIAP2), a known target of SMAC mimetics. LCL161 or cIAP2-shRNA downregulated cIAP2 and restored the sensitivity to GEM/CIS in GEM/CIS-resistant CCA cell lines and in in vivo GEM/CIS-resistant xenograft models. A strong synergic effect was observed when LCL161 was added to GEM/CIS. Interestingly, this synergism was also observed in drug-naïve CCA cell lines, xenografts, and patient-derived organoids. This triplet therapy also prevented the emergence of multidrug-resistant CCA in in vitro and in vivo models. Our findings suggest that activation of cIAP2 allows CCA to escape GEM/CIS, and that suppression of cIAP2 reestablishes the apoptotic profile of CCA, thus restoring its vulnerability to GEM/CIS. The results of this study indicate that combining the SMAC mimetic LCL161 with GEM/CIS inhibits and prevents the emergence of multidrug resistance in CCA.

The Acquired Vulnerability Caused by CDK4/6 Inhibition Promotes Drug Synergism Between Oxaliplatin and Palbociclib in Cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is one of the most difficult to treat cancers, and its nature of being largely refractory to most, if not all, current treatments results in generally poor prognosis and high mortality. Efficacious alternative therapies that can be used ubiquitously are urgently needed. Using acquired vulnerability screening, we observed that CCA cells that reprofile and proliferate under CDK4/6 inhibition became vulnerable to ribosomal biogenesis stress and hypersensitive to the anti-ribosome chemotherapy oxaliplatin. CCA cells overexpress the oncogenic ribosomal protein RPL29 under CDK4/6 inhibition in a manner that correlated with CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. Depletion of RPL29 by small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) restored the sensitivity of CCA cells to CDK4/6 inhibition. Oxaliplatin treatment suppressed the RPL29 expression in the CDK4/6 inhibitor treated CCA cells and triggered RPL5/11-MDM2-dependent p53 activation and cancer apoptosis. In addition, we found that combination treatment with oxaliplatin and the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib synergistically inhibited both parental and CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant CCA, and prevented the emergence of CDK4/6 and oxaliplatin-resistant CCA. This drug combination also exerted suppressive and apoptosis effects on CCA in the in vitro 3-dimensional culture, patient-derived organoid, and in vivo xenograft CCA models. These results suggest the combination of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and the anti-ribosome drug oxaliplatin as a potentially promising treatment for cholangiocarcinoma.

Corrigendum: Combining the SMAC mimetic LCL161 with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin therapy inhibits and prevents the emergence of multidrug resistance in cholangiocarcinoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021632.].

Dependency of Cholangiocarcinoma on Cyclin D-Dependent Kinase Activity.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a bile duct cancer with a very poor prognosis. Currently, there is no effective pharmacological treatment available for it. We showed that CCA ubiquitously relies on cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) activity to proliferate. Primary CCA tissues express high levels of cyclin D1 and the specific marker of CDK4/6 activity, phospho-RB Ser780. Treatment of a 15-CCA cell line collection by pharmacological CDK4/6 inhibitors leads to reduced numbers of cells in the S-phase and senescence in most of the CCA cell lines. We found that expression of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is required for activity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, and that loss of pRB conferred CDK4/6 inhibitor-drug resistance. We also identified that sensitivity of CCA to CDK4/6 inhibition is associated with the activated KRAS signature. Effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibition for CCA was confirmed in the three-dimensional spheroid-, xenograft-, and patient-derived xenograft models. Last, we identified a list of genes whose expressions can be used to predict response to the CDK4/6 inhibitor. Conclusion: We investigated a ubiquitous dependency of CCA on CDK4/6 activity and the universal response to CDK4/6 inhibition. We propose that the CDK4/6-pRB pathway is a suitable therapeutic target for CCA treatment.

Cyclin D1 depletion interferes with oxidative balance and promotes cancer cell senescence.

Expression of cyclin D1 (CCND1) is required for cancer cell survival and proliferation. This is presumably due to the role of cyclin D1 in inactivation of the RB tumor suppressor. Here, we investigated the pro-survival function of cyclin D1 in a number of cancer cell lines. We found that cyclin D1 depletion facilitated cellular senescence in several cancer cell lines. Senescence triggered by cyclin D1 depletion was more extensive than that caused by the prolonged CDK4 inhibition. Intriguingly, the senescence caused by cyclin D1 depletion was independent of RB status of the cancer cell. We identified a build-up of intracellular reactive oxygen species in the cancer cells that underwent senescence upon depletion of cyclin D1 but not in those cells where CDK4 was inhibited. The higher ROS levels were responsible for the cell senescence, which was instigated by the p38-JNK-FOXO3a-p27 pathway. Therefore, expression of cyclin D1 prevents cancer cells from undergoing senescence, at least partially, by keeping the level of intracellular oxidative stress at a tolerable sub-lethal level. Depletion of cyclin D1 promotes the RB-independent pro-senescence pathway and the cancer cells then succumb to the endogenous oxidative stress levels.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.