RESUMO
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) test is one of the most common and traditional laboratory tests in the world. It reflects both plasma concentration of acute-phase proteins of large molecular size and anemia (International Council for Standardization in Hematology, 1993). The ESR test method is easy to perform and inexpensive. Therefore, it is used today as a routine test worldwide. However, the ESR has some demerits, in requiring a large volume of sodium citrate or ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood and at least 2-hour testing time. When ESR is tested manually, incorrect results are obtained if the ESR test tube is not stood strait-up and vertically (Dobashi et al, 1994). Reading error for the meniscus line and surrounding temperature at the testing site cause inaccuracy (Manley, 1957). The 2-hour testing time is not practical for modernized automated laboratories. Its test procedures present the risk of infection from contact with pathogen-bearing blood (Imafuku and Yoshida, 2001). In this context, several kinds of simple, rapid and safe methods have been developed. Of these new systems, we selected 4 and evaluated their performance. This paper reports critical reviews of such devices.
