Efficacy and safety of Artemisinin Combination Therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria across international borders of India.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: Malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) remains a major public threat in India. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been the country's first-line drug for uncomplicated Pf malaria. In 2013-2014, Artesunate plus sulfadoxine (AS+SP) was replaced by Artemether Lumefantrine (AL) as the first- line antimalarial in North East (NE) states of the country which are endemic for Pf malaria. Regular monitoring of antimalarial drugs is of utmost importance to achieve the goal of elimination. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ACT for treating uncomplicated Pf malaria in the NE states of India. METHODS: A prospective study of 28-day follow-up was conducted to monitor the efficacy and safety of AL from 2018-2019 in four districts, Udalgiri, Meghalaya, Lawngtlai, and Dhalai of NE, India. The clinical and parasitological response and the polymorphism analysis of the Pfdhps, P/dhfr, and Pfkelch 13 gene were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were enrolled in the study out of 216 patients who completed the follow-up to 28 days. One-hundred percent adequate clinical and parasitological responses (ACPR) were observed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) correction. The genotype results suggest no recrudescence in the treatment-failure patients. The classical single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the Pfdhfr gene was S108N (94.9%), followed by C59R (91.5%), whereas, in the Pfdhps gene, the common SNP was A437G (79.6%), followed by S3436A. No associated or validated mutations were found in the propeller region of the PfKelch13 gene. INTERPRETATION CONCLUSION: AL was efficacious and safe in uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in North East India. In contrast, mutations in the genes responsible for sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine resistance have been fixed in northeast India's population.

Benefits of Lot Testing to Improve the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in India.

Since 2010, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used to detect malaria. The Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Malaria Research performed lot testing (LT) according to WHO procedures since 2016. Lot testing is performed to evaluate the lot-to-lot variation in performance of malaria RDTs. Four sets of positive quality control (QC) panels for P. falciparum (Pf) and P. vivax (Pv) and 10 negative panels tested RDTs. RDTs were reported as pass, failed, or deferred on the basis of WHO criteria. In the past 5 years, 275 lots containing 15,488 RDT kits for malaria diagnosis were subjected to LT. The monovalent RDTs (n = 1,216), based on either Pf histidine rich protein 2 (HRP2) or Pan-Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (Pan-pLDH) antigens, showed 90.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas RDTs based on HRP2 + Pan-pLDH or HRP2 + pLDH (n = 13,924) had sensitivity 95.6% and specificity 99.5%, respectively. RDTs based on PfHRP2 + Pv-pLDH + Pan-pLDH (n = 348) had 100% sensitivity and specificity. In a comparison between HRP2 + pLDH or HRP2 + Pan-pLDH to HRP2 + pLDH + Pan-pLDH RDTs, it was found that the sensitivity of PfHRP2 with Pan-pLDH RDTs (n = 2,382) was only 83%. Of the 275 lots analyzed, 15 lots of PfHRP2 with Pan-pLDH were deferred. The QC panel for Pf revealed a faint Pan band in the tested lots, which is a cause for concern. The results of deferred lots were reported to concerned government agencies. Quality-compromised RDTs may lead to an incorrect diagnosis. It is critical to have a QC system in place for effective malaria management.

Quality assurance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests: An aid in malaria elimination.

Background & objectives: India targets malaria elimination by 2030 in a phased manner, so malaria's assured diagnosis is crucial. Introduction of rapid diagnostic kits in India in 2010 has revolutionized malaria surveillance. The storage temperature of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), kit components and handling in transportations impact the results of RDTs. Therefore, quality assurance (QA) is required before it reaches end-users. The Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR-NIMR) has a World Health Organization (WHO) recognized lot-testing laboratory facility to assure the quality of RDTs. Methods: The ICMR-NIMR receives RDTs from different manufacturing companies as well as various agencies such as National and State Programmes and Central Medical Services Society. The WHO standard protocol is followed to conduct all the tests, including long-term and post-dispatch testing. Results: A total of 323 lots tested during January 2014-March 2021 were received from different agencies. Amongst them, 299 lots passed the quality of test and 24 failed. In long-term testing, 179 lots were tested and only nine failed. A total of 7741 RDTs were received from end-users for post-dispatch testing of which 7540 qualified the QA test with a score of 97.4 per cent. Interpretation & conclusions: RDTs received for quality testing showed compliance with QA evaluation of malaria RDTs based on the protocol recommended by the WHO. However, continuous monitoring of the quality of RDTs is required under QA programme. Quality-assured RDTs have a major role, especially in areas where low parasitaemia of parasites persists.

A rapid method for DNA Isolation from blood, dried blood spots and rapid diagnosis test.

Background & objectives: Malaria is a parasitic disease spread by Plasmodium parasite. Microscopy, lateral flow devices such as the Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT), molecular methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), isothermal methods such as Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and other diagnostic methods are available for malaria. On the other hand, the accuracy of molecular diagnosis is dependent on genomic DNA isolation. A quick method for isolating and subjectively determining the presence of genomic DNA from blood, dried blood spot (DBS), and rapid diagnostic test (RDT), was identified. Methods: We have developed a protocol for isolating DNA from blood, DBS, and RDTs using the HUDSON Buffer (TCEP and EDTA). Isolated genomic DNA was seen with SYBR Safe DNA stain (1X) under a UV transilluminator without running in 0.8 percent gel electrophoresis or using a spectrophotometer. Results: The technique for DNA isolation was accurate for the presence of malaria parasite genomic DNA from positive samples confirmed by microscopy with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 78.67% and RDT with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 66%. The requirements were minimal, and the process took 30 minutes for a hundred sample processing. Interpretation & conclusion: Finding a fast and reliable method of separating nucleic acids from many samples is crucial. This approach extracts intact genomic DNA in under ten minutes, making it ideal for large-scale investigations.