Impact of early versus late systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis on clinical and economic outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem complex autoimmune disease that often mimics symptoms of other illnesses, which complicates the ability of healthcare providers to make the diagnosis. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and costs between patients with earlier versus later SLE diagnosis. METHODS: Patients aged 18-64 years were identified from a large US commercial claims database between January 2000 and June 2010. Confirmed SLE diagnosis with a claims-based algorithm required either three or more claims for a visit to a rheumatologist on separate dates with an SLE diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD-9] code 710.0x), two or more claims for visits to a rheumatologist at least 60 days apart with SLE diagnoses, or two or more claims for visits to rheumatologist less than 60 days apart with SLE diagnoses with at least one dispensing for a typical SLE medication. SLE probable onset date was identified during the 12-month baseline period by the second claim for antinuclear antibody tests or prodromal symptoms of SLE. Patients were stratified into early or late diagnosis groups based on time between probable SLE onset and diagnosis (<6 months or ≥6 months, respectively). Each patient observation period began on the date of the first medical claim, with a diagnosis code for SLE that satisfied the inclusion criteria, and ended on the earliest date between health plan disenrollment and 30 June 2010. Patients in each group were propensity-score matched on age, gender, diagnosis year, region, health plan type, and comorbidities. Flare rates and resource utilization were compared post-diagnosis between groups using rate ratios. All-cause and SLE-related costs (adjusted to 2010 US dollars) per patient per month (PPPM) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 4,166 matched patients per group. Post-SLE diagnosis, the early diagnosis group had lower rates of mild (rate ratio [RR] 0.95; 95 % CI 0.93-0.96), moderate (RR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.94-0.99), and severe (RR 0.87; 95 % CI 0.82-0.93) flares compared with the late diagnosis group. The rates of hospitalizations (RR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.75-0.85) were lower for the early diagnosis group than the late diagnosis group. Compared with late diagnosis patients, mean all-cause inpatient costs PPPM were lower for the early diagnosis patients (US$406 vs. US$486; p = 0.016). Corresponding SLE-related hospitalization costs were also lower for early compared with late diagnosis patients (US$71 vs. US$95; p = 0.013). Results were consistent for other resource use and cost categories. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with SLE sooner may experience lower flare rates, less healthcare utilization, and lower costs from a commercially insured population perspective. This finding needs to be further explored within the context of background SLE disease activity.

Safety and treatment patterns of angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world safety and treatment patterns of angiogenesis inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) using observational data from two Spanish hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed for 93 patients with a histological diagnosis of aRCC who received sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab or temsirolimus as first-line angiogenesis inhibitor therapy, between January 2005 and September 2010 at two Spanish hospitals. Data were collected on adverse events (AEs), dosing to calculate relative dose intensity (RDI), treatment modifications and reasons for modifications. RESULTS: Sixty patients received sunitinib, 23 received sorafenib, 6 received bevacizumab, 1 received temsirolimus and 3 received a bevacizumab-temsirolimus combination. 91.7 and 100.0% of patients receiving sunitinib and sorafenib, respectively, experienced ≥ 1 AE; 40.0% and 43.5% had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 AE. Mean RDI for sunitinib and sorafenib were 0.866 (standard deviation (std) = 0.903) and 0.798 (std = 2.154), respectively. Among patients receiving sunitinib, 15.0% discontinued treatment, 43.3% had an interruption and 33.3% had a reduction due to AEs. For sorafenib, these rates were 4.3, 56.5 and 34.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of AEs were observed which resulted in high rates of treatment interruptions and dose reductions. These results suggest the need for additional treatment options for aRCC with improved tolerability.