Multi-parametric functional hemodynamic optimization improves postsurgical outcome after intermediate risk open gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (pGDT) using flow monitoring has been associated with improved outcomes. However, its protocols are often based on stroke volume only: as a target for fluid loading, inotropic support and vasopressors (via mathematical coupling of systemic vascular resistance). In this trial, we have tested the multi-parametric pGDT protocol based on esophageal Doppler variables (corrected flow time, peak velocity) in intermediate-to-high risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: Intermediate-to-high risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were randomized to standard care (control) or multi-parametric pGDT (intervention). Postoperative complications and death rate as well as hospital length of stay were assessed as primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 140 patients (intervention, N.=71, and control, N.=69) were included and randomized out of 197 eligible. Higher vasoactive/inotropic drug use and lower fluid balance were observed in the intervention group leading to favorable hemodynamic profile. The pGDT intervention was associated with improved primary outcome (28 days mortality and morbidity defined as occurrence of any defined complication) - 20 patients (28.2%) versus 32 (46.4%) in the control group (P=0.036); RR 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39-0.95), P=0.03. No differences in mortality and hospital length of stay were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this monocentric trial the multi-parametric pGDT protocol based on domain specific functional hemodynamic parameters was associated with lower rate of postoperative complications in intermediate-to-high risk patients undergoing scheduled gastrointestinal procedures.

Role of heart-rate variability in preoperative assessment of physiological reserves in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery (MAS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of heart-rate variability (HRV) concerning development of postoperative complications in patients undergoing MAS. The secondary objectives were to identify the relationship of HRV and use of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and hospital length of stay (H-LOS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients scheduled for elective MAS were enrolled in a prospective, single-center, observational study. HRV was measured by spectral analysis (SA) preoperatively during orthostatic load. Patients were divided according to cardiac autonomic reactivity (CAR; n=23) and non-cardiac autonomic reactivity (NCAR; n=30). RESULTS: The final analysis included 53 patients. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding type of surgery, use of minimally invasive techniques or epidural catheter, duration of surgery and anesthesia, or the amount of fluid administered intraoperatively. The NCAR group had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss than the CAR group (541.7±541.9 mL vs 269.6±174.3 mL, p<0.05). In the NCAR group, vasoactive drugs were used during anesthesia more frequently (n=21 vs n=4; p<0.001), and more patients had at least one postoperative complication compared to the CAR group (n=19 vs n=4; p<0.01). Furthermore, the NCAR group had more serious complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade III n=6 vs n=0; p<0.05) and a greater number of complications than the CAR group (n=57 vs n=5; p<0.001). Significant differences were found for two specific subgroups of complications: hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs (NCAR: n=10 vs CAR: n=0; p<0.01) and ileus (NCAR: n=11 vs CAR: n=2; p<0.05). Moreover, significant differences were found in the ICU-LOS (NCAR: 5.7±3.5 days vs CAR: 2.6±0.7 days; p<0.0001) and H-LOS (NCAR: 12.2±5.6 days vs CAR: 7.2±1.7 days; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative HRV assessment during orthostatic load is objective and useful for identifying patients with low autonomic physiological reserves and high risk of poor post-operative course.

[Anticytokine therapy in sepsis and why it fails]. / Anticytokinová terapie u sepse a príciny jejího selhání.

Anticytokine therapy in sepsis belongs to a subgroup of therapeutic interventions referred to as antiinflammatory or immunomodulatory strategies in the intensive care literature. Between the mid-1980s and the late 1990s, this approach was considered very promising. Against all expectations, it proved ineffective or even harmful in many cases. However, the recent literature is suggestive of a renewed interest in the topic. Therefore, we attempted at a retrospective search for causes of the failure.