Rural-urban and gender differences in procedures performed by family practice residency graduates.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the types of procedures performed and obstetrical care provided by family practice residency graduates, by practice location and physician gender METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of 702 graduates who completed family practice residency programs in Alberta, Canada, from 1985 to 1995, inclusive. Graduates were asked to indicate which of 28 procedures and 7 obstetrical care practices they performed. The data were analyzed by gender and current practice location. RESULTS: A total of 442 (63%) of the graduates responded to the survey. The top five procedures performed by family practice graduates were minor office surgery, foreign body removal (eye), joint aspiration, joint injection, and anterior nasal packing. There was a declining trend in the number of procedures performed by family practice graduates from rural, to regional, to metropolitan areas. Relatively more males performed procedures; however, more females did IUD insertion and obstetrical care practice. Except for a few exceptions, a similar proportion of male and female graduates in rural practice performed procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The procedural and obstetrical care pattern of practice differs between family practice graduates in rural and urban areas, as well as between male andfemale graduates. Family practice residency programs should consider additional training in procedural skills for those planning to practice in rural areas, as well as encourage females to become skilled at performing procedures relevant to family practice.

Location of family medicine graduates' practices. What factors influence Albertans' choices?

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors that influence family medicine graduates' choice of practice location. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective survey employing a self-administered, mailed questionnaire. SETTING: Family medicine residency programs at the University of Alberta (U of A) and the University of Calgary (U of C) in Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: Graduates (n = 702) who completed the family medicine residency program at U of A or U of C between 1985 and 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current practice location; 23 factors influencing current practice location; physicians' sex; community lived in until 18 years of age. RESULTS: Response rate was 63% (442 graduates completed the questionnaire). Overall, the most influential factors in attracting graduates to their current practice locations were spousal influence, type of practice, and proximity to extended family. Type of practice, income, community effort to recruit, medical need in the area, and loan repayments had a substantial influence on family physicians' decisions to practise in rural areas. Male physicians ranked type of practice, whereas female physicians ranked spousal influence, as having the most influence on choice of practice location. Significantly more female than male physicians identified working hours, familiarity with the medical community or resources, and availability of support facilities and personnel as having a moderate or major influence on their decisions. CONCLUSION: Differences between rural and metropolitan residents and between sexes affect family medicine graduates' choices of practice location. These differences should be taken into account in recruitment strategies.

Use of walk-in clinics by rural and urban patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare use of walk-in clinics by rural and urban family practice patients and to describe patients' perceptions of the quality of care in physicians' offices. DESIGN: Questionnaire completed by patients in family physicians' offices. SETTING: Nine community-based family practices located in rural and urban areas of Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had visited their family physicians' offices during April, May, June, or July 1997. Response rate was 89.6% (403 of 450 questionnaires were completed). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of walk-in clinics, patients' perceptions of the quality of care in physicians' offices. RESULTS: Overall, 27.5% of patients (22.2% of rural, 35.5% of urban patients) attended walk-in clinics in the 6 months before visiting their family physicians' offices: 43.3% went during weekdays when their family physicians' offices were open. Significantly more rural (91.1%) than urban (60.7%) patients felt they could contact their doctors during evenings and weekends (P.004). Significantly more urban (67.2%) than rural (33.3%) patients did not call their own physicians before going to walk-in clinics (P.002). Patients who attended walk-in clinics were more likely (P.01) than patients who did not to rate their family physicians' office hours poor to good (27.9% vs 15.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients attending the offices of community-based family physicians in both urban and rural areas of Alberta also attend walk-in clinics. Family practice patients attend walk-in clinics primarily because their own physicians' offices are less convenient.

Admissions and transfers from a rural emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of patients transferred from a rural hospital emergency department, to compare them with patients admitted on an emergency basis, and to use this information to help plan physician education. DESIGN: Descriptive study using records for the period January 1, 1991, to June 30, 1992. SETTING: The emergency department at Bonnyville Health Centre, an acute care rural hospital located 240 km northeast of Edmonton, serving a catchment population of approximately 10,000. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand fifty-five patients seen in the emergency department who were either transferred to another centre or admitted to the Bonnyville Health Centre on an emergency basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For the transferred group, main diagnosis, category of transfer, and reason for transfer. For the admitted group, main diagnosis, length of stay, type of discharge. RESULTS: Of the 1055 patients ill enough to be either admitted or transferred, 114 (10.8%) were transferred. Those transferred were predominantly men, the elderly, and people with orthopedic injuries or neurologic diseases. Those admitted presented primarily with internal, respiratory, gynecologic, or pediatric disorders. Reason for transfer was mainly lack of specialized services or equipment at the rural hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred out of the emergency department differed from those admitted in diagnoses and sex. Most transfers were considered "mandatory." Results of this analysis supported incorporating a formal rotation in orthopedics and adding 4 weeks to the existing emergency medicine rotation in our family medicine residency program.

Continuity of care. Opportunity for residents to see repeat patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the opportunity for first-year family medicine residents to experience continuity of care during family medicine block time and half-day returns. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patient encounter data during the 1987-1988 and 1991-1992 academic years to determine how much contact residents had with repeat patients. SETTING: Two family medicine teaching centres in Edmonton. PARTICIPANTS: First-year family medicine residents: 24 residents during 1987-1988 and 24 during 1991-1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patient-resident contacts and number of repeat contacts. RESULTS: During the 4-month block time and half-day return, residents had repeat contact with 25.9% and 20.3% of the patients seen. These patients provided 48.3% and 37.7% of all visits at Centres A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increasing block time from 2 to 4 months resulted in only a slight increase in repeat contact with patients. Half-day returns did not appear to enhance the opportunity for continuity of care.

Putting prevention into practice.

In primary medical care settings, disease prevention services are delivered at lower rates than recommended. Furthermore, practitioners tend to overestimate the rate at which they perform them. There are essentially two steps in delivering evidence-based preventive services: (1) knowing what the evidence is for performing various detection and intervention manoeuvres, and (2) integrating the preventive services into daily practice. The first is a scientific process and is carried out in Canada by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. However, after a decade of experience with evidence-based guidelines, we now know that guidelines are not enough. Integrating clinical prevention into busy practices is a political and logistical process. This truth is best captured by the quip, "An ounce of prevention requires a pound of office system change". A number of studies have demonstrated that continuing medical education (CME) courses and workshops for physicians are not enough to ensure that clinical preventive services are incorporated into practice. According to Lomas, the traditional CME educational approaches need to be complemented by strategies from such paradigms as the social influence model, the diffusion of innovation model and the adult learning model. Battista, in "From Science to Practice," points out the complexity of the communication process required for the diffusion of innovation into practice. Walsh's Systems Model of Clinical Preventive care best captures the interacting factors that mediate between practitioners' intentions and their actions when it comes to delivering clinical prevention services. This paper reports on a practical example of helping family practitioners develop a "sustaining office system in prevention" that minimizes barriers, focuses energy and integrates clinical prevention into office routines. The key components are (i) a practice coordinator for prevention, (ii) clear clinical prevention-related job descriptions for all persons who deal with patients, (iii) an information management system that reinforces prevention, and (iv) a practice feedback and problem solving strategy.

Profile of rural physicians in alberta.

A questionnaire was mailed to 564 rural Alberta physicians to determine the demographic profile of practising rural physicians, to identify factors that attracted and retained physicians in rural practice, and to identify the skills that newly trained general practitioners require for rural practice. Rural-based physicians were relatively young (50% below the age of 38 years) and predominantly male (86%). Approximately 73% were general practitioners without certification by the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and 19% were family physicians with certification. Compared with the Canadian-trained physicians (56%), foreign-trained rural physicians (44%) tended to be older, to have been longer than 10 years in rural practice, and to have had more than four years of postgraduate training. The major reasons for contemplating leaving rural practice were retirement, career advancement or limited challenge, and heavy work-load.

Response to treatment and its influence on survival in metastatic breast cancer.

The clinical response to first systemic therapy of 381 patients with metastatic breast cancer was assessed; the influence of the category of this first response on eventual survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis was analyzed. Survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis was found to be similar whether the patient had a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease; only when progressive disease occurred with first systemic treatment was survival significantly shortened. This similarity in survival whatever the category of response from diagnosis of first distant metastases was found whether the patient received chemotherapy or hormone therapy as first systemic treatment, and whether the patient was premenopausal or postmenopausal; there was some suggestion on analysis of premenopausal patients treated with hormone therapy as first systemic therapy that a complete response conferred a survival advantage, but the numbers were small in this group. When complete responders to first systemic therapy as well as any other subsequent systemic therapy were analyzed for survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis, again, no survival advantage could be found compared to the other response categories, but the complete response rate was low owing to the unselected nature of this group of study patients. It is concluded that the categories of complete, partial, or stable response to therapy have no great significance in terms of survival; the category of progressive disease to first systemic therapy is, however, associated with a shorter survival in all the analyses performed. We suggest that assessment of a treatment's worth should be based as much on the patient's subjective feeling of well-being as on the magnitude of the tumor response, since with currently available therapies, provided some form of response is obtained, the magnitude of the response does not appear to translate into any major survival advantage. This study points up the disparity between research-oriented criteria of response (survival, response rate, and its magnitude) and patient care criteria of response (survival and quality of life).

Brain metastases in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

A retrospective analysis was performed comparing the incidence of brain metastases as a site of first recurrence in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy during the period from 1973--1979 for node-positive operable carcinoma of the breast, compared to a matched control group of patients presenting during the same period treated by local measures only. Five of 115 patients (4.3%) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have had brain metastases as first site of distant recurrence compared to zero of 115 (0%) in the control group. This comprised 12.8% of first distant recurrences in the adjuvant group. The authors suggest that this increased incidence of brain metastases, as site of first recurrence, reflects prolonged suppression of systemic disease by adjuvant chemotherapy with less effect in controlling metastases in the brain.

Effect of chemotherapy on survival in metastatic breast cancer.

In order to assess the impact of modern combination chemotherapy on overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients, we retrospectively analysed survival data of those patients who presented with breast cancer and developed metastases at our clinic from 1971-78 inclusive. Our results indicate a trend towards improved survival from onset of first distant metastasis after 1975. Assessment of survival by treatment modality revealed significantly longer survival from first metastasis for those patients receiving predominantly endocrine treatment compared to chemotherapy, median survival being 32.5 versus 23 months for endocrine therapy and chemotherapy respectively. Patients receiving adriamycin in combination with other drugs, had longer survival from first metastasis than those patients receiving chemotherapy without adriamycin (median survival being 25 versus 18.5 months respectively). These differences are most probably due to patient selection. On the basis of these results it would appear that chemotherapy may be improving short-term survival in some patients, but is making no major impact on long-term survival.