Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 25(2): 199-206, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complications mean a recurring problem in everyday clinical practice. Complication rates between 6 and 13% are described for the treatment of bony injuries to the head and neck area. This paper aims to provide a detailed analysis of the complications after osteosynthesis in facial skull fractures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this retrospective study, we reviewed all patient records of injured treated in the Department of Cranial and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Dortmund General Hospital between 2015 and 2017. RESULTS: Of the 22,031 head and neck injuries, 685 were treated with osteosynthesis. A clinically significant complication was reported in 32 patients (4.76%). The number of total complications was 63. In total, 66.7% of all complications have been identified in the paramedian mandible (44%), median mandible, mandibular angle, and in the collar area (each 12.7%). Eleven implants (in 5 patients) showed a cancellous bone impaction. Broken implants have been recognized in two cases. In 8 cases, there was a pseudarthrosis in the fracture area; in one case, there was a broken implant and pseudarthrosis in combination. CONCLUSION: Osteosynthesis is a safe method of treating facial skull fractures, which is why we consider it the gold standard of therapy. The complication rate is well below 5%. The 3-dimensional adaptation (bending) and shortening of the osteosynthesis implants do not lead to an increase in complications.


Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Fraturas Cranianas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
2.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 23(3): 307-310, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286292

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Oncological head and neck operations as well as carotid endarterectomy are common surgical procedures. In some occasions, both procedures have occurred in the past, leading to possible diagnostic and therapeutic challenges when follow-up operations seem indicated. CASE REPORT: We report of a patient presenting with carotid endarterectomy including patch operation 8 years ago and neck dissection due to a squamous cell cancer of the tongue 3 months ago, now showing up with a suspected metastatic tumor of the neck during routine follow-up. Intraoperatively, nearly fatal bleeding occurs due to a partial release of the carotid patch and needs to be managed immediately. DISCUSSION: The primarily pre-operated neck remains challenging for the radiologist in terms of differentiating between chronic lymphadenitis and metastasis. Furthermore, it remains challenging for the oncological surgeon in case these entities are in the near proximity of the previously operated carotid artery. The operative treatment according to the guidelines can lead to major bleeding during the second surgery. During the diagnostic process, metastases and chronic lymphadenitis after alloplastic carotid operations must be differentiated remaining however difficult, due to only scarce data in the literature. CONCLUSION: In the case of previous neck surgery, the decision to operate must be chosen individually regarding the specific conditions and their sometimes vital risks. In case an operation is indicated, the team must be trained to treat life-threatening intraoperative bleeding. In reviewing the literature, we were unable to find published recommendations on how to tackle these challenges.


Assuntos
Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Linfadenite , Neoplasias da Língua , Angioplastia , Células Epiteliais , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...