RESUMO
The aim of this research was to evaluate the mechanical impact of utilizing different fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) systems to reinforce inlay-retained bridges in dissected lower molars with different levels of periodontal support. A total of 24 lower first molars and 24 lower second premolars were included in this study. The distal canal of all molars received endodontic treatment. After root canal treatment, the teeth were dissected, and only the distal halves were kept. Standardized class II occluso-distal (OD) (premolars) and mesio-occlusal (MO) (dissected molars) cavities were prepared in all teeth, and premolar-molar units were created. The units were randomly distributed among four groups (n = six/group). With the aid of a transparent silicone index, direct inlay-retained composite bridges were fabricated. In Groups 1 and 2, both discontinuous (everX Flow) and continuous (everStick C&B) fibers were used for reinforcement, while in Groups 3 and 4, only discontinuous fibers (everX Flow) were used. The restored units were embedded in methacrylate resin, simulating either physiological periodontal conditions or furcation involvement. Subsequently, all units underwent fatigue survival testing in a cyclic loading machine until fracture, or a total of 40,000 cycles. Kaplan-Meyer survival analyses were conducted, followed by pairwise log-rank post hoc comparisons. Fracture patterns were evaluated visually and with scanning electron microscopy. In terms of survival, Group 2 performed significantly better than Groups 3 and 4 (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the other groups. In the case of impaired periodontal support, a combination of both continuous and discontinuous short FRC systems increased the fatigue resistance of direct inlay-retained composite bridges compared to bridges that only contained short fibers. Such a difference was not found in the case of sound periodontal support between the two different bridges.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Molar MOD (mesial-occlusal-distal) cavity preparation weakens relative cuspal stiffness by up to 63%, often resulting in cuspal fracture. This investigation inspects fracture resistance of MOD cavities restored using direct composite restoration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 extracted, intact mandibular molars were selected. MOD cavities with different depth/wall thickness were prepared in 9 groups (n = 12): A: 3 mm/3.5 mm, B: 3 mm/2.5 mm, C: 3 mm/1.5 mm, D: 5 mm/3.5 mm, E: 5 mm/2.5 mm, F: 5 mm/1.5 mm, G: 7 mm/3.5 mm, H: 7 mm/2.5 mm, I: 7 mm/1.5 mm. Specimens with 7 mm deep cavities received root canal treatment. The teeth were restored with dental composite. Maximal fracture strength test was conducted. Intact natural teeth were used as control. For statistical analysis Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with post-hoc pairwise comparisons was used (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Significant difference was indicated between the control and groups D, E, F, G, H, and I. No significant differences were found between the A, B, C groups and the control. Comparing the 5 and 7 mm cavity depth groups, there was no statistical difference between any of them. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this investigation, the following conclusions can be drawn regarding molar teeth with a MOD cavity: 3 mm or shallower cavities can be restored to the physiological fracture strength with direct composite restorations; 5 mm or deeper cavities cannot be restored to the physiological fracture strength with direct composite restorations. Cusp thickness does not significantly influence fracture strength in molar MOD cavities with a direct composite restoration.
