Lung volume reduction surgery 10 years later.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether favorable short-term results in term of functional outcome and survival following lung volume reduction surgery persist for longer periods. Composite preoperative and early postoperative variables were analysed. METHODS: This study was conducted on 52 emphysematous patients who underwent lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) from 1993 to 2000, through a delayed retrospective analysis that has allowed us to evaluate a long-term follow-up (10 years or more); lung function and other variables were considered with respect to survival; 11 patients submitted to lung transplantation were also evaluated. RESULTS: Upper lobe distribution of emphysema (P=0.02, HR:2.43) and systolic PAP (P=0.04, HR=2.11) were significantly correlated to survival in a multivariate analysis; these variables seem to identify a small subgroup of 14 patients with longer survival (more than 10 years). Lung transplantation performed in some worsening patients (mean FEV1%:17±4) showed a trend of better survival when we compared the observed survival (55±47 months) with expected survival (39.5±15 months) (P=ns). CONCLUSION: We conclude that LVRS can lead to a very long survival (10 years or more) in a small subgroup of patients, with improvement of pulmonary functional data. Some preoperative data (upper lobe distribution of emphysema and pulmonary arterial pressure) appear to predict survival. Lung transplantation can be offered to these patients, showing a trend to improved life expectancy.

Lung volume reduction surgery 10 years later.

AIM:The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether favorable short-term results in term of functional outcome and survival following lung volume reduction surgery persist for longer periods. Composite preoperative and early postoperative variables were analysed. METHODS: This study was conducted on 52 emphysematous patients who underwent lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) from 1993 to 2000, through a delayed retrospective analysis that has allowed us to evaluate a long-term follow-up (10 years or more); lung function and other variables were considered with respect to survival; 11 patients submitted to lung transplantation were also evaluated. RESULTS:Upper lobe distribution of emphysema (P=0.02, HR:2.43) and systolic PAP (P=0.04, HR=2.11) were significantly correlated to survival in a multivariate analysis; these variables seem to identify a small subgroup of 14 patients with longer survival (more than 10 years). Lung transplantation performed in some worsening patients (mean FEV1%:17±4) showed a trend of better survival when we compared the observed survival (55±47 months) with expected survival (39.5±15 months) (P=ns). CONCLUSION: We conclude that LVRS can lead to a very long survival (10 years or more) in a small subgroup of patients, with improvement of pulmonary functional data. Some preoperative data (upper lobe distribution of emphysema and pulmonary arterial pressure) appear to predict survival. Lung transplantation can be offered to these patients, showing a trend to improved life expectancy.

Diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by repeated oropharyngeal occlusions occurring during sleep. The prevalence of moderate OSAS (with an apnea-hypopnea index = or >15/h) is 9% and 4% in male and female, respectively. It is associated with an abnormally high frequency of cardiovascular disease (hypertension, stroke, coronary heart disease) and excessive daytime sleepiness responsible for an increased frequency of work and road accidents. Because the treatment of OSAS provides many benefits to patients and society, it is very important to obtain an early diagnosis. The diagnosis of OSAS is based on the combination of characteristic clinical features plus compatible findings on instrumental tests in which multiple physiologic signals are monitored simultaneously during a night of sleep. A full night polysomnography, conducted by a technologist in a sleep laboratory, is the gold standard for the diagnosis of suspected OSAS, but the capacity for performing polysomnography is limited. On the basis of the high incidence and prevalence of OSAS, of the limited number of sleep laboratories, long waiting times and high costs recommendations have been formulated for the use of unattended portable systems in the assessment of OSAS. The main clinical aspects of of OSAS, the diagnostic approach with full night polysomnography and unattended portable systems, the differential diagnosis and some examples of cardiorespiratory portable monitoring are presented in this paper.