Reassessing dose constraints of organs at risk in children with abdominal neuroblastoma treated with definitive radiation therapy: a correlation with late toxicity.

BACKGROUND: In children treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) for abdominal neuroblastoma, normal tissue constraints for organs at risk (OARs) are not well-standardized or evidence-based. In this study, we analyze dosimetric data of principal abdominal OARs, reassess existing RT planning constraints, and examine corresponding acute and late toxicity to OARs. PROCEDURE: The treatment plans of 30 consecutive children who underwent definitive RT for high-risk abdominal neuroblastoma were reviewed. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) statistics were recorded for the ipsilateral kidney (if unresected), contralateral kidney, and liver. DVH data were analyzed to determine if OAR constraints from recent protocols were met and correlated with the development of toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 53.0 months. Ten, thirteen, and ten percent of patients' RT plans did not meet OAR DVH constraints for the liver, ipsilateral kidney, and contralateral kidney, respectively. Of the three patients whose plans did not achieve ipsilateral kidney DVH constraint(s), two developed evidence of late ipsilateral kidney hypoplasia, but maintained normal laboratory kidney function. No patient experienced late toxicity of the contralateral kidney nor developed RT-related late hepatic complications. CONCLUSIONS: In children treated for abdominal neuroblastoma, the risk of developing clinically significant RT-related late toxicity of the kidney and liver is not appreciable, even when current DVH parameters for OARs are not achieved in planning. Toxicity outcomes did not necessarily correlate with present-day OAR dose constraints. Currently utilized DVH constraints are highly variable, and must be further studied and supported by toxicity outcomes to more accurately characterize risk of complications.

Radiation therapy target volume reduction in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: implications for patterns of disease recurrence and overall survival.

BACKGROUND: The use of radiation therapy (RT) "cone-down" boost to reduce high-dose treatment volumes according to tumor response to induction chemotherapy in patients with pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) may reduce treatment morbidity, yet the impact on tumor control is unknown. METHODS: Fifty-five children, including 18 (33%) with parameningeal (PM) RMS and 37 (67%) with non-PM RMS, who received definitive treatment with chemotherapy and RT from April 2000 through January 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients (51%) received a cone-down boost. The high-dose boost volume was reduced by a median of 56% of the initial target volume (range, 5%-91%). The median time to initiating RT was 3 weeks for patients with PM RMS and 16 weeks for patients with non-PM RMS (P < .001). After a median follow-up of 41 months, local failure occurred in 5 patients (9%), including 2 patients who received a cone-down boost, and there were no marginal failures. Twelve patients (67%) with PM RMS had intracranial tumor extension. In this subgroup, 4 patients (30%) who received a cone-down boost and had ≥ 3 weeks between chemotherapy and RT initiation experienced leptomeningeal failure as their first site of disease progression, and a delayed time to RT initiation was associated with decreased survival (P = .055) CONCLUSIONS: A cone-down boost allowed for significant reductions in high-dose RT treatment volume while maintaining excellent tumor control in most patients. However, in the subset of patients with PM RMS and intracranial tumor extension, early RT initiation and wider margin RT to cover adjacent areas at high risk for meningeal extension may be more important for adequate disease control.

The electronification of the radiation oncology treatment cycle: the promises and pitfalls of a digital department.

Radiation oncology departments are becoming more complex in terms of documentation, calculation, and delivery of therapy. Automation of such processes minimizes the likelihood of human error in each, and is clearly the direction in which the discipline is heading. The patient treatment cycle should be seamlessly integrated; unfortunately this is seldom the case given the different systems involved. We describe the Emory University experience, with cautions provided based on our lessons learned.