A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAs) in serum and plasma with comparison to an immunoassay method in a neonatal population.

The measurement of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAs) is an important second-line test to aid in the diagnosis of premature adrenarche, peripubertal gynaecomastia in males and in identifying the source of elevated androgens in females. Historically, DHEAs has been measured by immunoassay platforms which are prone to poor sensitivity and more importantly poor specificity. The aim was to develop an LC-MSMS method for the measurement of DHEAs in human plasma and serum, develop an in-house paediatric (<6 year old) reference limit and compare the performance against the Abbott Alinity DHEAs immunoassay method. Following pre-treatment with an internal standard, samples were loaded onto EVOLUTE® EXPRESS ABN plate. Analytes were separated with reverse-phase chromatography using ACQUITY® UPLC® HSS T3 2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.8 µm column. Mass spectrometry detection was performed using a Waters® Xevo TQ-XS in electrospray negative mode. For the paediatric reference range, samples were collected from an inpatient setting (age ≤ 6 years old) with no evidence of adrenal dysfunction or history of/current steroid use. The method comparison was performed using samples from this cohort aged between 0 and 52 weeks. The assay demonstrated linearity up to 15 µmol/L (r2 > 0.99) with a functional sensitivity of 0.1 µmol/L. Accuracy results revealed a mean bias of 0.7% (-14% to 15%) when compared against the NEQAS EQA LC-MSMS consensus mean (n = 48). The paediatric reference limit was calculated as ≤ 2.3 µmol/L (95% C.I. 1.4 to 3.8 µmol/L) for ≤ 6 year olds (n = 38). Comparison of neonatal (<52 weeks) DHEAs with the Abbott Alinity revealed that the immunoassay ran at a 166% positive bias (n = 24) which appeared to lessen with increasing age. Described is a robust LC-MSMS method for the measurement of plasma or serum DHEAs validated against internationally recognised protocols. Comparison of paediatric samples of <52 weeks against an immunoassay platform demonstrated that in the immediate new-born period results generated from the LC-MSMS method offer superior specificity than an immunoassay platform.

Readiness to participate in advance care planning: A qualitative study of renal failure patients, families and healthcare providers.

Objectives Advance care planning is the process by which people reflect upon their wishes and values for healthcare, discuss their choices with family and friends and document their wishes. Readiness represents a key predictor of advance care planning participation; however, the evidence for addressing readiness is scarce within the renal failure context. Our objectives were to assess readiness for advance care planning and barriers and facilitators to advance care planning uptake in a renal context. Methods Twenty-five participants (nine patients, nine clinicians and seven family members) were recruited from the Southern Alberta Renal Program. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed and then analyzed using interpretive description. Results Readiness for advance care planning was driven by individual values perceived by a collaborative encounter between clinicians and patients/families. If advance care planning is not valued, then patients/families and clinicians are not ready to initiate the process. Patients and clinicians are delaying conversations until "illness burden necessitates," so there is little "advance" care planning, only care planning in-the-moment closer to the end of life. Discussion The value of advance care planning in collaboration with clinicians, patients and their surrogates needs reframing as an ongoing process early in the patient's illness trajectory, distinguished from end-of-life decision making.

Comparison of eight routine unpublished LC-MS/MS methods for the simultaneous measurement of testosterone and androstenedione in serum.

BACKGROUND: Liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has become the method of choice in steroid hormone measurement. However, little information on the mutual agreement of LC-MS/MS methods is available. We compared eight routine unpublished LC-MS/MS methods for the simultaneous measurement of testosterone and androstenedione. METHODS: Sixty random serum samples from male and female volunteers were analysed in duplicate by eight routine LC-MS/MS methods. We performed Passing-Bablok regression analyses and calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients to assess the agreement of the methods investigated with one published method known to be accurate. Intra-assay CV of each method was calculated from duplicate results, recoveries for each method were calculated from six spiked samples. Furthermore, a CV between the investigated methods was calculated. RESULTS: The concentrations ranged from 0.05-1.26 nmol/L, 6.15-24.44 nmol/L and 0.15-4.78 nmol/L for testosterone in females, testosterone in males and androstenedione, respectively. The intra-assay CVs were between 3.7-16.0%, 0.9-5.2% and 1.2-9.5% for testosterone in females, testosterone in males and androstenedione, respectively. The slopes of the regression lines ranged between 0.90-1.25, 0.87-1.24 and 0.94-1.31 for testosterone concentrations in females, all testosterone values and androstenedione, respectively. Inter-method CVs were 24%, 14% and 29% for testosterone for concentrations in females and males and androstenedione, respectively. These compare unfavourably to the variation found earlier in published methods. CONCLUSION: Although most routine LC-MS/MS methods investigated here showed a reasonable agreement, some of the assays showed a high variation. The observed differences in standardization should be taken into account when applying reference values, or should, preferably, be solved.