[Examination of Analytical Method for Mothproofing Agents to Revise the Official Methods Based on "Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances"].

In Japan, the use of mothproofing agents [dieldrin and 4,6-dichloro-7-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)-2-trifluoromethylbenzimidazole; DTTB] in textiles is regulated by the Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances. Since official analytical methods for these agents have been in place for approximately 40 years, we developed an improved method in a previous study. In the present study, we validated this method. Accordingly, six laboratories analyzed the sample prepared at 3 µg/g (1/10 of the regulation value) and 30 µg/g (the regulation value). The high accuracy of the results for these samples in almost all the cases (accuracy: 70-120%, repeatability: <10%, reproducibility: <15%), confirmed the validity of the method. In addition, we examined three samples that were distributed before the introduction of the regulation. The analysis results for these samples showed little variation between laboratiories, indicating that our method is also applicable to actual samples. Meanwhile, the quantitative value was clearly lower in one laboratory than in the others. We presumed that the enhanced effect of the sample matrix (matrix effect) on the internal standards in GC-MS analysis was the main cause for this trend. Therefore, we examined the analytical method using polyethylene glycol 300 (PEG) as an analyte protectant. As PEG minimized the GC-MS response difference between the standard solution and the matrix-containing solution, GC-MS analysis with PEG would be useful for matrix effect measurements in this method.

[Examination of Analytical Methods for Methanol, Trichloroethylene, and Tetrachloroethylene to Revise the Official Methods Based on the Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances].

In Japan, the use of methanol, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene in aerosol household products is banned under the Act on the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances. As the official analytical methods for testing for these substances have not been revised for over 35 years, several issues have been pointed out. Thus, we developed a new method to revise the official method in our previous study. In this study, validation of the proposed method for detecting the target substances was conducted using two aerosol-product samples (A and B), which contained methanol, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene. Sample A comprised regulated values of these compounds, while sample B comprised one-tenth of the regulated amounts. They also contained several volatile compounds that served as interfering substances. Subsequently, the samples were analyzed using head space/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and it was confirmed that the three target substances were separated from the other chemicals on chromatograms. Validation tests were conducted at seven laboratories to evaluate the proposed method using the prepared samples. In one laboratory, the recovery of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene in sample B was slightly higher at 120%, while the recoveries obtained from the other tests were between 70% and 120%. Relative standard deviation at each laboratory was less than 10%. Furthermore, the relative standard deviations between the validation tests with respect to each chemical were less than 15%. Therefore, the method validated in this study was considered to be effective as a revised method for testing for methanol, trichloroethylene, and trichloroethylene in household aerosol products.