Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol ; 17(2): 83-86, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728370

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery constitute a large population of patients with anatomically similar incisions created under similar circumstances. AIM: Our study aimed at analysing and comparing rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) at the sternotomy sites based on the material used for skin closure of the sternal wound with special emphasis on presence of risk factors such as diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 9) and obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2) in the 2 respective groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. A total of 864 patients were included in the study. The patients were grouped into 2 groups depending on the sternal wound closure strategy used. One group consisted of patients in whom polyamide sutures were used for skin closure, while the other group comprised patients in whom skin staples were used for skin closure. Incidence of sternal wound SSIs in both groups was noted. Co-morbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus (with HbA1c > 9) and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) were noted and analysed as contributory factors for SSIs. RESULTS: Group A comprised 432 patients out of whom 42 (9.72%) had sternal wound SSIs. Group B comprised the other 432 patients of whom only 20 (4.62%) developed sternal wound SSIs. Co-morbid conditions were analysed in each group. Group A showed SSI in 22/64 (34.3%) diabetic patients, 6/28 (21.8%) obese patients and 16/22 (72.72%) with diabetes and obesity. Group B showed SSIs in 6/56 (10.715) diabetics, 4/26 (6.01%) obese and 4/24 (16.67%) with diabetes and obesity. CONCLUSIONS: By pairing staples and sutures, we observed a significantly lower incidence of total wound complications with suture than with staple closure.

3.
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol ; 17(4): 193-197, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33552183

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) usually presents as a result of chronic fibrous pericardial thickening and calcification of the pericardium which causes reduced cardiac output. Despite the lack of prospective studies comparing the different therapeutic strategies, surgical pericardiectomy is a valuable treatment under most circumstances. AIM: We analyzed our records to highlight the predictors of morbidity and mortality of pericardiectomy and also short-term surgical outcome of the same procedure in a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the records of patients who underwent surgery for CP at our institute between 2013 and 2018. 30 patients underwent isolated pericardiectomy. All patients underwent median sternotomy and total pericardiectomy without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative characteristics were noted. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis. The majority of the patients presented with NYHA grade III or IV. 60% of the patients were male. The preoperative mean central venous pressure was 24 ±9 mm Hg and decreased to 9 ±5 mm Hg after surgery. The 30-day mortality was 6.66% (2/30). Morbidity was mainly due to low-cardiac output syndrome (n = 4). A total of 26 patients had significant improvement in their NYHA status. CONCLUSIONS: Although pericardiectomy for CP remains associated with some operative mortality, the short-term outcome is favorable, and surgical treatment is able to improve the functional class in the majority of survivors.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...