Stem cells in acute kidney injury repair.

New discoveries and developments in the biology and propagation of stem cells have fueled a whole new field of Medicine that has sparked great interest in the scientific community as well as in the general media and public. Stem cells are a very prominent and debated topic and have given ground to a new field of therapy in Medicine, which is called Regenerative Medicine. The kidney is a highly sophisticated and complicated organ, yet stem cell therapies have become of interest to Nephrologists and promising animal data are available showing the use of different stem cell populations in Nephrology. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical entity caused by a variety of factors resulting in renal damage and loss of function. Although it is reversible up to a point, it contributes tremendously to hospital morbidity and mortality. At the current time there are only supportive treatments available. Stem cell based therapies have the potential to become a broader and diverse treatment approach that is tailored to the pathophysiology of the disease and is therefore potentially more effective than traditional pharmacological approaches. The current article gives an overview about the field in general as well as potential treatment approaches and mechanisms.

In vivo T cell depletion with pretransplant anti-thymocyte globulin reduces graft-versus-host disease without increasing relapse in good risk myeloid leukemia patients after stem cell transplantation from matched related donors.

One-hundred and two patients with good risk myeloid leukemia (CML first chronic phase or AML first CR) were transplanted from HLA-related donors after conditioning with (n = 45) or without anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (n = 57). One graft failure was observed in the non-ATG and none in the ATG group. The median time to leukocyte engraftment (> 1 x 10(9)/l) was 16 (range 12-33) in the ATG group and 17 days (range 11-29) in the non-ATG group (NS) and for platelet engraftment (> 20 x 10(9)/l) 24 and 19 days (P = 0.002), respectively. Acute GVHD grade II-IV was observed in 47% of the non-ATG and in 20% of the ATG group (P = 0.004). Grade III/IV GVHD occurred in 7% of the ATG and in 32% of the non-ATG group (P = 0.002). Chronic GVHD was seen in 36% and 67% (P = 0.005), respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range 2-128), the 5-year estimated OS is 66% (95% KI: 51-81%) for the ATG group and 59% (95% KI: 46-72%) for the non-ATG group (NS). The 5-year estimated DFS is 64% (95% KI: 50-78%) for ATG and 55% (95% KI: 43-67%) for the non-ATG regimen (NS). The 5-year probability of relapse was 5% in the ATG and 15% in the non-ATG group (NS). ATG as part of the conditioning regimen leads to a significant reduction in GVHD without increase of relapse in patients with myeloid leukemia after stem cell transplantation from HLA-related donors.

Molecular methods for detection and quantification of myeloma cells after bone marrow transplantation: comparison between real-time quantitative and nested PCR.

Multiple myeloma is characterized by malignant plasma cell-infiltration of bone marrow. Treatment with high-dose therapy results in a high rate of clinical remissions, but almost all patients ultimately relapse. Clinical staging and detection of relapse are limited in sensitivity. Therefore, we established molecular methods based on the highly clone-specific CDR regions of the immunoglobulin VH locus for sensitive and specific detection of residual myeloma cells after bone marrow transplantation. VDJ rearrangements were identified using a set of VH primers and a JH primer. Clone-specific rearrangements were detected by comparison with germ-line sequences. With the nested PCR approach, first-round amplification with the consensus primers was done followed by second amplification with myeloma-specific primers. The real-time quantitative PCR was performed using a myeloma-specific forward primer in combination with a JH consensus TaqMan probe and reverse primer. Sensitivity was tested using dilutions of myeloma cell lines into mononuclear cells. Nested PCR had a sensitivity of 10(-6) and TaqMan PCR of 10(-4) to 10(-5). Specificity was determined by testing different cell lines and patients' probes. These results were confirmed by follow up of 2 patients after allogeneic transplantation with dose-reduced conditioning. Molecular methods are very sensitive and specific tools for follow up of myeloma patients after allogeneic transplantation. By using the quantitative approach, it is possible to see kinetics of bone marrow tumor load, which can be used to guide therapeutic decisions like donor leukocyte infusions (DLI).

Disseminated breast cancer cells prior to and after high-dose therapy.

Women with breast cancer in a distinct stage of disease can benefit from high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell support; however, a significant number of these patients relapse despite this intensive treatment. This study investigates the persistence of malignancy on the single-cell level. A total of 194 data sets consisting of bone marrow and blood samples obtained prior to and after HDT and of aliquots of apheresis products were searched with immunocytochemistry and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for disseminated cancer cells. Presence of cancer cells in the marrow is frequent prior to and after HDT, but HDT reduces the amount of malignant cells in marrow significantly. In contrast, there was no effect on the number of circulating cancer cells. Reinfusion of contaminated apheresis products was surprisingly associated with a low number of malignant cells in bone marrow after HDT and vice versa. The impact of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, apheresis, and peripheral blood on disease-free survival after HDT could be investigated in a total of 165 samples. Surprisingly, neither the presence of tumor cells in marrow or blood nor in apheresis was associated with a bad prognosis in Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. These results suggest that apheresis products and bone marrow should be regarded as different biological compartments for epithelial cancer cells. It can be concluded that complete elimination of disseminated cancer cells by HDT is not always possible. The theory of reinduction of metastatic breast cancer by accidentally reinfused contaminants is not supported by this study so far. However, further research is necessary to identify distinct cell populations with the potentially capacity to metastasize.

Influence of preharvest tumor cell contamination in bone marrow or blood does not predict resultant tumor cell contamination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells.

Tumor cell contamination of stem cell collections harvested from breast cancer patients is a common phenomenon described by several investigators but with findings that vary among reports. Although so-called co-mobilization of these cells has been hypothesized, the origin of tumor cell contamination in stem cells is still unknown. A total of 47 G-CSF mobilized stem cell grafts from patients with nodal-positive (n = 30), chemosensitive metastatic (n = 11), and 5 women with inflammatory breast cancer were evaluated for cancer cells by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, 40 bone marrow aspirations and 23 peripheral blood samples collected prior to apheresis and after one to two cycles of conventional chemotherapy were available for examination. Tumor cell contamination of leukapheresis correlated best with preharvest blood state. This was valid when the nominal (positive/negative) presence of tumor cells in blood was compared to the nominal presence of tumor cells in apheresis samples and when the it was correlated to the tumor cell load of apheresis samples (TCL = tumor cells per 10(6) nucleated cells investigated). The correlation between blood and stem cells was better (nominal and quantitative) than that between marrow and stem cells, despite the larger sample size of marrow aspirations. The presence or absence of cancer cells in apheresis samples could not be safely predicted by the presence or absence of tumor cells in marrow or blood alone. Diagnostic specificity seems to improve from a combination of results from marrow and blood analysis. No correlation was found in quantitative analysis of tumor cell contamination between marrow and blood. In conclusion, the results suggest that blood and bone marrow represent different compartments for epithelial cancer cells and that contaminating tumor cells in stem cell harvests may be derived from the blood and/or marrow compartment. The tumor cell contamination of a stem cell harvest cannot be safely predicted by a preceding blood or marrow analysis.

Urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor expression on disseminated breast cancer cells.

Disseminated tumor cells are detected frequently in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood cell products of women undergoing high-dose therapy for breast cancer. Several attempts were made to purge autografts from contaminating cancer cells; however, the biological and clinical impact of these contaminations has not been clarified so far. Expression of distinct phenotypes is a surrogate marker for metastatic behavior of cancer cells. The expression of the urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor seems to be a factor of high importance. It is not expressed by normal mammary tissue. Disseminated cancer cells from marrow, blood, and stem cell products have been investigated by double-stain technique for urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) expressing cytokeratin-positive cells. uPA-R(+)/CK(+) cells could be found in all qualities of samples; however, significantly less in G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared to samples of other provenance (p = 0.02). It can be concluded that epithelial cells of malignant phenotype occur in blood, marrow, and autografts of breast cancer patients. Populations of disseminated tumor cells are phenotypically heterogeneous. Reduced uPA-R expression on cancer cells from leukapheresis samples might suggest a less aggressive nature of these cells compared to disseminated cells found in bone marrow. Furthermore, the data suggest that the phenotype of tumor cell contamination in leukapheresis products differs significantly from those of disseminated cancer cells in bone marrow or blood.

Immunomagnetic tumor cell selection--implications for the detection of disseminated cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for the detection of disseminated epithelial cancer cells has not yet been found. The standard method, using immunocytochemistry, offers a sensitivity of up to 10(-6). Molecular methods such as cytokeratin-19 RT-PCR are about 10 times as sensitive, but they are hampered by interference such as illegitimate gene expression. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Immunomagnetic bead selection of epithelial cancer cells using conjugates directed against the human epithelial antigen (HEA) followed by immunocytochemistry testing was investigated in this trial. RESULTS: No cytokeratin-positive cells could be enriched from 56 control samples. In 104 clinical samples of bone marrow aspirations, PBPC collections, and venous blood obtained from breast cancer patients, the cytokeratin-positive rate increased significantly, from 29.9 percent before selection to 54.8 percent after enrichment. Even the yield of detected cancer cells was significantly higher after selection. Up to 2.5 x 10(8) MNCs were easily processed. However, the mean cancer cell recovery after HEA enrichment was only 24.4 percent. Subsequently, selected epithelial cells were successfully immunophenotyped by use of a double-stain technique detecting cytokeratin-positive cells and the urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor. CONCLUSION: HEA bead selection in combination with the standard immunocytochemistry method is a powerful and specific tool for the detection of disseminated cancer cells without false-positive results. Furthermore, it delivers enough cells for subsequent investigations such as characterization studies.

Tumour cell detection in G-CSF mobilised stem cell harvests of patients with breast cancer.

Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilised with G-CSF from steady-state haemopoiesis after previous anthracyclin-containing standard dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer. 48 samples were obtained from patients with stage II-III breast cancer and > or = 10 lymph nodes, 15 samples from patients with chemotherapy sensitive metastatic disease, and 13 samples from women with inflammatory breast cancer. 44 samples were first or single leukaphereses and 32 samples were second or third harvests. Aliquots were searched for contaminating tumour cells by immunocytochemistry (IC) and cytokeratin-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction rtPCR). The median count of MNCs examined by IC was 2 x 10(6); cDNA prepared from 2 x 10(7) cells was subjected to PCR. Fifty-nine samples were examined by immunocytochemistry, 36 samples by rtPCR, and 19 samples by both techniques. Samples investigated by IC and rtPCR were judged as positive if there was at least one positive test. On the whole, 42/79 (55.3%) of the samples were positive with an insignificant trend to a higher positivity rate in second or subsequent leukaphereses (52.3% vs 59.3%). The median tumour cell load per 10(6) MNCs was low with 0.5 (0-7) cells in all, and a total of 2.2 (0.5-7) cells in positive specimen. Differences in the cancer cell load of first and subsequent leukaphereses and between subgroups of patients were not found. PCR and IC gave consistent results in 63.2%. This phenomenon can be explained by the greater sensitivity of the molecular method and by a Poisson distribution of coharvested tumour cells in samples. Tumour cell contamination in G-CSF mobilised stem cells from patients with breast cancer from steady state haemopoiesis after preceding anthacyclin-containing chemotherapy is frequent, but the tumour cell load is low. To allow a comparison of different studies dealing with cancer cell contamination in stem cells, standardisation of assays is necessary.

Improvement of breast cancer cell detection by immunomagnetic enrichment.

BACKGROUND: Contaminating breast cancer cells in leukapheresis harvested for reinfusion to rebuild hemopoiesis after high-dose therapy have been described by several investigators. Methods for tumor cell detection are conventional immunocytochemistry, culture techniques and reverse transcriptase PCR. The percentage of tumor cell positive leukaphereses shows a wide variation. An approach to clarify if these cells can induce systemic relapse is to characterize them molecular-genetically and immunologically, but these techniques require a sufficient cell count. METHODS: We compared conventional immunocytochemistry with immunocytochemistry after immunomagnetic enrichment of cancer cells by HEA-125 magnetic microbeads for the detection of micrometastatic tumor cells. A total of 25 samples, consisting of 16 samples from G-CSF-mobilized peripheral stem cell harvests, eight BM aspirations and one peripheral blood sample were investigated without [median 2, range 1-3 x 10(6) MNCs] and after [median 5, range 1-10 x 10(7) MNCs] HEA-microbead selection. Additionally 10 buffy coat samples from healthy subjects were investigated. RESULTS: Using conventional immunocytochemistry, tumor cells could be detected in nine stem cell samples. Two BM samples and the blood sample (48%) were positive, with a median tumor cell load of 0 (0-12) cells per sample (mean: 2.4). By HEA-bead selection the rate of positivity could be increased to 88% (13 stem cell samples, eight marrow samples and one blood sample) with a median load of 6 (0-47) (mean 10.6) suspected cells (p < 0.007). However, calculation of recovery revealed tumor cell losses by immunobead selection. False positive results were not seen. DISCUSSION: We conclude first that immunomagnetic selection is an excellent and highly sensitive tool to enrich contaminating cancer cells from marrow and stem cell samples; second that the existence of real tumor cell negative stem cell harvests is doubtful; and third that immunobead selection delivers sufficient tumor cell counts for their further characterization by molecular and immunological methods.