Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brain Res ; 549(1): 127-37, 1991 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1680019

RESUMO

The role of the dopaminergic innervation of the medial preoptic-anterior hypothalamus (mPO-AH) in regulating the expression of affective defense behavior in the cat has been investigated in the present study. Feline affective defense behavior, characterized mainly by autonomic arousal, ear retraction, growling, hissing and paw striking, was elicited by electrical stimulation of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH). Following the establishment of a stable threshold current for eliciting the hissing response of the behavior, the effect of injecting various DAergic agonists and antagonists into the mPO-AH on the hissing threshold was determined. The microinjection of the non-selective DA agonist apomorphine (0.03, 0.16, 0.33, 0.66, 1.56 and 3.3 nmol) into the mPO-AH facilitated hissing in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This effect was mimicked by the D2-selective agonist LY 171555 (0.2 and 1.0 nmol) but not by the D1-selective agonist SKF 38393 (1.7 and 17 nmol), and was blocked by the non-selective and the D2-selective antagonists haloperidol (1.3 nmol) and sulpiride (14.5 nmol), respectively. The injection of the D1-selective antagonist SCH 23390 (0.3 nmol), however, did not inhibit apomorphine-induced facilitation of hissing. In addition, the injection of haloperidol (1.3 nmol) and sulpiride (14.5 nmol), but not SCH 23390 (0.3 nmol), alone inhibited the behavior. It was therefore concluded that dopaminergic stimulation of the mPO-AH may facilitate the expression of affective defense behavior in the cat via a D2 receptor-mediated mechanism. The physiological significance of this effect and the interaction between dopaminergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic innervation of the mPO-AH in modulating the expression of affective defense behavior in response to threatening stimuli are discussed.


Assuntos
2,3,4,5-Tetra-Hidro-7,8-Di-Hidroxi-1-Fenil-1H-3-Benzazepina/farmacologia , Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Agressão/efeitos dos fármacos , Apomorfina/farmacologia , Dopaminérgicos/farmacologia , Ergolinas/farmacologia , Hipotálamo Anterior/fisiologia , Área Pré-Óptica/fisiologia , Receptores Dopaminérgicos/fisiologia , Análise de Variância , Animais , Benzazepinas/farmacologia , Gatos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Haloperidol/farmacologia , Hipotálamo Anterior/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Especificidade de Órgãos , Área Pré-Óptica/efeitos dos fármacos , Quimpirol , Receptores Dopaminérgicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Dopamina D2 , Sulpirida/farmacologia
2.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav ; 36(3): 491-9, 1990 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1974065

RESUMO

The role of D1 and D2 dopamine (DA) receptor subtypes in mediating DAergic modulation of affective defense behavior in the cat has been investigated in the present study. Feline affective defense, characterized mainly by autonomic arousal, ear retraction, hissing and paw striking, was elicited by electrical stimulation of the ventromedial hypothalamus. Following the establishment of a stable threshold current for eliciting the hissing response of the behavior, the effect of systemic (IP) administration of various DAergic agonists and antagonists on the hissing threshold was determined. The injection of the nonselective DA agonist apomorphine (1.0, 0.3 and 0.1 mg/kg) facilitated hissing in a dose-related manner. This effect was mimicked by the D-2 selective agonist LY 171555 (0.1, 0.03 and 0.01 mg/kg) but not by the D1-selective agonist SKF 38393 (1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg), and was blocked by the nonselective and the D2-selective antagonists haloperidol (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) and spiperone (0.2 mg/kg), respectively. The D1-selective antagonist SCH 23390 blocked apomorphine-induced facilitation only at a high dose (0.5 mg/kg). In addition, the injection of haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg), spiperone (0.2 mg/kg) or SCH 23390 (0.1 mg/kg) alone inhibited the behavior. It was therefore concluded that DAergic facilitation of affective defense behavior is mainly mediated by the D2 receptors, but that activation of the D1 receptors may play a "permissive" role. The interaction between the D1 and D2 receptors in mediating this facilitation and the behavioral specificity of the effect are discussed.


Assuntos
Mecanismos de Defesa , Dopaminérgicos/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Dopamina , Receptores Dopaminérgicos/fisiologia , Animais , Gatos , Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Masculino , Receptores Dopaminérgicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Dopamina D1 , Receptores de Dopamina D2 , Núcleo Hipotalâmico Ventromedial/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...