Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 270(1): 107-11, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22382399

RESUMO

Olfactory dysfunction is a frequent symptom of nasal and sinunasal disease. Many of these patients undergo nasal sinus or nasal septum surgery. In this study, we evaluated the benefit of nasal surgery on olfactory function over a period of 12 months. Patients included in this study underwent either nasal sinus or nasal septum surgery. All patients were tested for olfactory function using the "Sniffin' sticks" 16 item odor identification test. In addition, patients were asked to rate their nasal patency as well as their olfactory function at each visit. 157 patients were tested 3.5 months after surgery and 52 patients were tested again 12 months after surgery. Olfactory function improved significantly 3.5 months after surgery in patients, who received nasal sinus surgery; no significant increase was found in patients treated with nasal septum surgery. At the 12-month follow-up, the increase in olfactory function over all patients just missed statistical significance. Individually, however, 19% of the patients exhibited improvement after 3.5 months and 17% after 12 months. These numbers increased in patients with rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, who exhibited improvement of 30% after 3.5 months, and 32% after 12 months. Nasal sinus surgery produced an increase in measured olfactory function, but not nasal septum surgery. This increase appeared to be stable over the examined period of 12 months.


Assuntos
Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Transtornos do Olfato/cirurgia , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Endoscopia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Odorantes , Transtornos do Olfato/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Limiar Sensorial , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Biochem Biophys Methods ; 70(6): 1283-6, 2008 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17988746

RESUMO

Workers involved in the manufacture of drug substances may be exposed to active pharmaceuticals by inhalation of drug dusts or droplets which has been considered the main exposure route. The proposed HPLC method allowed to determine sulpiryde, hydroxyurea and dyprophylline in the concentration range of 0.01-0.187 mg/m3, 0.001-0.08 mg/m3 and 0.01-0.40 mg/m3 for sulpiryde, hydroxyurea and dyprophylline, respectively, when 480 L of air sample was collected on the glass fibre filters. Sulpiryde was extracted with a solvent system consisting of acetonitrile-phosphate buffer at pH 3 (85:15, v/v), while the best efficiency of extraction for hydroxyurea and dyprophylline was achieved using water. HPLC analysis of sulpiryde with fluorescence detection was more sensitive (LOD=3.1 microg/L) in comparison with UV detection (LOD=84.4 microg/L).


Assuntos
Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Gases/química , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Preparações Farmacêuticas/química , Estrutura Molecular , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...