Cost-effective analysis of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

The main objective of the study was to perform the pharmacoeconomic analysis of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A prospective, observational study was conducted in 98 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients meeting 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria. Treatment-naive RA patients were initiated on synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD/s) and followed up for 3 months. Average cost-effectiveness analysis was done by taking Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score as a measure of effectiveness. Out of the 98 RA patients, 15.30% were males and 84.69% females. 80.61% RA patients are seropositive. Majority of the study population patients (55%) were on combination of three synthetic DMARDs and almost a quarter (24.48%) were on combination of two synthetic DMARDs. The mean value of DAS 28 at baseline was 6.07 ± 1.33 and after 3 months treatment, the mean was 3.84 ± 1.11. The mean disability index measured by HAQ-DI was significantly reduced from 1.43 ± 0.71 to 0.81 ± 0.61, p < 0.001, after 3 months treatment. The direct medical cost of treatment of RA per month is 997.05 rupees. The average cost-effectiveness ratio of combination of synthetic DMARDs was 1533.92 rupees. Treatment of RA with synthetic DMARDs controls disease activity and improves disability with reasonable cost of treatment. The majority of the direct medical cost is attributable to cost of medicine and laboratory investigation. Use of quality generic drugs and an early diagnosis would minimize the economic burden on the patient.

Predictors of autonomic neuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Autonomic dysfunction occurs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the association between the autonomic dysfunction and inflammation has not been investigated in RA. We investigated the relationship between inflammation and ANS function in RA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 25 RA patients and 25 age and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Autonomic function assessed by five cardiovascular reflex tests according to Ewing. Parasympathetic dysfunction established by applying three tests: heart rate response to deep breath (HRD) and standing (HRS) and Valsalva tests. Sympathetic dysfunction examined by applying two tests: BP response to standing and handgrip test. Peripheral sympathetic autonomic function assessed by Sudoscan through measurement of electrochemical skin conductance of hands and feet. Sudoscan investigates the sweat gland activity and used as a surrogate to study the damage of sympathetic sudomotor nerves in neuropathy. It is an indirect assessment tool of sudomotor function. Disease-specific and inflammatory measures (DAS 28, ESR, CRP, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1) were determined. RESULTS: RA patients had significantly impaired HRD, HRS, BP response to hand grip and sudomotor function as compared to healthy controls. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly higher in RA as compared to healthy controls (p<0.05). DAS 28 significantly correlated with HRD in RA. ESR significantly correlated with HRD and HRS. TNF-α significantly correlated with HRD, HRS, BP response to standing and sudomotor function. Significant correlation was found between IL-6 and HRS. Seropositive patients had more pronounced CAN and sudomotor dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Autonomic dysfunction in RA is related to disease activity, seropositivity and pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs improve cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a significant risk predictor for sudden cardiac death in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. As yet, there is no therapeutic treatment of CAN in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Even now, the impact of the most commonly employed disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy on CAN in PsA is not known. Hence, we investigated the impact of DMARDs on CAN in PsA. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 20 patients of PsA and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. CAN was diagnosed by applying the five cardiovascular reflex tests according to Ewing. Parasympathetic dysfunction was established by performing three tests: heart-rate response to deep breathing, standing, and Valsalva tests. Sympathetic dysfunction was examined by applying two tests: blood pressure response to standing, and handgrip tests. Disease severity was assessed by the 28-joint-count disease activity score (DAS-28) and the disease activity score in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA). RESULTS: Cardiovascular reflex tests were impaired significantly among the PsA patients compared with well-matched healthy subjects (p < 0.05). Parasympathetic dysfunction was more prominent than sympathetic dysfunction. After 12 weeks treatment, parasympathetic dysfunction (heart rate response to deep breath and standing) significantly (p < 0.05) improved in patients with PsA, while there was no significant improvement in sympathetic function. CONCLUSION: These study results suggests parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction is more prominent than sympathetic dysfunction in PsA. Synthetic DMARDs improved parasympathetic dysfunction in PsA.

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs improve autonomic neuropathy in arthritis: DIANA study.

Autonomic neuropathy (AN) is a risk predictor for sudden cardiac death in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, the impact of most commonly employed disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy on autonomic neuropathy in rheumatic diseases is not known. Hence, we investigated the efficacy of DMARDs on autonomic neuropathy in RA and AS. We performed autonomic function assessment in 60 patients in this open-label, 12-week pilot study including 42 patients with RA, 18 with AS, and 30 aged-matched healthy subjects. The methodology included assessment of cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests according to Ewing. Parasympathetic dysfunction was established by performing three tests: heart rate response to deep breathing, standing, and Valsalva tests. Sympathetic dysfunction was examined by applying two tests: blood pressure response to standing and handgrip tests. Sudomotor function was assessed by Sudoscan. Cardiovascular reflex tests were impaired significantly among the patients as compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05). Autonomic neuropathy was more pronounced in biologic-naive RA and AS patients. After treatment with combination synthetic DMARDs, parasympathetic, and sudomotor dysfunction significantly (p < 0.05) improved in RA and AS. Biologic DMARDs significantly improved parasympathetic, sympathetic and peripheral sympathetic autonomic neuropathy (p < 0.05) in biologic-naive RA and AS patients. In conclusion, synthetic DMARDs improved parasympathetic and sudomotor dysfunction in both DMARD-naive RA and AS patients. However, biologic DMARDs improved parasympathetic, sympathetic and sudomotor dysfunction to a greater extent than synthetic DMARDs in both RA and AS patients.

Minocycline improves peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: MIND study.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic autonomic neuropathy are serious and common complications of diabetes associated with increased risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minocycline in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. In a randomized placebo controlled study, 50 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg minocycline or placebo. Outcome measures included the vibration perception threshold (VPT), Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), beck depression inventory (BDI), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and autonomic neuropathy, assessed by cardiovascular reflex tests according to Ewing and peripheral sympathetic autonomic function was assessed by FDA approved Sudoscan. At baseline there were no significant differences between demographic variables and the neuropathy variables in the minocycline and placebo groups. After treatment, VPT significantly improved in the minocycline group as compared to the placebo group. Mean posttreatment scores on the LANSS, PDI and HAQ were significantly lower in the minocycline group compared with the placebo group. However, BDI and VAS significantly (p = 0.01) improved in both minocycline and placebo groups (Table 2). After treatment with minocycline, heart rate (HR) response to standing significantly improved, while there was a borderline significance toward a reduction in HR response to deep breath. These finding indicate that 6-week oral treatment with minocycline is safe, well tolerated and significantly improves peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients.