Surgical Technique for Draining a Concomitant Supra-and Infratentorial Epidural Hematomas.

AIM: To assess clinical and radiological characteristics of simultaneous acute supra- and infratentorial epidural hematomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 18 patients with a concomitant acute supra- and infratentorial epidural hematoma, who were treated and followed up at our hospital. RESULTS: The Glasgow Coma Score was 3-8 in four patients, was 9-12 in seven, and was 13-15 in seven patients. While the concomitant supra- and infratentorial hematoma did not cross the midline in 15 of the patients, it did in three of them. The dural venous sinus rupture was repaired in five of the patients. Functional healing was observed in 14 of the 18 patients. Two of the patients died during the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: A simultaneous supra- and infratentorial epidural hematoma rarely occurs in neurosurgical practice. Mortality and morbidity rates are high if these are not addressed in time. The radiological images of patients should be evaluated carefully preoperatively. In patients with a concomitant infra- and supratentorial hematoma, transverse sinus damage, which is a surgical challenge, should be considered. Herein, we describe a surgical technique (supra- and infratentorial craniotomy leaving the bone bridge over the transverse sinus) for draining a concomitant supra- and infratentorial epidural hematoma; this technique is an effective surgical choice in select patients.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Disc Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiological outcome and development of heterotopic ossification (HO) following single-segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc replacement (CDR) for cervical disc herniation and evaluate their impact on surgical success. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Neurosurgery Department at Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, between January 2020 and June 2022. METHODOLOGY: Patients aged 18-70 years with radicular neck pain unresponsive to conventional medical treatment and an MRI-confirmed diagnosis were included. Patients with osteoporosis (OP) were excluded. Patients were randomised into two treatment groups (ACDF and CDR) and stratified by age and symptom severity. Radiographic assessments and HO classification according to McAfee were performed. RESULTS: Among the included patients, 56 underwent ACDF and 45 underwent CDR. The mean patient age was 48.29 ± 9.530 and 41.84 ± 7.239 years in the ACDF and CDR groups, respectively (p <0.001). The postoperative disc height increased in both groups. The T1 slope was significantly higher preoperatively and in the early postoperative period in the CDR group than in the ACDF group (p = 0.001). HO was graded as 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 28 (27.7%), 6 (5.9%), 7 (6.9%), and 4 (3%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: ACDF and CDR provided similar improvements in radiological measurements and pain relief. Although both procedures significantly enhanced the patient's quality of life and disability scores, HO was more prevalent following CDR during long-term follow-up. KEY WORDS: Cervical disc replacement, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Spinal surgery techniques, Heterotopic ossification.