Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
S D Med ; 75(12): 569-572, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893353

RESUMO

Thyroid nodules are exceedingly common in the general population and their increasing incidence appears to be secondary to incidental finding on imaging. Nonetheless, due to the potential for malignancy and thyroid dysfunction, most thyroid nodules require further investigation. Although there are no current guidelines for thyroid cancer screening in asymptomatic patients, a thorough history and physical which focuses on risk factors can serve as a good starting point during the evaluation of a thyroid nodule. This is followed by diagnostic analysis with thyroidstimulating hormone; as well as thyroid scintigraphy, T4, and T3 when indicated. Ultrasound is the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality for suspicious thyroid nodules and can provide further information on malignancy potential and the need for fine need aspiration (FNA). Thyroid nodules can then be further classified on a spectrum ranging from benign to malignant based on a combination of ultrasound and FNA findings. Patients with thyroid nodules that are malignant, suspicious for malignancy, or intermediate lesions should be referred on to a surgeon for potential operative intervention. It is important for primary care providers to be well versed in the work-up and initial evaluation of thyroid nodules as they are often the first provider a patient will present to. This review article serves to refresh and guide the primary care provider through the initial evaluation and management of thyroid nodules.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide , Humanos , Adulto , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Ultrassonografia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
S D Med ; 73(3): 116-121, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142230

RESUMO

Effective postoperative pain control is an essential component for all patients having a surgical procedure. Given the chronicity of care needed by chronic renal failure patients, providing them excellent pain control during their perioperative transplant period is imperative. Different forms of local anesthetics are available and our purpose was to determine whether liposomal bupivacaine reduces post-operative pain levels better than catheter directed administration of 0.25 percent bupivacaine. Secondary objectives included evaluation of differences in total narcotic use and total length of stay. A retrospective chart review of 57 bupivacaine patients and 40 liposomal bupivacaine patients was completed. The patients' reported pain on a 10-point pain scale, narcotic usage and total length of stay were collected. Results showed lower average pain scores on post-operative day 0 for patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine, as well as a fewer narcotics being used on post-operative day 0 and 1. Patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine also had shorter hospital stays by two days. We conclude that liposomal bupivacaine improved pain control and reduced narcotic use in renal transplant patients.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Bupivacaína , Transplante de Rim , Analgésicos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lipossomos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...