Discriminant analysis in allergic rhinitis and asthma: methacholine dose-response slope allows a good differentiation between mild asthma and rhinitis.

Asthma and rhinitis frequently coexist in allergic patients, but nasal symptoms may predominate, leading to asthma underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Discriminant analysis obtains the best differentiation between groups using one or one set of variables. Our aim was to identify the laboratory test [allergen exposure, total and specific serum IgE, lung function, blood eosinophils and, bronchial response and sensitivity to methacholine (Mth) and allergen] or combination of them that allowed the best differentiation between mild asthma and allergic rhinitis. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in 86 Dermatophogoides pteronyssinus allergic rhinitis patients, who were classified according to clinical data as rhinitis plus mild asthma (n = 62) or "pure" rhinitis (n = 24). Bronchial symptoms had been exhaustively evaluated during a 2-years pre-inclusion period. Patients underwent skin tests and bronchial challenge with Mth and allergen. The exposure to D. pteronyssinus allergen (Der pl) was quantified in dust samples. Dose-response curves with Mth [until the FEV1 fell by 40% or the maximal dose (200 mg/ml) was inhaled] were attained. We developed multiple models of discriminant analysis in order to evaluate the capacity of the above variables to differentiate groups. Asthma patients had higher total and specific IgE levels and a greater sensitivity (PD20 values) and response [dose-response slope (DRS)] to both Mth and allergen. The model entering these variables was the one that correctly classified more patients (79.2%). The discriminative power of the model that only included Mth-DRS values was similar to the above (78.8%). Bronchial response to Mth is quantitatively different in allergic rhinitis patients who display mild asthma symptoms when compared to those that only report rhinitis, suggesting a distinct bronchial intrinsic behavior. The utilization of complete dose-response curves with Mth allows a good separation between mild asthma and "pure" rhinitis patients and might be useful in the diagnosis of mild asthma. Whether the early detection and treatment of these patients prevents the development of symptomatic asthma needs further evaluation.

Determinants of allergen-induced late bronchial responses in mild asthmatics.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the baseline factors influencing the occurrence and magnitude of immediate- and late-phase responses in asthmatic patients after an allergen-induced bronchial provocation test (A-BPT). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis in a homogenous group of 31 mild, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-allergic patients with asthma. SETTING: Allergy Department, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona, Spain. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed an asthma symptom questionnaire and underwent skin tests, sputum induction, and methacholine bronchial provocation test. The A-BPT was performed on a separate day. Sputum cell profile and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin-5 levels were quantified in the entire sputum supernatant. Assays were done for eosinophils in blood, and/or ECP, and total and specific IgE levels in serum. Exposure to D pteronyssinus major allergens (Der p1 and Der 2) was measured by an assay based on monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: A-BPT findings were positive in all patients, and late-phase responses were detected in 29%. Late responders were exposed to higher levels of Der p1 (p = 0.028), had greater levels of ECP (p = 0.007) and albumin (p = 0.019) in sputum, and showed a trend toward higher lymphocyte numbers (p = 0.053) in sputum than isolated early responders. The allergen-induced provocative dose that induced a fall in FEV(1) values > or =20% from the postdiluent values correlated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (r = 0.36). The late-phase response magnitude correlated with Der p1 exposure (r = 0.49) and showed a trend toward correlation with sputum ECP levels (r = 0.38). CONCLUSION: Factors involved in the development of allergen-induced immediate- and late-phase responses are different. Allergen natural exposure might prime the infiltration of the airway by activated inflammatory cells enhancing the appearance and the severity of late-phase responses.