An Autopsy Case of Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease Complicated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Severe Pulmonary Hypertension.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory lung disease with obstructed airflow and frequently causes secondary mild-moderate pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, a low proportion (1%-5%) of COPD patients develop severe therapy-resistant PH, and it is crucial to determine whether the patient has another disease capable of causing severe PH, including pulmonary arterial hypertension.Here, we describe a case of a 71-year-old male with COPD complicated by severe PH and right heart failure. He had a history of heavy smoking and developed progressive hypoxemia on exertion. He had severe airflow limitation (forced expiratory volume % in one second, FEV 1.0% = 42.8%) with a markedly reduced diffusing capacity of the lung (predicted diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLCO = 29%), and high-resolution computed tomography (CT) demonstrated significant lung parenchymal abnormalities such as diffuse interlobular septal thickening, ground-glass opacities, and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. He was diagnosed with group 3 PH caused by COPD but resistant to the treatment of COPD, diuretics, and oxygen therapy. Pathohistological analysis of autopsy specimens revealed the coexistence of interstitial fibrosis and partial occlusion of the small intrapulmonary veins, which led to a conclusive diagnosis of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD).Because of its rarity and similarity with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, PVOD is difficult to diagnose antemortem and has a poor prognosis. High-resolution CT findings (septal thickening, ground glass, and enlarged lymph nodes) and severely reduced DLCO should be carefully evaluated for the early detection and treatment of PVOD in COPD patients with severe PH.

Urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein as a useful biomarker in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: We reported that urinary L-FABP reflected the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of urinary liver type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) as a biomarker for monitoring CKD. METHODS: Urinary L-FABP was measured using human L-FABP ELISA kit (CMIC.Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The relations between urinary L-FABP and clinical parameters were evaluated in non-diabetic CKD (n = 48) for a year. In order to evaluate the influence of serum L-FABP derived from liver upon urinary L-FABP, both serum and urinary L-FABP were simultaneously measured in patients with CKD (n = 73). RESULTS: For monitoring CKD, the cut-off value in urinary L-FABP was determined as 17.4 microg/g.cr. by using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Renal function deteriorated significantly more in patients with 'high' urinary L-FABP (n = 36) than in those with 'low' L-FABP (n = 12). The decrease in creatinine clearance was accompanied by an increase in urinary L-FABP, but not in urinary protein. Serum L-FABP in patients with CKD was not correlated with urinary L-FABP. CONCLUSION: Urinary excretion of L-FABP increases with the deterioration of renal function. Serum L-FABP did not influence on urinary L-FABP. Urinary L-FABP may be a useful clinical biomarker for monitoring CKD.

Clinical evaluation of urinary excretion of liver-type fatty acid-binding protein as a marker for the monitoring of chronic kidney disease: a multicenter trial.

To confirm the clinical usefulness of the measurement of urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD), we carried out a multicenter trial. Clinical markers were measured in patients with nondiabetic CKD (n = 48) every 1 to 2 months for a year. We divided patients retrospectively into progression (n = 32) and nonprogression (n = 16) groups on the basis of the rate of disease progression, then assessed several clinical markers. Initially creatinine clearance (Ccr) was similar in the 2 groups; however, the urinary L-FABP level was significantly higher in the former group than in the latter (111.5 vs 53 microg/g creatinine, P < .001). For the monitoring CKD, we set the cutoff values for urinary L-FABP and urinary protein at 17.4 microg/g creatinine and 1.0 g/g creatinine, respectively. Urinary L-FABP was more sensitive than urinary protein in predicting the progression of CKD (93.8% and 68.8%, respectively). However, urinary protein showed greater specificity than did urinary L-FABP (93.8% and 62.5%, respectively). Over time, the progression of CKD tended to correlate with changes in urinary L-FABP (r = - .32, P < .05), but not in urinary protein (r = .18, not significant). The dynamics of urinary protein differed from that of urinary L-FABP, which increased as Ccr declined. Urinary L-FABP is more sensitive than urinary protein in predicting the progression of CKD. Urinary excretion of L-FABP increases with the deterioration of kidney function. Urinary L-FABP is therefore a useful clinical marker in the monitoring of CKD.