Load-Velocity Profiles Before and After Heated Resistance Exercise.

ABSTRACT: Sweet, DK, Qiao, J, Rosbrook, P, and Pryor, JL. Load-velocity profiles before and after heated resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 38(6): 1019-1024, 2024-This study examined neuromuscular performance using load-velocity (L-V) profiles in men and women before and after resistance exercise (RE) in hot (HOT; 40° C) and temperate (TEMP; 21° C) environments. Sixteen (f = 8, m = 8) resistance-trained individuals completed a single 70-minute whole-body high-volume load (6 exercises, 4 sets of 10 repetitions) RE bout in HOT and TEMP. Before and after RE, rectal temperature (TRE), muscle temperature of the vastus lateralis (TVL) and triceps brachii (TTB), and an L-V profile for the deadlift and bench press were recorded. Thermoregulatory and L-V data were analyzed using separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variances (ANOVAs; condition [hot, temperate] and time [pre, post]) with significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. Deadlift peak velocity was reduced at 60% 1 repetition maximum (1RM) after RE in HOT but not TEMP. Peak velocity of 40% 1RM bench press was lower in TEMP vs. HOT pre-RE (p < 0.01). Peak velocity was decreased at all loads in the deadlift L-V profile after RE, regardless of condition. Despite elevated TRE (TEMP; 37.58 ± 0.35, HOT; 38.20 ± 0.39° C), TVL (TEMP; 35.24 ± 0.62, HOT; 37.92 ± 0.55° C), and TTB (TEMP; 35.05 ± 0.78, HOT; 38.00 ± 0.16° C) after RE in HOT vs. TEMP (p < 0.01), RE in HOT did not broadly affect L-V profiles. This indicates heated resistance exercise can be performed with high-volume load and high ambient temperature with minimal performance impairment.

Endocrine Responses to Heated Resistance Exercise in Men and Women.

ABSTRACT: Pryor, JL, Sweet, DK, Rosbrook, P, Qiao, J, Looney, DP, Mahmood, S, and Rideout, T. Endocrine responses to heated resistance exercise in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 38(7): 1248-1255, 2024-We examined the endocrine responses of 16 (female = 8) resistance trained volunteers to a single bout of whole-body high-volume load resistance exercise in hot (HOT; 40° C) and temperate (TEMP; 20° C) environmental conditions. Thermoregulatory and heart rate (HR) data were recorded, and venous blood was acquired before and after resistance exercise to assess serum anabolic and catabolic hormones. In men, testosterone increased after resistance exercise in HOT and TEMP ( p < 0.01), but postexercise testosterone was not different between condition ( p = 0.51). In women, human growth hormone was different between condition at pre-exercise ( p = 0.02) and postexercise ( p = 0.03). After controlling for pre-exercise values, the between-condition postexercise difference was abolished ( p = 0.16). There were no differences in insulin-like growth factor-1 for either sex ( p ≥ 0.06). In women, cortisol increased from pre-exercise to postexercise in HOT ( p = 0.04) but not TEMP ( p = 0.19), generating a between-condition difference at postexercise ( p < 0.01). In men, cortisol increased from pre-exercise to postexercise in HOT only ( p < 0.01). Rectal temperature increased to a greater extent in HOT compared with TEMP in both men ( p = 0.01) and women ( p = 0.02). Heart rate increased after exercise under both conditions in men and women ( p = 0.01), but only women experience greater postexercise HR in HOT vs. TEMP ( p = 0.04). The addition of heat stress to resistance exercise session did not overtly shift the endocrine response toward an anabolic or catabolic response. When acute program variables are prescribed to increase postresistance exercise anabolic hormones, adding heat stress is not synergistic but does increase physiologic strain (i.e., elevated HR and rectal temperature).

Thermoregulation during a six-hour exposure to warm, humid hyperbaric conditions.

Purpose: In a disabled submarine scenario, a pressurized rescue module (PRM) may be deployed to rescue survivors. If the PRM were to become disabled, conditions could become hot and humid exposing the occupants to heat stress. We tested the hypothesis that the rise in core temperature and fluid loss from sweating would increase with rising dry bulb temperature. Methods: Twelve males (age 22 ± 3 years; height 179 ± 7 cm; mass 77.4 ± 8.3 kg) completed this study. On three occasions, subjects were exposed to high humidity and either 28-, 32-, or 35˚C for six hours in a dry hyperbaric chamber pressurized to 6.1 msw. Changes in core temperature (Tc) and body mass were recorded and linear regression lines fit to estimate the predicted rise in Tc and loss of fluid from sweating. Results: Heart rate was higher in the 35°C condition compared to the 28°C and 32°C conditions. Tc was higher in the 32°C condition compared to 28°C and higher in 35°C compared to the 28˚°C and 32°C conditions. Projected fluid loss in all of the tested conditions could exceed 6% of body mass after 24 hours of exposure endangering the health of sailors in a DISSUB or disabled PRM. A fluid intake of 1.0 to 3.5 L would be required to limit dehydration to 2% or 4% of initial mass depending upon condition. Conclusions: Prolonged exposure to 35°C conditions under pressure results in uncompensable heat stress. 32°C and 35°C exposures were compensable under these conditions but further research is required to elucidate the effect of increased ambient pressure on thermoregulation.