RESUMO
Voiding difficulty has been relatively overlooked as a diagnosis. Previous estimates of its prevalence have generally been no more than 14% with one exception at 24%. The aim of this study is to determine the true prevalence and associations of voiding difficulty using a validated definition [urine flow rate under 10th centile of the Liverpool Nomograms and/or residual urine volume (by transvaginal ultrasound) more than 30 ml]. This study involved 592 women referred for an initial urogynecological assessment including urodynamics. Data were separated according to the presence or absence of voiding difficulty. The prevalence of voiding difficulty was 39%, far higher than previous estimates. It is the third most common urodynamic diagnosis behind urodynamic stress incontinence (USI-72%) and uterine/vaginal prolapse (61%) and ahead of the overactive bladder (13%). Voiding difficulty significantly increased in prevalence with age and increasing grades of all types of uterine/vaginal prolapse. Prolapse appeared to be the main factor in the age deterioration. Other significant positive relationships with voiding difficulty were prior hysterectomy and prior continence surgery, whilst USI and the symptom and sign of stress incontinence had significant inverse relationships.
Assuntos
Retenção Urinária/diagnóstico , Retenção Urinária/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Cistocele/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Menopausa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Prolapso Uterino/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of once-daily, extended-release tolterodine on urinary urgency in patients with overactive bladder. METHODS: Patients with urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions per 24 hours) and urge incontinence (five or more episodes per week) were randomized to oral treatment with tolterodine extended release 4 mg once daily (n=398) or placebo (n=374) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by use of patient perception evaluations. RESULTS: The results presented are a secondary analysis of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Of patients treated with tolterodine extended release, 44% reported improved urgency symptoms (compared with 32% for placebo), and 62% reported improved bladder symptoms (placebo, 48%) (both P<.001 compared with placebo). The odds of reducing urgency and improving bladder symptoms were 1.68 and 1.78 times greater, respectively, for patients in the tolterodine extended release group than for patients receiving placebo. In response to urgency, there was a more than six-fold increase in the proportion of patients able to finish a task before voiding in the tolterodine extended release group. The proportion of patients unable to hold urine upon experiencing urgency was also decreased by 58% with tolterodine, compared with 32% with placebo (P<.001). The proportion of patients reporting "much benefit" from treatment was greater for tolterodine extended release than for placebo (43% versus 24%; P<.001). The only adverse events with an incidence of greater than 5% were dry mouth, headache, and constipation, with only dry mouth markedly more frequent with tolterodine than with placebo. CONCLUSION: Tolterodine extended release has demonstrable efficacy in reducing the severity of urinary urgency and is associated with improvements in overactive bladder symptoms that are meaningful to patients.