Relative Change in NT-proBNP Level: An Important Risk Predictor of Cardiovascular Congestion in Haemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have shown that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its N-terminal fragment (NT-proBNP) are predictive of cardiovascular death in haemodialysis (HD) patients. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that monitoring NT-proBNP measurements adds further prognostic information, i.e. predicts congestive heart failure (CHF) events. METHODS: In a prospective cohort of 236 HD patients, NT-proBNP levels were measured monthly during 18 months. Patients were divided according to the occurrence of CHF events. In a nested case-control study, we assessed the evolution of NT-proBNP levels. RESULTS: On average, the 236 HD patients were followed up for 12.5 months, a period during which 44 patients developed a CHF event (half requiring hospitalisation). At baseline, patients who developed a CHF event had significantly more dilated cardiomyopathy and/or altered left ventricular ejection fraction and higher NT-proBNP levels compared with patients who did not develop a CHF event. During follow-up, we observed a significant increase in NT-proBNP levels preceding the CHF event. At a 20% relative increase of NT-proBNP, the sensitivity of NT-proBNP as a predictor of CHF events was 0.57 and the specificity 0.77. CONCLUSION: The relative change in NT-proBNP levels is a significant risk predictor of a CHF event.

Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be optimized with individualized doses based on therapeutic monitoring of its active metabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA). In this 12-month study, 137 renal allograft recipients from 11 French centers receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine A, MMF and corticosteroids were randomized to receive either concentration-controlled doses or fixed-dose MMF. A novel Bayesian estimator of MPA AUC based on three-point sampling was used to individualize doses on posttransplant days 7 and 14 and months 1, 3 and 6. The primary endpoint was treatment failure (death, graft loss, acute rejection and MMF discontinuation). Data from 65 patients/group were analyzed. At month 12, the concentration-controlled group had fewer treatment failures (p = 0.03) and acute rejection episodes (p = 0.01) with no differences in adverse event frequency. The MMF dose was higher in the concentration-controlled group at day 14 (p < 0.0001), month 1 (p < 0.0001) and month 3 (p < 0.01), as were median AUCs on day 14 (33.7 vs. 27.1 mg*h/L; p = 0.0001) and at month 1 (45.0 vs. 30.9 mg*h/L; p < 0.0001). Therapeutic MPA monitoring using a limited sampling strategy can reduce the risk of treatment failure and acute rejection in renal allograft recipients 12 months posttransplant with no increase in adverse events.

Detection of ganciclovir resistance after valacyclovir-prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients with active cytomegalovirus infection.

Whether valaciclovir (VCV) prophylaxis could be responsible for ganciclovir (GCV)-resistance of Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in transplantation has never been documented. A multicentric retrospective pilot study was undertaken to detect GCV-resistance through mutations within the UL97 gene in renal transplant recipients who experienced active HCMV infection and received valacyclovir prophylaxis. Twenty-three patients who experienced HCMV antigenaemia or DNAemia during or at the end of prophylaxis were included. UL97 genotyping was carried out on peripheral blood samples, using a nested in-house PCR, which amplified the full-length UL97 gene. One patient has a resistance-related mutation (M460I); the major risk factor for emergence of resistance in this patient was the presence of early and persistent antigenaemia. GCV-resistance during VCV-prophylaxis was rare after renal transplantation. However, special attention must be paid to patients developing early active HCMV infection under prophylaxis.

Thrombotic microangiopathy and digital necrosis: two unrecognized toxicities of gemcitabine.

We report one new case of hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and one case of digital necrosis after treatment with gemcitabine (Gemzar). Case 1, a 34-year-old man, was given first-line metastatic treatment with gemcitabine for a adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. After a cumulative dose of 10 000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, the onset of subacute renal failure associated with hemolytic anemia of mechanical origin was observed. A diagnosis of probable gemcitabine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy was arrived at. Symptoms resolved after stopping the chemotherapy, in spite of the progression of the disease. Case 2, a 61-year-old man, was administered a combination of gemcitabine and a platinum salt as first-line metastatic treatment for carcinoma of the bladder urothelium. Following a cumulative dose of 10 000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine, the patient suffered from bilateral peripheral vascular disease of somewhat acute onset with hemorrhagic lesions of the finger pads that became necrotic. The work-up was negative and a causal relationship was attributed to gemcitabine. The patient made good progress when given an i.v. infusion of Ilomedine (iloprost trometamol) and chemotherapy was withdrawn. We conclude that gemcitabine must be added to the list of drugs that cause HUS and necrotizing vasculitis.

Plasma levels and metabolism of AcSDKP in patients with chronic renal failure: relationship with erythropoietin requirements.

N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (AcSDKP) is a physiological inhibitor of hematopoiesis that is maintained at stable levels in normal plasma. Its degradation in vivo and in vitro by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) accounts for the high plasma concentrations of AcSDKP in patients treated with ACE inhibitors. Because ACE inhibitors can induce anemia in some patients, we measured plasma AcSDKP concentrations in 176 patients with chronic renal failure: 120 hemodialysis (HD) and 56 nondialysis (nD) patients, 39 of whom were administered ACE inhibitors. We studied the relationships between AcSDKP levels, hematologic parameters, and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) requirements in these patients. AcSDKP levels were significantly greater in HD (10.3 +/- 3.9 pmol/mL) and nD (3.1 +/- 1.8 pmol/mL) patients not administered ACE inhibitors than controls (1.8 +/- 0.2 pmol/mL). In all patients, treatment with ACE inhibitors significantly increased these levels fourfold. HD sessions significantly decreased AcSDKP concentrations by 66% and reduced the predialysis in vitro half-life of AcSDKP (270 +/- 109 minutes) to values (182 +/- 67 minutes) not significantly different from those of controls or nD patients. Most HD patients treated with ACE inhibitors had AcSDKP levels greater than 24 pmol/mL (the greatest concentration found in other nD and HD patients). Only in this group of patients did weekly doses of rHuEPO correlate with AcSDKP levels. Our results show that renal function is essential to maintain stable AcSDKP plasma levels, and at high levels, AcSDKP acts as a uremic toxin causing partial resistance to erythropoietin and inhibiting erythropoiesis.