Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 80(9): 836-40, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25197864

RESUMO

Though multiple studies have demonstrated superior outcomes amongst adult burn patients at verified burn centers (VBCs) relative to nondedicated burn centers (NBCs), roughly half of such patients meeting American Burn Association (ABA) referral guidelines are not sent to these centers. We sought examine referral patterns amongst pediatric burn patients. Retrospective review of a statewide patient database identified pediatric burn patients from 2000 to 2007 using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9) discharge codes. These injuries were crossreferenced with ABA referral criteria to determine compliance with the ABA guidelines. 1831 children sustained burns requiring hospitalization during the study period, of which 1274 (70%) met ABA referral criteria. Of 557 treated at NBCs, 306 (55%) met criteria for transfer. Neither age, gender, nor payer status demonstrated significant association with treatment center. VBCs treated more severely injured patients, but there was no difference in survival or rate of discharge home from NBCs versus VBCs. Studies to evaluate differences in functional outcomes between pediatric burn patients treated at VBCs versus NBCs would be beneficial to ensure optimization of outcomes in this population.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/terapia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Unidades de Queimados/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimaduras/classificação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am Surg ; 79(9): 875-81, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24069980

RESUMO

Racial and socioeconomic factors may cause barriers to healthcare access that result in delayed treatment. Because perforated appendicitis (PA) in children is thought to result from delays in treatment, it is often used as an index of barrier to access. Recent literature suggests that PA is not an inevitable consequence of delayed treatment, so it may not be the best marker for evaluating such barriers. Therefore we investigated whether racial and socioeconomic factors led directly to delays in treatment. We performed a retrospective study of 667 children undergoing appendectomy in a tertiary care center over 12.5 years. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine if racial and socioeconomic variables were associated with increased risk of PA and increased risk of symptom duration greater than 48 hours. Hispanic children have higher rates of PA regardless of delays in treatment whereas black children had higher PA rates likely due to delays in treatment. These differences were not from socioeconomic factors in our cohort. PA, a heterogeneous disease whose course is determined by multiple factors, is not a good metric for evaluation healthcare disparities in the pediatric population. Delays in treatment may be a more appropriate measure of healthcare inequalities in children.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais Pediátricos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Apendicite/etnologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...