The merits of cytology in the workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma - a contemporary review of a perplexing issue.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of upper tract cytology for evaluating tumors is unclear. We correlated upper tract cytology with histologic findings in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a single tertiary care referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 137 patients underwent nephroureterectomy between 2004 and 2012. 18 patients were excluded (benign tumors, atrophic kidneys with the remaining 119 patients serving as our study population). Upper tract cytology from the renal pelvis and/or ureter were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed with final pathology data in the remaining patients with UTUC. RESULTS: 57% (68/119) had preoperative upper tract cytology collected. 73% (50/68) patients had abnormal cytology (positive, suspicious) with a sensitivity of 74% (which increased to 90% if atypical included), specificity of 50% and a positive predictive value of 98%. High grade tumors were more common than expected (77% high grade vs. 20% low grade). Abnormal cytology did not predict T stage or tumor grade. Interestingly, positive upper tract cytology was found in all of the UTUC CIS specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Upper tract cytology has been utilized to support the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Our data demonstrates that abnormal cytology correlates well with the presence of disease but does not predict staging or grading in these respective patients.

The merits of cytology in the workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma - a contemporary review of a perplexing issue

Introduction The importance of upper tract cytology for evaluating tumors is unclear. We correlated upper tract cytology with histologic findings in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a single tertiary care referral center. Materials and Methods 137 patients underwent nephroureterectomy between 2004 and 2012. 18 patients were excluded (benign tumors, atrophic kidneys with the remaining 119 patients serving as our study population). Upper tract cytology from the renal pelvis and/or ureter were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed with final pathology data in the remaining patients with UTUC. Results 57% (68/119) had preoperative upper tract cytology collected. 73% (50/68) patients had abnormal cytology (positive, suspicious) with a sensitivity of 74% (which increased to 90% if atypical included), specificity of 50% and a positive predictive value of 98%. High grade tumors were more common than expected (77% high grade vs. 20% low grade). Abnormal cytology did not predict T stage or tumor grade. Interestingly, positive upper tract cytology was found in all of the UTUC CIS specimen. Conclusions Upper tract cytology has been utilized to support the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Our data demonstrates that abnormal cytology correlates well with the presence of disease but does not predict staging or grading in these respective patients. .

Primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate cancer--do perioperative tumor characteristics correlate with post-treatment biopsy results?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate and predictive factors of positive post-treatment biopsy in men treated with primary cryosurgery for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients treated with primary cryosurgery at a single institution between 1999 and 2012. Perioperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, and number of positive preoperative biopsy cores were obtained and correlated with postoperative biopsy results. Patients were stratified according to the risk classification system of D'Amico to low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups. RESULTS: Sixty-five men were treated with primary cryosurgery, and 57 of 65 (88%) of them underwent postoperative biopsy on average 9 months after the treatment. Eleven of 57 patients (19%) were found to have persistent tumor on post-treatment biopsy. Men who had positive biopsy had significantly higher perioperative PSA levels than men who had negative biopsy (preoperative PSA 12.5 vs 6.2, P = .002; post-operative PSA nadir 4.3 vs 0.71, P = .005); however, no independent predictor was found on a multivariate analysis. Gleason score and number of positive preoperative biopsy cores did not predict tumor persistence. Positive biopsy results were found more often in the intermediate- and high-risk patients, although this was not statistically significant (low risk 9%, intermediate risk 20%, and high risk 27%). CONCLUSION: Perioperative PSA levels, Gleason score, or number of positive pretreatment biopsy cores do not predict failure after primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that physicians, who offer primary cryosurgery to patients with localized prostate cancer, should consider offering post-treatment biopsy to patients to assure adequate cancer control.