Variations in Circulating Active MMP-9 Levels During Renal Replacement Therapy.

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complicated by a chronic state of inflammation and a high mortality risk. However, different RRT modalities can have a selective impact on markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. We evaluated the levels of active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in patients undergoing two types of dialysis (high-flux dialysis (HFD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF)) and in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. Active MMP-9 was measured by zymography and ELISA before (pre-) and after (post-) one dialysis session, and at baseline and follow-up (7 and 14 days, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months) after KT. Active MMP-9 decreased post-dialysis only in HFD patients, while the levels in OL-HDF patients were already lower before dialysis. Active MMP-9 increased at 7 and 14 days post-KT and was restored to baseline levels three months post-KT, coinciding with an improvement in renal function and plasma creatinine. Active MMP-9 correlated with pulse pressure as an indicator of arterial stiffness both in dialysis patients and KT recipients. In conclusion, active MMP-9 is better controlled in OL-HDF than in HFD and is restored to baseline levels along with stabilization of renal parameters after KT. Active MMP-9 might act as a biomarker of arterial stiffness in RRT.

Oxidative Status before and after Renal Replacement Therapy: Differences between Conventional High Flux Hemodialysis and on-Line Hemodiafiltration.

Hemodialysis patients experience high oxidative stress because of systemic inflammation and depletion of antioxidants. Little is known about the global oxidative status during dialysis or whether it is linked to the type of dialysis. We investigated the oxidative status before (pre-) and after (post-) one dialysis session in patients subjected to high-flux dialysis (HFD) or on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). We analyzed carbonyls, oxidized LDL (oxLDL), 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, and xanthine oxidase (XOD) activity as oxidative markers, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC), catalase, and superoxide dismutase activities as measures of antioxidant defense. Indices of oxidative damage (OxyScore) and antioxidant defense (AntioxyScore) were computed and combined into a global DialysisOxyScore. Both dialysis modalities cleared all markers (p < 0.01) except carbonyls, which were unchanged, and oxLDL, which increased post-dialysis (p < 0.01). OxyScore increased post-dialysis (p < 0.001), whereas AntioxyScore decreased (p < 0.001). XOD and catalase activities decreased post-dialysis after OL-HDF (p < 0.01), and catalase activity was higher after OL-HDF than after HFD (p < 0.05). TAC decreased in both dialysis modalities (p < 0.01), but remained higher in OL-HDF than in HFD post-dialysis (p < 0.05), resulting in a lower overall DialysisOxyScore (p < 0.05). Thus, patients on OL-HDF maintain higher levels of antioxidant defense, which might balance the elevated oxidative stress during dialysis, although further longitudinal studies are needed.