Comparison of ROS1-rearrangement detection methods in a cohort of surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1)-rearrangement respond to treatment with ROS1 inhibitors. To distinguish these rare cases, screening with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ROS1 protein expression has been suggested. However, the reliability of such an assay and the comparability of the antibody clones has been debated. Therefore we evaluated the diagnostic performance of current detection strategies for ROS1-rearrangement in two NSCLC-patient cohorts. Methods: Resected tissue samples, retrospectively collected from consecutive NSCLC-patients surgically treated at Uppsala University Hospital were incorporated into tissue microarrays [all n=676, adenocarcinomas (AC) n=401, squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) n=213, other NSCLC n=62]. ROS1-rearrangements were detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Abbott Molecular; ZytoVision). In parallel, ROS1 protein expression was detected using IHC with three antibody clones (D4D6, SP384, EPMGHR2) and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were determined. Gene expression microarray data (Affymetrix) and RNA-sequencing data were available for a subset of patients. NanoString analyses were performed for samples with positive or ambiguous results (n=21). Results: Using FISH, 2/630 (0.3% all NSCLC; 0.5% non-squamous NSCLC) cases were positive for ROS1 fusion. Additionally, nine cases demonstrated ambiguous FISH results. Using IHC, ROS1 protein expression was detected in 24/665 (3.6% all NSCLC; 5.1% non-squamous NSCLC) cases with clone D4D6, in 18/639 (2.8% all NSCLC; 3.9% non-squamous NSCLC) cases with clone SP384, and in 1/593 (0.2% all NSCLC; 0.3% non-squamous NSCLC) case with clone EPMGHR2. Elevated RNA-levels were seen in 19/369 (5.1%) cases (Affymetrix and RNA-sequencing combined). The overlap of positive results between the assays was poor. Only one of the FISH-positive cases was positive with all antibodies and demonstrated high RNA-expression. This rearrangement was confirmed in the NanoString-assay and also in the RNA-sequencing data. Other cases with high protein/RNA-expression or ambiguous FISH were negative in the NanoString-assay. Conclusions: The occurrence of ROS1 fusions is low in our cohorts. The IHC assays detected the fusions, but the accuracy varied depending on the clone. The presumably false-positive and uncertain FISH results questions this method for detection of ROS1-rearrangements. Thus, when IHC is used for screening, transcript-based assays are preferable for validation in clinical diagnostics.

Estradiol Alters the Virulence Traits of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the most common bacteria to cause urinary tract infection (UTI). Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of recurrent UTI. This is partly explained by estrogenic effects on host defenses against UTI. Current research is mostly focused on how UPEC affects host factors, but not so much is known about how host factors like hormones affect UPEC virulence. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of estradiol exposure on the virulence of UPEC. We found that a postmenopausal concentration of estradiol increased CFT073 growth and biofilm formation, but not the premenopausal concentrations. Real-time qPCR showed that estradiol altered the expression of genes associated with the iron acquisition system and metabolic pathways in CFT073. We also found that estradiol in a dose-dependent manner increased the expression of fimH and papC adhesins and increased colonization and invasion of bladder epithelial cells. The premenopausal concentration of estradiol also suppressed cytokine release from bladder epithelial cells. Additionally, we also showed using a Caenorhabditis elegans killing assay that estradiol increased the survival of CFT073-infected C. elegans worms. Taken together, our findings show that estradiol has the ability to alter the virulence traits of UPEC.

Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Mediator Complex Transcriptome Identifies CDK19 and CDK8 as Therapeutic Targets in Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Purpose: The Mediator complex is a multiprotein assembly, which serves as a hub for diverse signaling pathways to regulate gene expression. Because gene expression is frequently altered in cancer, a systematic understanding of the Mediator complex in malignancies could foster the development of novel targeted therapeutic approaches.Experimental Design: We performed a systematic deconvolution of the Mediator subunit expression profiles across 23 cancer entities (n = 8,568) using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Prostate cancer-specific findings were validated in two publicly available gene expression cohorts and a large cohort of primary and advanced prostate cancer (n = 622) stained by immunohistochemistry. The role of CDK19 and CDK8 was evaluated by siRNA-mediated gene knockdown and inhibitor treatment in prostate cancer cell lines with functional assays and gene expression analysis by RNAseq.Results: Cluster analysis of TCGA expression data segregated tumor entities, indicating tumor-type-specific Mediator complex compositions. Only prostate cancer was marked by high expression of CDK19 In primary prostate cancer, CDK19 was associated with increased aggressiveness and shorter disease-free survival. During cancer progression, highest levels of CDK19 and of its paralog CDK8 were present in metastases. In vitro, inhibition of CDK19 and CDK8 by knockdown or treatment with a selective CDK8/CDK19 inhibitor significantly decreased migration and invasion.Conclusions: Our analysis revealed distinct transcriptional expression profiles of the Mediator complex across cancer entities indicating differential modes of transcriptional regulation. Moreover, it identified CDK19 and CDK8 to be specifically overexpressed during prostate cancer progression, highlighting their potential as novel therapeutic targets in advanced prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1829-40. ©2016 AACR.

Inconsistent results in the analysis of ALK rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Identification of targetable EML4-ALK fusion proteins has revolutionized the treatment of a minor subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is regarded as the gold standard for detection of ALK rearrangements, ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is often used as screening tool in clinical practice. In order to unbiasedly analyze the diagnostic impact of such a screening strategy, we compared ALK IHC with ALK FISH in three large representative Swedish NSCLC cohorts incorporating clinical parameters and gene expression data. METHODS: ALK rearrangements were detected using FISH on tissue microarrays (TMAs), including tissue from 851 NSCLC patients. In parallel, ALK protein expression was detected using IHC, applying the antibody clone D5F3 with two different protocols (the FDA approved Ventana CDx assay and our in house Dako IHC protocol). Gene expression microarray data (Affymetrix) was available for 194 patients. RESULTS: ALK rearrangements were detected in 1.7 % in the complete cohort and 2.0 % in the non-squamous cell carcinoma subgroup. ALK protein expression was observed in 1.8 and 1.4 % when applying the Ventana assay or the in house Dako protocol, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of IHC was high (> 98 %), while the sensitivity was between 69 % (Ventana) and 62 % (in house Dako protocol). Furthermore, only 67 % of the ALK IHC positive cases were positive with both IHC assays. Gene expression analysis revealed that 6/194 (3 %) tumors showed high ALK gene expression (≥ 6 AU) and of them only three were positive by either FISH or IHC. CONCLUSION: The overall frequency of ALK rearrangements based on FISH was lower than previously reported. The sensitivity of both IHC assays was low, and the concordance between the FISH and the IHC assays poor, questioning current strategies to screen with IHC prior to FISH or completely replace FISH by IHC.

A comparative study of ERG status assessment on DNA, mRNA, and protein levels using unique samples from a Swedish biopsy cohort.

The ERG rearrangement is identified in approximately 50% of prostate cancer screened cohorts and is known to be highly specific. This genetic aberration, most commonly leading to the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, but also SLC45A3-ERG or NDRG1-ERG fusions, all leading to an overexpression of a truncated ERG protein. Most studies have applied in situ hybridization (FISH) methods or mRNA-based assays to investigate the ERG status. Recently, studies showed that ERG protein levels assessed by ERG antibodies can be used as a surrogate marker for ERG rearrangement. In the current study, we investigate ERG status on a series of diagnostic biopsies using DNA-based, mRNA-based, and protein-based assays. We formally compared 3 assay results (ie, FISH, fusion mRNA, and immunohistochemistry) to identify which method could be most appropriate to use when having limited amount of tissue. ERG rearrangement was found in 56% of the cases. Comparing ERG rearrangement status by FISH with ERG overexpression and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcript we found 95.1% (154/162, Fisher exact test 9.50E-36) and 85.2% (138/162, Fisher exact test 7.26E-22) concordance, respectively. We show that the ERG antibody highly correlates with the ERG rearrangement with high sensitivity and specificity. We also identified the most common TMPRSS2-ERG isoform in the majority of ERG rearranged cases. These results provide compelling evidence that the ERG antibody can be used to further investigate the role of ERG in prostate cancer.

Prognostic significance of phospho-histone H3 in prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cause of death from cancer in men worldwide. Currently, a sufficient pathological distinction between patients requiring further treatment and those for which active surveillance remains an option is still lacking, which leads to the problem of overtreatment. Cell proliferation is routinely assessed by detecting Ki-67 antigen. While Ki-67 is expressed throughout the interphase of proliferating cells, phosphorylation of the chromatin constituent histone H3 occurs only during the late G2 phase and mitosis thus providing a more strict assessment of the mitotic activity. We undertook this study to test whether expression of the recently introduced proliferation marker phospho-histone H3 (pHH3) in prostate carcinoma tissue sections exhibits prognostic significance in comparison with Ki-67. METHODS: Protein expression of pHH3 and Ki-67 was assessed on TMA consisting of paraffin-embedded tissue from men that had undergone radical prostatectomy. The analysis included triplicate tissue cores of a total of 339 tumor foci. Immunohistochemical staining of pHH3 and Ki-67 was performed and analyzed using Definiens imaging software. RESULTS: Prostate cancer tissue exhibited a significantly higher frequency of pHH3-positive cells compared to benign prostate tissue. pHH3 expression was significantly correlated with Ki-67 expression. Furthermore, statistical analysis revealed positive correlation between pHH3 expression and PSA levels at diagnosis and in addition negatively correlated with overall survival. In contrast to Ki-67 staining, pHH3 expression did not correlate with Gleason grade. CONCLUSION: Our data point to a conceivable role of pHH3 as prognostic biomarker in prostate carcinoma.

Testing mutual exclusivity of ETS rearranged prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is a clinically heterogeneous and multifocal disease. More than 80% of patients with prostate cancer harbor multiple geographically discrete cancer foci at the time of diagnosis. Emerging data suggest that these foci are molecularly distinct consistent with the hypothesis that they arise as independent clones. One of the strongest arguments is the heterogeneity observed in the status of E26 transformation specific (ETS) rearrangements between discrete tumor foci. The clonal evolution of individual prostate cancer foci based on recent studies demonstrates intertumoral heterogeneity with intratumoral homogeneity. The issue of multifocality and interfocal heterogeneity is important and has not been fully elucidated due to lack of the systematic evaluation of ETS rearrangements in multiple tumor sites. The current study investigates the frequency of multiple gene rearrangements within the same focus and between different cancer foci. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were designed to detect the four most common recurrent ETS gene rearrangements. In a cohort of 88 men with localized prostate cancer, we found ERG, ETV1, and ETV5 rearrangements in 51% (44/86), 6% (5/85), and 1% (1/86), respectively. None of the cases demonstrated ETV4 rearrangements. Mutual exclusiveness of ETS rearrangements was observed in the majority of cases; however, in six cases, we discovered multiple ETS or 5' fusion partner rearrangements within the same tumor focus. In conclusion, we provide further evidence for prostate cancer tumor heterogeneity with the identification of multiple concurrent gene rearrangements.

Discovery of non-ETS gene fusions in human prostate cancer using next-generation RNA sequencing.

Half of prostate cancers harbor gene fusions between TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS transcription factor family. To date, little is known about the presence of non-ETS fusion events in prostate cancer. We used next-generation transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) in order to explore the whole transcriptome of 25 human prostate cancer samples for the presence of chimeric fusion transcripts. We generated more than 1 billion sequence reads and used a novel computational approach (FusionSeq) in order to identify novel gene fusion candidates with high confidence. In total, we discovered and characterized seven new cancer-specific gene fusions, two involving the ETS genes ETV1 and ERG, and four involving non-ETS genes such as CDKN1A (p21), CD9, and IKBKB (IKK-beta), genes known to exhibit key biological roles in cellular homeostasis or assumed to be critical in tumorigenesis of other tumor entities, as well as the oncogene PIGU and the tumor suppressor gene RSRC2. The novel gene fusions are found to be of low frequency, but, interestingly, the non-ETS fusions were all present in prostate cancer harboring the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. Future work will focus on determining if the ETS rearrangements in prostate cancer are associated or directly predispose to a rearrangement-prone phenotype.

ERG rearrangement metastasis patterns in locally advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To interrogate multifocal prostate cancer (PCa) to determine its predilection for metastasis, using ERG rearrangement as marker of clonality. A hallmark of PCa is that distinct tumor foci may arise independently, which has important biological and clinical implications. Recent studies characterizing ERG-rearranged PCa possessing intrafocal homogeneity but interfocal heterogeneity support this hypothesis. METHODS: We studied 26 patients who underwent prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy with at least 2 distinct PCa foci and 1 lymph node (LN) metastasis. Each focus was assessed for size, Gleason score, ERG rearrangement, and TMPRSS2-ERG transcript. RESULTS: Fifteen of 26 cases exhibited interfocal homogeneity with regard to ERG rearrangement (ie, presence vs absence of ERG rearrangement). ERG rearrangement was present in all foci for 6 and absent in all foci for 9 cases. Two cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement mechanism (ie, rearrangement through insertion or deletion). Eight of 26 cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement status. In all cases with at least 1 ERG rearranged focus, we found the corresponding LN metastasis harboring an ERG rearrangement. Interestingly, in a subset of cases the rearrangement status in the LN did not correspond to size or Gleason score. All but 2 ERG rearranged foci had detectable TMPRSS2-ERG transcript levels. CONCLUSIONS: When multifocal PCa demonstrates both ERG-positive and ERG-negative foci, the positive foci have a greater predilection for metastasis. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential additional risk an ERG rearranged focus confers on the likelihood of disease progression.

N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) is fused to ERG in prostate cancer.

A step toward the molecular classification of prostate cancer was the discovery of recurrent erythroblast transformation-specific rearrangements, most commonly fusing the androgen-regulated TMPRSS2 promoter to ERG. The TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is observed in around 90% of tumors that overexpress the oncogene ERG. The goal of the current study was to complete the characterization of these ERG-overexpressing prostate cancers. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays, we screened 101 prostate cancers, identifying 34 cases (34%) with the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion. Seven cases demonstrated ERG rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization without the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion messenger RNA transcripts. Screening for known 5' partners, we determined that three cases harbored the SLC45A3-ERG fusion. To discover novel 5' partners in these ERG-overexpressing and ERG-rearranged cases, we used paired-end RNA sequencing. We first confirmed the utility of this approach by identifying the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion in a known positive prostate cancer case and then discovered a novel fusion involving the androgen-inducible tumor suppressor, NDRG1 (N-myc downstream regulated gene 1), and ERG in two cases. Unlike TMPRSS2-ERG and SCL45A3-ERG fusions, the NDRG1-ERG fusion is predicted to encode a chimeric protein. Like TMPRSS2, SCL45A3 and NDRG1 are inducible not only by androgen but also by estrogen. This study demonstrates that most ERG-overexpressing prostate cancers harbor hormonally regulated TMPRSS2-ERG, SLC45A3-ERG, or NDRG1-ERG fusions. Broader implications of this study support the use of RNA sequencing to discover novel cancer translocations.

Distinct genomic aberrations associated with ERG rearranged prostate cancer.

Emerging molecular and clinical data suggest that ETS fusion prostate cancer represents a distinct molecular subclass, driven most commonly by a hormonally regulated promoter and characterized by an aggressive natural history. The study of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer in the light of ETS fusion events is required to understand the foundation of this molecularly and clinically distinct subtype. We performed genome-wide profiling of 49 primary prostate cancers and identified 20 recurrent chromosomal copy number aberrations, mainly occurring as genomic losses. Co-occurring events included losses at 19q13.32 and 1p22.1. We discovered three genomic events associated with ERG rearranged prostate cancer, affecting 6q, 7q, and 16q. 6q loss in nonrearranged prostate cancer is accompanied by gene expression deregulation in an independent dataset and by protein deregulation of MYO6. To analyze copy number alterations within the ETS genes, we performed a comprehensive analysis of all 27 ETS genes and of the 3 Mbp genomic area between ERG and TMPRSS2 (21q) with an unprecedented resolution (30 bp). We demonstrate that high-resolution tiling arrays can be used to pin-point breakpoints leading to fusion events. This study provides further support to define a distinct molecular subtype of prostate cancer based on the presence of ETS gene rearrangements.