Development and internal validation of clinical prediction models for outcomes of complicated intra-abdominal infection.

BACKGROUND: Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with cIAI in a multicentre study and to develop clinical prediction models (CPMs) to help identify patients at risk of mortality or relapse. METHODS: A multicentre observational study was conducted from August 2016 to February 2017 in the UK. Adult patients diagnosed with cIAI were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to develop CPMs for mortality and cIAI relapse. The c-statistic was used to test model discrimination. Model calibration was tested using calibration slopes and calibration in the large (CITL). The CPMs were then presented as point scoring systems and validated further. RESULTS: Overall, 417 patients from 31 surgical centres were included in the analysis. At 90 days after diagnosis, 17.3 per cent had a cIAI relapse and the mortality rate was 11.3 per cent. Predictors in the mortality model were age, cIAI aetiology, presence of a perforated viscus and source control procedure. Predictors of cIAI relapse included the presence of collections, outcome of initial management, and duration of antibiotic treatment. The c-statistic adjusted for model optimism was 0.79 (95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 0.87) and 0.74 (0.73 to 0.85) for mortality and cIAI relapse CPMs. Adjusted calibration slopes were 0.88 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 0.90) for the mortality model and 0.91 (0.88 to 0.94) for the relapse model; CITL was -0.19 (95 per cent c.i. -0.39 to -0.12) and - 0.01 (- 0.17 to -0.03) respectively. CONCLUSION: Relapse of infection and death after complicated intra-abdominal infections are common. Clinical prediction models were developed to identify patients at increased risk of relapse or death after treatment, these now require external validation.

Intra-arterial methylene blue injection into ex vivo colorectal cancer specimens improves lymph node staging accuracy: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: A randomized controlled trial was carried out to study the effect of a recently proposed technique of ex vivo intra-arterial methylene blue injection of the surgical specimen removed for colorectal cancer on lymph node harvest and staging. METHOD: Between May 2012 and February 2013, 100 consecutive colorectal cancer resection specimens in a single institution were randomly assigned to intervention (methylene blue injection) and control (standard manual palpation technique) groups before formalin fixation. The specimen was then examined by the histopathologist for lymph nodes. RESULTS: Both groups were similar for age, sex, site of tumour, operation and tumour stage. In the intervention group, a higher number of nodes was found [median 23 (5-92) vs. 15 (5-37), P < 0.001], with only one specimen not achieving the recommended minimum standard of 12 nodes [1/50 (2%) vs. 8/50 (16%), P = 0.014]. However, there was no upstaging effect in the intervention group [23/50 (46.0%) vs. 20/50 (40.0%); P = 0.686]. With a significantly lower number of nodes harvested in rectal cancer, the positive effect of the intervention was particularly observed in the patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy [median 30 nodes (12-57) vs. 11 (7-15); P = 0.011; proportion of cases with < 12 nodes 0/5 vs. 5/8 (62.5%), P = 0.024]. CONCLUSION: Ex vivo intra-arterial methylene blue injection increases lymph node yield and can help to reduce the number of cases with a lower-than-recommended number of nodes, particularly in patients with rectal cancer having neoadjuvant treatment. The technique is easy to perform, cheap and saves time.

Comparative study of safety and outcomes of single-port access versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Single-port access (SPA) offers cosmetic advantages in addition to the well-recognised benefits of conventional multi-port laparoscopic (CL) surgery, and can be carried out using standard straight instruments. We report the outcomes of our early experience with SPA colorectal resections in comparison with CL surgery. METHODS: We compared the following data, patient characteristics, operating time, morbidity, operative mortality, length of hospital stay and tumour variables, of patients who underwent SPA right, left, sigmoid and total colon resections, as well as high anterior resections and panproctocolectomies, with that of patients who underwent equivalent conventional laparoscopic (CL) operations. The 40 SPA and 78 CL patients studied underwent surgery between February 2008 and September 2011. RESULTS: There was no difference between the SPA and CL operations, as regards the patient's sex (55.0 vs. 62.8% males, p = 0.411), comorbidity (ASA I 10.0 vs. 12.8%; ASA II 57.5 vs. 59.0%; ASA III 32.5 vs. 25.6%; ASA IV 0 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.722) and body mass index (26.2 vs. 28.0 kg/m(2), p = 0.073). However, SPA patients were younger (mean age 54.1 vs. 64.8 years, p = 0.001), and malignancy was a less common indication for surgery (25.0 vs. 71.8%, p < 0.001). There were no conversions to open surgery, and one death occurred in the CL group (1.3%). Mean operating time (162 vs. 170 min, p = 0.547), median post-operative hospital stay (4 vs. 4 days, p = 0.255) and morbidity (7.5 vs. 12.8%, p = 0.538) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: SPA laparoscopic surgery appears safe in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, with no increase in operating time, length of stay, morbidity and mortality. Selection of patients with indications for surgery for benign disease may be of importance to ensure an oncologically safe initial uptake of SPA colorectal practice.

Single-port access laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation.

BACKGROUND: Single-port access offers cosmetic advantages in addition to the well-recognized benefits of standard multiport laparoscopic surgery, and can be performed with the use of standard straight instruments. We describe a technique of single-port access reversal of Hartmann colostomy by use of the colostomy site for access. METHODS: After routine skin preparation and laparoscopic setup, the colostomy is mobilized from its mucocutaneous border, and the anvil of a circular stapler is secured to the distal lumen. By the use of a GelPoint system with 3 or 4 trocars, the intra-abdominal adhesions are divided and the splenic flexure is mobilized to achieve sufficient access to the abdominal and pelvic cavities and proximal colonic mobility. The rectal stump is mobilized to the mid rectum, starting from the posterior mesorectal fascia around to the anterior rectal wall. A tension-free colorectal anastomosis is secured with a standard circular stapling device inserted transanally, and leak tested. The colostomy wound is closed in standard fashion. RESULTS: Five patients underwent single-port access reversal of Hartmann resection (4 diverticular perforations and 1 pT3N0 colon cancer), with a mean operating time of 155 (range, 137-187) minutes and a median length of stay of 3 (range, 2-11) days. There were no conversions, major surgical morbidity, or deaths. CONCLUSION: Single-port access reversal of Hartmann colostomy through the stoma site is safe, and it offers additional cosmetic advantages with no apparent additional morbidity in comparison with standard multiport surgery.

Dual interventional approach of endoscopic reboring in completely stenosed rectal anastomosis using radiology guidance: a novel technique.

OBJECTIVE: Rectal stricture/stenosis is a well-recognized complication following anterior resection. Completely stenosed rectal anastomoses have been conventionally treated conservatively with permanent stoma. The surgical alternatives are either a redo low resection with its accompanying hazards or formation of a permanent colostomy. We describe a simple method of treating anastomotic stenoses using a novel technique in patients with a defunctioned bowel. METHOD: Three patients with complete stenosis of a rectal anastomosis following anterior resection underwent this novel technique with informed consent. A stenosis with no identifiable lumen was diagnosed at the time of examination under anaesthetic (EUA) or by contrast enema. Using a novel technique of combined endoscopic and radiology guidance, the anastomotic stenosis was rebored and subsequently dilated to restore bowel continuity. RESULTS: There were no complications observed following this procedure. Two of the three patients needed repeat endoscopic dilatation. All patients had restoration of the lumen in the anastomosis and subsequently underwent closure of ileostomy and made an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSION: Combined endoscopic dilatation under radiological guidance is a novel technique and appears to be a simple, safe, effective and inexpensive method for treating rectal anastomotic stenoses.

Is anaemia relevant in the referral and diagnosis of colorectal cancer?

OBJECTIVE: Current efforts to improve the outcome from colorectal cancer aim to shorten the delay between referral and diagnosis. Investigation of iron-deficiency anaemia has a high yield for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancy and its presence is included in current referral guidelines. We explored the relationship between anaemia and colorectal cancer. METHOD: We reviewed hospital and laboratory database records of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between January 2003 and June 2004. The site of colorectal cancer was correlated with the presence of anaemia at the time of referral. Anaemia was defined according to local practice (Hb < 12.0 g/dl in females and <13.0 g/dl in males), compared with the threshold recommended in current national referral guidelines (Hb < 10 g/dl in females and <11 g/dl in males). RESULTS: Over 18 months, 143 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Anaemia was present in 48% of males and 50% of females using local practice and 24% of males and 16% of females using national referral guidelines. Those with right-sided and non-rectal cancers were significantly more likely to be anaemic than those with left-sided and rectal cancers, respectively. CONCLUSION: In approximately half of cases the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is not associated with anaemia. Anaemia is more common with proximal lesions but this is not a consistent finding. The current threshold for anaemia at which national guidelines suggest referral also appears to be insensitive.

Prospective audit of quality of colonoscopy in a surgical coloproctology unit.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively audit the quality of colonoscopy and patient acceptance in a Surgical Coloproctology Unit over a one-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 202 consecutive colonoscopies were evaluated over a 12-month period performed by a Consultant, Specialist Registrars and Research fellows. Data where recorded for adequacy of bowel preparation, completion rate, adequacy of sedation, patient tolerance and duration of the procedure. Adequacy of bowel preparation was monitored by scoring bowel content and the percentage of bowel wall visualised. Patients completed a questionnaire to express their sedation satisfaction, discomfort during the procedure and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: The success rate of bowel preparation was 94%. Completion rate was 90% in intended full colonoscopies by the Consultant and Registrars and 74% by more junior grade endoscopists (overall 86%). The mean dose of midazolam and pethidine was higher in patients with unsatisfactory sedation than those with satisfactory sedation. The pain score was higher when trainees performed the procedure than when performed by the Consultant. Fourteen patients refused to undergo the procedure again due to procedure discomfort (n = 7), inadequate sedation (n = 2) and bowel preparation discomfort (n = 5). CONCLUSION: A high completion rate was achieved, compared with published results. However, further improvements are possible especially by improving the performance of junior endoscopists and by ensuring optimal bowel preparation. Patients' tolerance of colonoscopy was highly acceptable but may also be improved by the same methods.

Thyroid aspiration cytology in Newcastle: a six year cytology/histology correlation study.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established technique for pre-operative investigation of thyroid nodule(s). Thyroid FNAC was introduced in the teaching hospitals of Newcastle upon Tyne in 1981, initially with a small group of clinicians as aspirators. Audit results for 1981-1986 inclusive showed an unsatisfactory rate of 25.3% and prediction of malignancy with a sensitivity of 93.5%. FNAC has become more popular locally for the investigation of thyroid disease and the number of clinicians performing aspirates has increased. The results for recent years have, therefore, been audited. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for 239 patients with a dominant thyroid nodule who had FNAC carried out in the 6 year period 1990-1995 and subsequent partial or complete thyroidectomy. RESULTS: Histology of thyroid specimens showed 60 follicular adenomas and 34 malignant lesions (including 19 papillary, 10 follicular and 3 medullary carcinomas, one lymphoma and one follicular neoplasm with indeterminate malignant potential). A total of 302 FNAC had been carried out on these 239 patients. On cytological grounds the unsatisfactory sample (AC0 and AC1) rate was 43.1% on initial aspiration which was reduced to 32.2% on repeated aspiration. FNAC predicted neoplasia (AC3, AC4 and AC5) with a sensitivity of 86.8%, a specificity of 67.0%, a negative predictive value of 87.5% and a positive predictive value of 65.5%. Malignancy was predicted by FNAC (AC3, AC4 and AC5) with a sensitivity of 88.9%. A FNAC report of AC5 had a positive predictive value for malignancy of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: FNAC is an invaluable and minimally invasive procedure for the pre-operative assessment of patients with a dominant thyroid nodule. It is, however, important that the number of aspirators and cytopathologists be kept small to maintain expertise and also that the results of FNAC be subjected to ongoing audit.

Drains for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy: fact or fiction?

BACKGROUND: Many authorities advocate draining the neck routinely after thyroid and parathyroid surgery with no scientific evidence to support this practice. We aimed to establish if the routine use of drains following thyroid/parathyroid surgery is of any value. METHOD: Medical records of patients who underwent thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy under the care of a single endocrine surgeon (GP) over a 14-year period were reviewed. For the first 6 years, the neck was routinely drained (drain group) and for the subsequent 8 years the neck was only drained if the surgeon felt it necessary according to the operative situation (selective group). RESULTS: A total of 606 procedures (425 thyroidectomy and 181 parathyroidectomy) were performed on 582 patients. Drains were routinely used in 134 (22%) procedures (drain group) and were selectively used in 472 (78%) (selective group) of which 191 (40%) were drained. In all patients, there was a significant increase in the rate of postoperative bleeding/haematoma in patients with a drain (8/314 versus 1/282, Fisher's exact, P < 0.05). Wound infection occurred only in the patients with a drain. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding and airways obstruction between the drain and selective groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the routine use of neck drains is unnecessary and may indeed be harmful, drain insertion being associated with an increased incidence of wound infection. Drains should, therefore, be used selectively after thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy.

The clinical terms project: its potential for computerised surgical audit.

Computerised surgical audit requires accurate and detailed clinical information on individual patients. This requires a standardised language which can be understood and used by both clinicians and computers. The present system of classifying patients using OPCS and ICD coding systems does not allow this because both are awkward and imprecise. The clinical terms project was set up to overcome these problems. Its aim was to develop a complete medical thesaurus of terms which medical and paramedical disciplines could use in their own practice. To audit activities in general surgery one needs to be able to record diagnostic information, operative procedures, investigations, therapeutic actions, non-operative procedures, etc. Such information needs to be recorded with various levels of detail depending on the degree of specialisation of the surgeon involved (eg, a general versus a highly specialised surgeon). In addition data needs to be cross-mapped to national classification systems (ICD, OPCS). To provide the level of clinical detail required it has been found necessary to separate terms into a 'main core term' and 'qualifying terms'. This has resulted in a shorter but more comprehensive thesaurus of clinical terms which will enable rapid and consistent data transfer between different computer systems.