Endovascular Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Large Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endovascular thrombectomy has previously been reserved for patients with small to medium acute ischemic strokes. Three recent randomized control trials have demonstrated functional benefit and risk profiles for thrombectomy in large-volume ischemic strokes. The primary objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the combined benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large-volume ischemic strokes and to determine the risk of adverse events after treatment. METHODS: We systematically searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register, and Google Scholar for randomized trials published between January 1, 2010, and February 19, 2023. We included trials specifically comparing endovascular thrombectomy with medical therapy in adults with acute ischemic stroke with large-volume infarctions (defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score 3-5 or a calculated infarct volume of >50 mL). Data were extracted based on prespecified variables on study methods and design, participant characteristics, analysis approach, and efficacy/safety outcomes. Results were combined using a restricted maximum-likelihood estimation random-effects model. Studies were assessed for potential bias and quality of evidence. The primary outcome was an overall ordinal shift across modified Rankin scale scores toward a better outcome at 90 days after either treatment arm. RESULTS: Three thousand forty-four studies were screened, and 29 underwent full-text review. Three randomized trials (N = 1011) were included in the analysis. The pooled random-effects model for the primary outcome favored endovascular thrombectomy over medical management, with a generalized odds ratio of 1.55 (95% CI 1.25-1.91, I 2 = 42.84%). There was a trend toward increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the thrombectomy group, with a relative risk of 1.85 (95% CI 0.94-3.63, I 2 = 0.00%). CONCLUSION: In patients with large-volume ischemic strokes, endovascular thrombectomy has a clear functional benefit and does not confer increased risk of significant complications compared with medical management alone.

Endovascular thrombectomy for the treatment of large ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Importance: Endovascular thrombectomy (ET) has previously been reserved for patients with small to medium acute ischemic strokes. Three recent randomized control trials (RCTs) have demonstrated functional benefit and risk profiles for ET in large volume ischemic strokes. Objective: The primary objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the combined benefit of ET in adult patients with large volume acute ischemic strokes and to better determine the risk of adverse events following ET. Data Sources: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled, and Google Scholar for all RCTs published in English language between January 1, 2010, to February 19, 2023. Study Selection: We included only RCTs specifically comparing ET to medical therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large volume infarctions as defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) 3-5 or calculated infarct volume of > 50-70mL. Two independent reviewers screened potential studies for full text review and metaanalysis inclusion with conflicts being resolved by consensus or third reviewer. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data was extracted based on pre-specified variables on study methods and design, participant characteristics, analysis approach, as well as efficacy and safety outcomes. Results were combined using a restricted maximum-likelihood estimation random-effects model. Studies were assessed for potential bias and quality of evidence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was an overall ordinal shift across the range of modified Rankin scale scores toward a better outcome at 90 days following either ET or medical management for patients with large volume ischemic strokes. Results: A total of 3044 studies were screened, and 29 underwent full text review. 3 RCTs (1011 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled random effects model for the primary outcome of mRS improvement favored ET over medical management, generalized odds ratio 1.55 [95% CI 1.25 - 1.91, T 2 = 0.01, I 2 = 42.84%]. There was a trend toward increased risk of symptomatic ICH in the ET group, relative risk 1.85 [95% CI 0.94 - 3.63, T 2 = 0.00, I 2 = 0.00%]. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with large volume ischemic strokes, ET has a clear functional benefit and does not confer increased risk of significant complications compared to medical management alone.

Flossing technique for endovascular repair of a penetrating cerebrovascular injury: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: A teenage boy who had been stabbed in the neck presented with an extracranial traumatic functional carotid artery occlusion that could not be crossed in an antegrade fashion. Endovascular repair depends on obtaining catheter access proximal and distal to an injury within the true lumen. OBSERVATIONS: The occlusion was treated with flossing technique via the posterior communicating artery. After successful recanalization from a retrograde approach, the carotid artery occlusion was treated with a covered stent. LESSONS: The flossing technique is well established in peripheral vascular disease and may be beneficial in certain cases in the neck vasculature when antegrade access is difficult to obtain. Recanalization of an occluded carotid artery from retrograde approach may be successful in cases of trauma from knife wounds.

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis following Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

A 30-year-old woman with idiopathic intracranial hypertension experienced worsening headaches and decreasing vision in her left eye. She underwent an uncomplicated ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure but the following day was found to have cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Treatment included venous sinus thrombectomy and anticoagulation. She had a favourable clinical outcome. Extensive evaluation including testing for thrombophilia was unremarkable. Potential causes for this rare association are discussed.

An Observational Study Investigating the Need for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy after Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke of the Middle Cerebral Artery Territory.

OBJECTIVE: The frequency incidence of decompressive hemicraniectomy following intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) involving the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory was assessed as a surrogate for morbidity. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted involving 209 consecutive patients between September 2014 and May 2017 with infarctions affecting the MCA territory and who subsequently underwent IAT. The outcomes of interest included the frequency of hemicraniectomy following IAT and the effects of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) use and primary occlusion site on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were excluded for infarctions not involving the MCA territory. A total of 178 patients were included in the study. Sixty-eight patients (38.6%) had infarctions of less than one-third of the MCA territory, 50 (28.4%) had infarctions between one-third and two-thirds, and 58 (33%) had infarctions involving greater than two-thirds with 54.3% suffering infarctions of the left side. Only four patients (2.2%) required a hemicraniectomy with no statistically significant association found between TICI score and hemicraniectomy (p=0.41) or between administration of IV tPA and hemicraniectomy (p=0.36). The primary occlusion site was found to influence TICI score (p=0.045). CONCLUSION: A very small number of patients required hemicraniectomy after IAT as compared to previously published rates in the literature. However, several factors may prevent the patient from being an appropriate hemicraniectomy candidate in the first place and the small number of these patients in this study limits statistical analysis. The variables that determine a patient's candidacy for decompressive hemicraniectomy remains multi-factorial.

Patient Satisfaction in Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

The objective of the study was to establish how patient satisfaction with surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been previously measured, determine whether an ideal patient satisfaction instrument exists, and to define the dimensions of care that determine patient satisfaction with the surgical treatment of PD. A systematic search of four online databases, unpublished sources, and citations was undertaken to identify 15 studies reporting patient satisfaction with the surgical treatment of PD. Manuscripts were reviewed and instruments were categorized by content and method axes. One study was found to utilize two distinct patient satisfaction instruments, which brought the total number of satisfaction instruments assessed to 16. Major factors influencing patient satisfaction were identified and served as a structure to define the dimensions of patient satisfaction in the surgical treatment of PD. Studies used predominantly multidimensional (10/16), rather than global (6/16) satisfaction instruments. Generic (12/16) rather than disease-specific (4/16) instruments were utilized more frequently. Every study reported on satisfaction with outcome and four studies reported on satisfaction with outcome and care. Six dimensions of patient status, outcome and care experience affecting patient satisfaction were identified: motor function, patient-specific health characteristics, programming/long-term care, surgical considerations, device/hardware, and functional independence.  At present, no patient satisfaction instrument exists that is disease-specific and covers all dimensions of patient satisfaction in surgery for PD. For quality improvement, such a disease-specific, comprehensive patient satisfaction instrument should be designed, and, if demonstrated to be reliable and valid, widely implemented.

Transitioning the Treatment Paradigm: How Early Palliative Care Service Involvement Affects the End-of-Life Course for Critically Ill Patients in the Neuro-Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Involvement of the palliative care service has potential for patient and family benefit in critically ill patients, regardless of etiology. Anecdotally, there is a lack of involvement of the palliative care (PC) service in the neuro-intensive care unit (neuro-ICU), and its impact has not been rigorously investigated in this setting. Objective: This study aims at assessing the effect of early involvement of the PC service on end-of-life care in the neuro-ICU. Design: Demographic variables and elements pertaining to the end-of-life care were obtained retrospectively via the electronic medical record from patients receiving their care at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital neuro-ICU. The patient population was divided into two cohorts: patients who received PC services and patients who did not. Contingency analysis was performed to assess for associations with PC service involvement. Results: A total of 149 patients were included in the study. PC services were included in 56.4% of the cases. Involvement of the PC service led to more code status changes to comfort care-do-not-resuscitate p = 0.0021. This was more often a decremental change to less invasive measures rather than a direct change from full code to comfort care measures (p = 0.026). When PC specialists were involved, medications to treat anxiety/agitation, dyspnea/pain, and respiratory secretions were utilized more frequently (p < 0.001) and fewer procedures were performed on these critically ill patients within 48 hours of death (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Early involvement of the PC service has an impact on adjusting the treatment paradigm for patients suffering from devastating neurologic injuries. We recommend the creation of a standardized protocol to ensure early PC consultation in the neuro-ICU based on initial patient presentation parameters, imaging characteristics, and prognosis.

Patient Expectations and Preferences in the Spinal Surgery Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Managing patient expectations is essential in the treatment of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Patient satisfaction is associated with improved clinical outcomes and can be improved when patient and surgeon expectations are aligned and patient preferences are met. METHODS: Patients presenting to clinic for management of spinal disease were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing demographics, current pain, reason for visit, and expectations and preferences surrounding the clinic experience. Variables were compared with χ2 tests to determine factors associated with patient expectations. Subsets of new patients and returning patients were compared by the use of matched pair tests. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare means of clinic expectations in patients depending on their level of education. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were included. New patient evaluation was the most common reason for evaluation (26.6%), and pain relief was the most common chief concern (39.3%). Patients preferred their surgeon wash their hands in the room instead of before entering (P < 0.001) and wear professional attire over scrubs (P < 0.001). Patients believe their wait time will be longer than it should be (P = 0.002), they will spend longer in clinic than they should (P = 0.03), and they will get less face-to-face time with their surgeon than they should (P < 0.01) but also that the surgeon is not getting paid enough for the clinic visit (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Because spine surgery is largely elective, patients often seek treatment to improve quality of life and alleviate subjective symptoms. Understanding patient expectations is critical to ensure that patients and physicians are working toward similar goals.