Distress, concerns and unmet needs in survivors of head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

The aim of this study was to identify the distress, unmet needs and concerns of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors in the first 5 years after treatment. Two hundred and eighty HNC survivors from three Scottish health boards responded to a cross-sectional postal survey in 2011. Questionnaires included the Distress Thermometer, Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) and an adapted version of the PCI to measure unmet needs. One-third of the survivors had moderate or severe levels of distress, and 74% had at least one unmet need. The most common concerns and unmet needs included oral and eating problems, fear of recurrence and fatigue. Multivariate analysis revealed that being younger, out of work (not retired), ever having had a feeding tube fitted, having a greater number of comorbidities and living alone were associated with higher levels of distress, concerns and unmet needs. The diversity of concerns and unmet needs identified in this study highlights the importance of holistic needs assessment as part of follow-up care for HNC survivors with tailoring of support for particular concerns. Specific information resources and self-management strategies are required to help HNC survivors with the practical and functional consequences of HNC treatment.

What is a virtual multidisciplinary team (vMDT)?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs), also known as tumour boards or multidisciplinary case conferences, are an integral component of contemporary cancer care. There are logistical problems with setting up and maintaining participation in these meetings. An ill-defined concept, the virtual MDT (vMDT), has arisen in response to these difficulties. We have, in order to provide clarity and to generate discussion, attempted to define the concept of the vMDT, outline its advantages and disadvantages, and consider some of the practical aspects involved in setting up a virtual MDT. METHODS: This is an unstructured review of published evidence and personal experience relating to virtual teams in general, and to MDTs in particular. RESULTS: We have devised a simple taxonomy for MDTs, discussed some of the practicalities involved in setting up a vMDT, and described some of the potential advantages and disadvantages associated with vMDTs. CONCLUSION: The vMDT may be useful for discussions concerning rare or unusual tumours, or for helping guide the assessment and management of patients with uncommon complications related to treatment. However, the vMDT is a niche concept and is currently unlikely to replace the more traditional face-to-face MDT in the management of common tumours at specific sites.

Low-compliance, volume-controlled, high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation versus conventional ventilation during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Low-compliance, volume-controlled, high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (HFPPV) was compared to conventional intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) immediately before and after surgery in a series of ten patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Direct and indirect hemodynamic and respiratory variables were recorded and calculated. All patients were adequately ventilated with either HFPPV or IPPV. No significant differences in hemodynamic stability were noted either before or after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Airway pressures were lowered significantly by HFPPV as compared to IPPV. This may be useful in cases in which increased airway pressure might be harmful due to decreased venous return and cardiac output (CO).

Continuous flow apneic ventilation.

A study was designed to evaluate the adequacy of gas exchange during continuous flow apneic ventilation (CFAV) in dogs. Seventeen dogs (average weight 22.9 kg) were divided into three experimental groups. Group I (n = 7) was anesthetized, paralyzed and ventilated with air using intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) through a tracheal tube. The tube was removed and each main stem bronchus was cannulated with a 2.5 mm i.d., 4 mm o.d. polyethylene catheter using a fiberoptic bronchoscope. The tracheal tube was replaced to hold the catheters in place. Heated, humidified air was continuously delivered equally to each catheter. Total flows ranged from 8 to 28 l/min (0.4-1.4 l X kg-1 X min-1). Airway pressure (Paw) in the trachea did not exceed 2 mmHg (0.27 kPa). Adequate gas exchange in terms of arterial oxygen and arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pao2 and Paco2) was found after 30 min at flows greater than 16 l X min-1. Group II (n = 7) was managed similarly to the first group, insufflating endobronchial air using the optimal flow of 1.0 l X kg-1 X min-1 obtained from Group I. CFAV continued for 5 h in all animals. Blood gas samples and measurements of systemic blood pressure, heart rate (HR), pulmonary artery blood pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac output (Qt), and temperature were taken every 30 min. Group III (n = 3) was anesthetized similarly to the other groups. Pulmonary gas distribution was evaluated in relation to catheter placement using Xe133. Results showed significant differences between Pao2 values during CFAV and IPPV; however, all animals were adequately oxygenated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Percutaneous transtracheal jet ventilation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: evaluation of a new jet ventilator.

This study compared percutaneous transtracheal jet ventilation (PTJV) at a frequency (f) of 20/min, with high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (HFPPV) at f of 60/min, and endotracheal intubation and intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (ET IPPV) at f of 10/min in apneic dogs. Fifty-four emergency medicine trainees (EMTs) attempted PTJV via a 14-gauge Angiocath attached to a hand-held jet ventilator, f of 20/min, and ET IPPV using an Ambu bag, f of 10/min. Twenty-nine other EMTs attempted cricothyrotomy using a prototype nonkinkable catheter (Arrow) and a new jet ventilator, Bronchovent, f of 60/min, equipped with a pressure sensor which stops ventilation at pressures greater than 20 cm H2O. Adequate oxygenation was achieved by all 3 groups, but only the HFPPV group avoided respiratory alkalosis. There was a higher equipment failure rate (catheter kinking and dislodgment) in the PTJV group. In the HFPPV group, the Bronchovent's pressure-limiting sensor stopped ventilation when the catheter was kinked or out of position, reducing the extent of subcutaneous emphysema and barotrauma. With further catheter improvements, HFPPV Bronchovent may offer a safe and reliable method of ventilating patients during CPR in the field.