Diagnostic performance and limitations of magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening endoscopy of early gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Curative treatment of patients with gastric cancer requires reliable detection of early gastric cancer. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) is useful for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of early gastric cancer. However, the role of M-NBI in screening endoscopy has not been established. The aims of this study were to determine the feasibility and limitations of M-NBI in screening endoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective uncontrolled trial of patients undergoing routine screening endoscopy patients. We determined the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of M-NBI according to the degree of certainty and need for biopsy, as assessed using the VS (vessel plus surface) classification system. We analyzed the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of both false negative and false positive high confidence M-NBI diagnoses. We then developed a provisional diagnostic strategy based on the diagnostic performance and limitations identified in this study. RESULTS: A total of 1097 patients were enrolled in the study. We analyzed 371 detected lesions (20 cancers and 351 non-cancers). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high confidence M-NBI diagnoses were 98.1, 85.7 and 99.4 %, respectively. The false negative case was a pale mucosal lesion with tissue diagnosis of signet-ring cell carcinoma. Exclusion of pale mucosal lesions increased the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high confidence M-NBI diagnoses to 99.4, 100 and 99.4 %, respectively. We therefore propose a practical strategy targeting non-pale mucosal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: With a refined strategy considering its limitations, M-NBI can act as an "optical biopsy" in screening endoscopies.

Evaluation of small bowel injury in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by capsule endoscopy: effects of anti-rheumatoid arthritis drugs.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in RA patients who were taking anti-RA drugs with or without concomitant NSAIDs by capsule endoscopy. METHODS: A total of 28 RA patients who took low-dose corticosteroids and/or DMARDs for more than 1 year were enrolled. RESULTS: The incidence of red spots did not differ between the 2 groups: 14 of 16 patients (87.5%) in the NSAID group and 11 of 12 patients (91.7%) in the non-NSAID group. In contrast, the incidence of mucosal breaks was significantly higher in the NSAID group than in the non-NSAID group: mucosal breaks were detected in 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) and 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the NSAID and non-NSAID groups, respectively. In the NSAID group, mucosal breaks developed in users of preferential cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors at a frequency similar to that in users of traditional NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: Patients taking anti-RA drugs may have an increased frequency of small bowel injury regardless of NSAID use, and NSAID use may be associated with an increased incidence of severe small bowel injury.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Stretta procedure in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: first report from Asia.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, various endoscopic treatments have become available to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Western countries. The Stretta procedure, which uses radiofrequency energy, is one type of safe and effective endoluminal treatment for GERD. However, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Stretta procedure in Japanese patients with GERD, who differ from Western peoples in their physiological characteristics, are not known. In 2006, we imported a Stretta system from the United States and investigated important clinical aspects of the system in Japanese patients with GERD. METHODS: This study was an open-label trial that enrolled patients with GERD who desired to undergo the Stretta procedure. Heartburn scores, medication use, overall satisfaction with the procedure, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Nine patients received the Stretta treatment between February and September 2006. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy just after treatment revealed a remarkable reduction in the expansion of the gastric cardia and small erosions in all patients. At 3 or 6 months after treatment, heartburn scores were significantly improved compared with pretreatment scores (5.0 +/- 1.7 pretreatment vs. 0.7 +/- 1.4 posttreatment, P=0.007). In six of nine patients (66.7%), treatment significantly (P=0.009) decreased medication use. There were no major adverse events. All patients were satisfied with this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The Stretta procedure safely reduced GERD symptoms and decreased medication use in Japanese patients with GERD. This treatment may thus be very useful for such patients, and it is hoped that a nationwide trial will be undertaken in Japan to obtain more extensive data.