Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Cardiol Young ; : 1-4, 2021 Oct 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34641991

RESUMO

We present the case of a 5-month-old infant with tetralogy of Fallot and congenital atrio-ventricular block that developed severe left ventricular dysfunction during apical left ventricular pacing, in which cardiac resynchronisation therapy was used as an emergency procedure due to persistent low cardiac output syndrome.

4.
Med Ultrason ; 20(3): 362-370, 2018 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30167591

RESUMO

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was shown to improve left atrial (LA) size and function within months after the procedure. We aimed to assess the impact of CRT on left atrial (LA) size and function within days after the procedure. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with CRT were evaluated before the procedure and within 3 days afterwards, and 25 of them were also examined at three months. Echocardiography was performed to assess LA size and function: LA volumes indexed to body surface (LAVIs) were measured at different moments during the cardiac cycle: ventricular end-systole - maximum LAVI (LAVImax), before atrial systole (LAVIpreA), and at ventricular end-diastole - minimum LAVI (LAVImin). These measurements were further used to calculate LA function parameters: LA total emptying fraction, activeemptying fraction and passive emptying fraction. RESULTS: LAVImax decreased within days after the procedure - 45.5 mL/ m2 (38.2-56.7) vs. 42.9 mL/m2 (32.1- 56.2), p <0.05, as did LAVImin - 27.1 mL/m2 (22.9-41.9) vs. 25.9 mL/m2 (17.8-38.1), p <0.05, and LAVIpreA - 40.0 mL/m2 (31.3-53.0) vs. 35.5 mL/m2 (25.8-49.1), without significant changes in functional parameters. All LAVIs were correlated to the diastolic filling time/RR interval ratio after CRT, but not before. CONCLUSIONS: LAVIs may be reduced within days after the implant procedure in responders to CRT, while atrial functional parameters remain unchanged. Correlations beween LAVIs and the diastolic filling time/RR interval ratio after CRT suggest that early optimization of atrio-ventricular and ventriculo-ventricular delays may have a positive and immediate impact on LA size.


Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/métodos , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/terapia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Átrios do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Anatol J Cardiol ; 17(4): 276-284, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28315564

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The predictive value of five risk score models containing clinical (PAMI-PMS, GRACE-GRS, and modified ACEF-ACEFm-scores), angiographic SYNTAX score (SXS) and combined Clinical SYNTAX score (CSS) variables were evaluated for the incidence of three procedural complications of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI): iatrogenic coronary artery dissection, angiographically visible distal embolization and angiographic no-reflow phenomenon. METHODS: The mentioned scores and the incidence of procedural complications were retrospectively analyzed in 399 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent pPCI. RESULTS: Coronary dissection, distal embolization and no-reflow occurred in 39 (9.77%), 71 (17.79%), and 108 (27.07%) subjects, respectively. Coronary dissections were significantly associated with higher GRS, ACEFm, and CSS values (all p<0.05). PMS, GRS, ACEFm, and CSS were significantly higher in patients with no-reflow (all p<0.05), while distal embolization was not predicted by any of the calculated scores. In multiple logistic regression models, GRS and ACEFm remained independent predictors of both coronary dissections (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.56-6.54, p<0.01 and OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.27-6.45, p=0.01, respectively) and no-reflow (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04-2.82, p=0.03 and OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.14, p=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Whereas SXS failed to predict procedural complications related to pPCI, two simple, noninvasive risk models, GRS and ACEFm, independently predicted coronary dissections and no-reflow. Pre-interventional assessment of these scores may help the interventional cardiologist to prepare for procedural complications during pPCI.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...