Structural disadvantage and HIV risk - comparing risk factors between trans women's partnerships with cis men and trans women sexual partners.

Introduction: Little is known about differences in HIV risk for trans women by partner gender, particularly with respect to social determinants and partner-level circumstances that affect behavior. We examined differences in demographic, social determinants, and HIV-related risk behaviors for trans women with cis men and trans women sexual partners. Materials and Methods: Data are from a cross-sectional survey of trans women and their sexual partners conducted between April 2020 and January 2021. Interviews were held remotely during shelter-in-place due to Covid-19 via videoconference. Analysis characterizedassociations between HIV risk and protective behaviors comparing trans women with cisgender men partners to trans women with non-cisgender sexual partners. Results: A total of 336 sexual partners were identified from 156 trans women. Trans women with cis men partners had significantly less education and employment and more incarceration and recidivism than trans women with trans women partners. Trans women and their cisgender men partners had shared experiences of unstable housing, incarceration, and HIV. Trans women with cisgender men partners reported significantly more sex exchange partners, receptive condomless sex, receptive or insertive condomless sex while using substances, and HIV infection compared to trans women with trans women partners. Conclusions: Trans women with cisgender men sexual partners faced higher HIV risk than trans women with trans women sexual partners. These risks may be related to the social and economic drivers that both trans women and their cis men partners faced, including barriers to education and employment, along with incarceration and recidivism. Interventions focused on economic stability, workforce development and post incarceration re-entry support for housing and employment for trans women with cis men partners and the cisgender men partners as well may have the most impact on reducing HIV risk and incidence.

Disparities in HIV Testing and PrEP Awareness for Black Women who Inject Drugs in San Francisco, California.

HIV disproportionately affects Black/African Americans (AA), while PrEP is under-utilized by Black/AA, women, and people who inject drugs (PWID). In San Francisco, California's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance among PWID in 2022, Black/AA women were the least likely to be tested for HIV among all groups by sex and race/ethnicity and the least likely to be aware of PrEP among women. Yet, Black/AA women were no less likely to see a healthcare provider in the last year. Data suggest that providers' failure to discuss and address HIV risk with Black/AA female PWID is a major barrier to accessing effective care and prevention. El VIH afecta de manera desproporcionada a Black/afroamericanos (AA), mientras que la PrEP está infrautilizada por los Black/AA, las mujeres y las personas que se inyectan drogas (PWID). En la National HIV Behavioral Surveillance de PWID de San Francisco, California en 2022, las mujeres Black/AA eran las que menos probabilidades tenían de someterse a la prueba del VIH entre todos los grupos por sexo y raza/etnia y las que menos probabilidades tenían de conocer la PrEP entre las mujeres. Sin embargo, las mujeres Black/AA no tenían menos probabilidades de acudir a un profesional sanitario en el último año. Los datos sugieren que el hecho de que los proveedores no hablen ni aborden el riesgo de VIH con las PWID de raza Black/AA es un obstáculo importante para acceder a una atención y prevención eficaces.

Continuing Low Awareness and Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), San Francisco, 2022.

Clinical trials provide evidence that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV acquisition including through sharing of injection equipment among people who inject drugs (PWID). However, uptake among many populations at risk for HIV has been slow, particularly among PWID. We examined data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) from San Francisco in 2022 to measure PrEP uptake and identify factors associated with PrEP awareness among PWID. Of 479 PWID with HIV-negative or unknown HIV status, 54.9% were aware of PrEP, 5.9% had discussed PrEP with a healthcare provider, and 1.5% had used PrEP in the past year. Lack of PrEP awareness was associated with being age 50 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60), being men who have sex with women (vs. men who have sex with men, aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.92), having a disability (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.95), using heroin as their most frequently injected drug (aOR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.34-0.78), not having tested for HIV, HCV, or an STD in the past year (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64), and not having access to new sterile needles in the past year (aOR 0.28, 95%CI 0.08-1.00). We found negligible change in the awareness and uptake of PrEP among PWID since previously measured in NHBS in 2018. Low PrEP use among PWID may be addressed by increasing provider discussion of PrEP with their PWID patients and clients during routine care, expanding testing for injection-related infections among PWID, and integrating PrEP access into harm reduction programs.

Detectable viral load associated with unmet mental health and substance use needs among trans women living with HIV in San Francisco, California.

BACKGROUND: Substance use and mental distress are known barriers to HIV care engagement among trans women. Less is known about access and utilization of mental health and substance use care among trans women and the relationship between unmet behavioral health needs and HIV viral suppression. We examined the relationship between mental health and substance use on HIV viral load among trans women living with HIV. We also examined the relationship between mental health and substance use services needs with HIV care engagement and having a detectable viral load by comparing engagement in care cascades. METHODS: Data are from a 2022 baseline assessment for an intervention with trans women living with HIV (n = 42) in San Francisco. Chi-Squared or Fisher's exact tests were conducted to determine associations between HIV viral load, mental health, and substance use. We also examine characteristics associated with each step in the HIV, mental health, and substance use care cascades. RESULTS: Most participants were trans women of color (85.7%), 40 years of age or older (80.9%), with low income (88.1%), and almost half were unstably housed (47.6%). Of the 32 participants who screened positive for depression, anxiety and/or psychological distress, 56.3% were referred for mental health services in the past 12 months. Of those who were referred, 44.4% received mental health services. Of the 26 participants who screened positive for a substance use disorder, 34.6% were referred to substance use services in the past 12 months. Of those referred, 33.3% received substance use services in the past 3 months. Latina trans women had a low referral rate to meet their mental health needs (50%) and only 16.7% of African American/Black trans women who screened positive for a substance use disorder were referred for services, while trans women of other race/ethnicities had high referral and services utilization. No significant results were found between HIV viral load and screening positive for a mental health disorder. Methamphetamine use was statistically associated with having a detectable HIV viral load (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: We identified significant unmet mental health and substance use services needs and noted racial/ethnic disparities in the context of high HIV care engagement among trans women living with HIV. We also found that methamphetamine use was a barrier to having an undetectable viral load for trans women living with HIV. To finally end the HIV epidemic, integration of behavioral health screening, linkage, and support are needed in HIV care services for populations most impacted by HIV, especially trans women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT 21-34,978. Registered January 19, 2022.

Jail and Emergency Department Utilization in the Context of Harm Reduction Treatment for People Experiencing Homelessness and Alcohol Use Disorder.

People experiencing homelessness are disproportionately affected by alcohol use disorder (AUD). Abstinence-based treatment, however, does not optimally engage or treat this population. Thus, Harm Reduction Treatment for Alcohol (HaRT-A) was developed together with people with the lived experience of homelessness and AUD and community-based agencies that serve them. HaRT-A is a compassionate and pragmatic approach that aims to help people reduce alcohol-related harm and improve quality of life (QoL) without requiring abstinence or use reduction. The parent RCT showed that HaRT-A precipitated statistically significant reductions in alcohol use, alcohol-related harm, AUD symptoms, and positive urine toxicology tests. This secondary study tested HaRT-A effects on more distal, 6-month pre-to-posttreatment changes on jail and emergency department (ED) utilization. People experiencing homelessness and AUD (N = 168; 24% women) were recruited in community-based clinical and social services settings. Participants were randomized to receive HaRT-A or services as usual. Over four sessions, HaRT-A interventionists delivered three components: (a) collaborative tracking of participant-preferred alcohol metrics, (b) elicitation of harm-reduction and QoL goals, and (c) discussion of safer-drinking strategies. Administrative data on jail and ED utilization were extracted for 6 months pre- and posttreatment. Findings indicated no statistically significant treatment group differences on 6-month changes in jail or ED utilization (ps > .23). Exploratory analyses showed that 2-week frequency of alcohol use was positively correlated with number of jail bookings in the 12 months surrounding their study participation. Additionally, self-reported alcohol-related harm, importance of reducing alcohol-related harm, and perceived physical functioning predicted more ED visits. Future studies are needed to further assess how harm-reduction treatment may be enhanced to move the needle in criminal justice and healthcare utilization in the context of larger samples, longer follow-up timeframes, and more intensive interventions.