Anatomical evaluation of the superficial medial collateral ligament distal tibial attachment of the knee.

This study aimed to evaluate the superficial medial collateral ligament distal tibial attachment (sMCL-dTA) morphologically and morphometrically. Seventeen unpaired formalin-fixed cadaveric knees were used. The sMCL was divided into anterior and posterior sections in the paracoronal plane along the midline of the sMCL. The distance from the medial edge of the tibial plateau and the joint line to the proximal margin, center, and distal margin of the sMCL-dTA and the length of the sMCL-dTA were measured in the anterior section, respectively. The sMCL-dTA was histologically observed in the posterior section with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining. The distance from the medial edge of the tibial plateauto the proximal margin, center, and distal margin of the sMCL-dTA were 38.1 ± 4.2, 49.7 ± 4.4, and 61.5 ± 5.1 mm, respectively. The perpendicular distance from the joint line to the proximal margin, center, and distal margin of the sMCL-dTA were 36.1 ± 4.0, 47.4 ± 4.2, and 59.1 ± 4.8 mm, respectively. The length of the sMCL-dTA was 23.6 ± 3.2 mm. Histologically, the sMCL-dTA was formed by two layers of collagen fibers: the unidirectional fibrous layer and the multidirectional fibrous layer. The respective thicknesses of the two layers both decreased distally. The anatomical location, the length, and the attachment morphology of sMCL-dTA have been clarified using human cadaveric knees. Anatomical data in the present study contribute to the quality of surgery associated with sMCL-dTA.

A histology guide for performing human cadaveric studies: SQIP 2024 what to look for with light microscopy.

Histological observation under light microscopy has long been used in human cadaveric studies. However, it can distort the interpretations of findings if not used appropriately; there is no guide for its proper use. The aim of this article is to revisit and discuss the correct use of histology in human cadaveric studies, following discussions with experts in multiple fields of medicine, and to create the first guide for such usage. We reached a consensus with the experts, agreeing that when this principle (structure, quantification, interaction, position: SQIP) is applied to histological observations, the findings will be interpreted correctly. Appropriate use of this recommendation can make human cadaveric studies more accurate and informative. This is the first histology guide for human cadaveric studies.

Evolution of the term "epicondyle of the femur": Revisiting the anatomical and surgical literature.

The femoral epicondyle is an anatomical bony landmark essential for surgeons and anatomists, but there are discrepancies between the two fields when using this term. In current orthopedic surgery, it commonly denotes the small bony prominence of the femoral condyle. Given the derivation, "epicondyle" should be a region projecting laterally from the articular surface rather than a point. These discrepancies in usage are found not only between the fields but also in the literature. This article reviews the narrative definition of "epicondyle of the femur" in surgery and the evolution of the term in anatomy. The outcomes of the review suggest a relationship between the differing perceptions of the epicondyle and the evolution of the term. In reports of studies related to the epicondyle, it is strongly recommended that the definition of the word is clearly stated, with an understanding of its evolution.

Knee extension deficit during gait and knee extensor weakness persisting after saucerization and repair of discoid lateral meniscus tears.

BACKGROUND: Physical function and knee kinematics recovery after discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) tear surgery are essential for a better prognosis. However, these alterations remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate changes in physical function and knee kinematics following saucerization and DLM tear repair. METHODS: We enrolled 16 patients who underwent saucerization and DLM tear repair. Postoperative changes in knee kinematics during gait, and physical function, were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The peak flexion angle of the operated limb during weight acceptance was significantly higher than that of the contralateral limb at 3 (operated limb: 34.6 ± 8.9°, contralateral limb: 23.7 ± 8.3°; P < 0.01) and 6 months (operated limb: 32.1 ± 9.7°, contralateral limb: 24.6 ± 8.2°; P = 0.03) postoperatively, but not at 12 months (operated limb: 27.1 ± 7.1°, contralateral limb: 23.1 ± 9.5°; P = 0.22) postoperatively. The knee extensor strength of the operated limb was significantly lower than that of the contralateral limb at 3 (operated limb: 1.00 ± 0.59 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.37 ± 0.59 Nm/kg; P = 0.01), 6 (operated limb: 1.22 ± 0.55 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.48 ± 0.60 Nm/kg; P < 0.01), and 12 months (operated limb: 1.39 ± 0.57 Nm/kg, contralateral limb: 1.55 ± 0.64 Nm/kg; P = 0.04) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Knee extension deficits and extensor weakness persisted at 6 months after saucerization and repair of DLM tears. Postoperative rehabilitation should be focused on knee extension function.