Parameterizing mechanistic niche models in biophysical ecology: a review of empirical approaches.

Mechanistic niche models are computational tools developed using biophysical principles to address grand challenges in ecology and evolution, such as the mechanisms that shape the fundamental niche and the adaptive significance of traits. Here, we review the empirical basis of mechanistic niche models in biophysical ecology, which are used to answer a broad array of questions in ecology, evolution and global change biology. We describe the experiments and observations that are frequently used to parameterize these models and how these empirical data are then incorporated into mechanistic niche models to predict performance, growth, survival and reproduction. We focus on the physiological, behavioral and morphological traits that are frequently measured and then integrated into these models. We also review the empirical approaches used to incorporate evolutionary processes, phenotypic plasticity and biotic interactions. We discuss the importance of validation experiments and observations in verifying underlying assumptions and complex processes. Despite the reliance of mechanistic niche models on biophysical theory, empirical data have and will continue to play an essential role in their development and implementation.

Matrix metalloproteinase and heparin-stimulated serine proteinase activities in post-prostate massage urine of men with prostate cancer.

Proteinases secreted by the prostate gland have a reproductive function in cleaving proteins in the ejaculate and in the female reproductive tract, but some may have a fundamental role in disease and pathological processes including cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in proteinase activities in urine samples collected following prostate massage of men positive (CaP) or negative (no evidence of malignancy, NEM) for biopsy determined prostate cancer. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and serine proteinase activities were detected using protein substrate zymography. There were no differences in activities of MMP-2, proMMP-9, and MMP-9/NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin) complex (gelatin substrate) in men with detected prostate cancer, although the latter two were somewhat diminished. A caseinolytic activity of about 75kDa inhibited by calcium did not differ between the NEM and CaP groups. Heparin stimulated calcium sensitive gelatinolytic activities of approximately 22, 42, and 60kDa, but did not affect activities of MMP-2, MMP-9, or the 75kDa caseinolytic activity. The 22, 42, and 60kDa activities appear to be serine proteinases since they were inhibited by benzamidine. There was a significant decrease in the 22kDa heparin-stimulated serine proteinase activity in urines of men with cancer. Proteinase expression and activities, perhaps in combination with other potential markers, may prove useful in urine for detection and evaluation of prostate cancer.