Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Coll Health ; : 1-8, 2024 Jan 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227925

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate demand for medication abortion (MAB) among North Carolina (NC) college students and describe access to nearest clinics offering MAB to each campus. METHODS: We calculated demand using 2019-2020 campus demographics and NC abortion statistics. We used a mystery client technique to gather MAB cost and appointment wait times at the closest clinics and calculated travel distances and times. RESULTS: We estimated that 2,517 NC students seek MAB annually. Twenty-one clinics were closest to NC's 111 colleges and universities, including five in neighboring states. Mean cost was $450, with an average wait time of six days to appointment. The average round-trip travel distance was 58 miles and time to the nearest clinic was 84 min by car. CONCLUSIONS: Many NC college students likely obtain MAB every year and face high costs, long wait times and distances to care, which has likely worsened after the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

2.
J Adolesc Health ; 74(2): 367-374, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815761

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19. RESULTS: One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01). DISCUSSION: Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Feminino , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Anticoncepção
3.
Contraception ; 128: 110277, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37659707

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand how adolescents perceive two commonly used contraceptive decision aids and which elements adolescents identified as most important to them. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study of adolescents' perceptions of two decision aids, Your Birth Control Choices designed by the Reproductive Health Access Project and Birth Control: What's Important to You? designed by Power to Decide for Bedsider.org. We conducted semistructured interviews with 20 adolescents (aged 15-19 years) who were assigned female sex at birth and attended a single clinic in North Carolina. Interview questions addressed the decision aids' aesthetic design, informational content, inclusivity, and comprehensibility. We transcribed and analyzed interviews using Dedoose software. We developed a codebook using a combination of a priori and inductive codes followed by content analysis to identify themes. RESULTS: All participants agreed that both decision aids could be helpful with contraceptive decision-making and with patient-provider discussions. However, some phrasing and descriptions of contraceptive methods were confusing. Participants preferred realistic imagery, clear explanations of side effects, and details on method use. Participants expressed a preference for the information contained in the detailed Reproductive Health Access Project decision aid, while most favored the aesthetic design and layout of the Bedsider decision aid. CONCLUSIONS: Although adolescents expressed sentiments of increased knowledge and empowerment after reviewing the decision aids, this study suggests neither decision aid completely meets adolescent needs and preferences. Additional adaptations are necessary to create adolescent-centered contraceptive decision aids. IMPLICATIONS: Adolescents in this study found two contraceptive decision aids as useful adjuncts to conversations with providers. The decision aids improved contraceptive knowledge and may facilitate decision-making. However, neither of the studied decision aids fully met the perceived needs of adolescents. Future adaptations or designs should include additional adolescent-centered content.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Anticoncepcionais , Recém-Nascido , Adolescente , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Anticoncepção/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Comportamento Contraceptivo , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão
4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(7): ofad368, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37520426

RESUMO

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are increasing in the United States, and certain populations are more at risk than others. One explanation for this is inequities in underlying social determinants of health (SDOH). Methods: We analyzed chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis cases in Durham County, North Carolina, from 01/01/2020 to 12/31/2020 by select SDOH at the census tract level. We included 48 variables of interest, including variables related to income, education, transportation, and health insurance. For each variable, we modeled STI incidence at the census tract level using Poisson regression. Wald's chi-square was used to determine which variables were significantly associated with STI incidence. Results: Of 24 variables that were statistically associated with STI incidence at the census tract level, 9 were negatively associated and 15 positively associated with STI incidence. Having employer health insurance was most strongly associated with lower-than-expected STI incidence, and having Medicaid insurance, no health insurance, using public transportation, and income below the poverty level were most strongly associated with higher-than-expected STI incidence. Lastly, STI incidence was not associated with race or ethnicity overall across Durham County, except in historically marginalized areas, where we found higher-than-expected STI incidence. Conclusions: We found that lacking health insurance, having Medicaid insurance, using public transportation, and income below the poverty level were most strongly associated with higher-than-expected STI incidence. Strategies to combat increasing STIs may include improving access to health insurance, reducing barriers to cost-effective and timely transportation to medical appointments, and raising wages to bring individuals out of poverty.

5.
Contraception ; 123: 110009, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931546

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify patient and practice characteristics associated with single-visit placement of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) across the University of North Carolina Health system. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational study using existing electronic health records. We abstracted data from charts of individuals ages 15-50 years who received a LARC device between March 15, 2019, and March 14, 2021. Our primary outcome was whether a patient received LARC at one, or after multiple, outpatient visits. We used descriptive statistics to examine patient, clinician, and practice characteristics. We used bivariate analysis and generalized estimating equation to examine relationships between characteristics and single-visit LARC receipt. RESULTS: Most of the 4599 individuals received care at obstetrics and gynecology clinics (3411/4599; 74%), and received their LARC device in a single visit (3163/4599; 69%). More intrauterine devices (3151) were placed than implants (1448). The adjusted odds of receiving a LARC in a single visit was highest for those who self-paid (aOR (adjusted odds ratio) 1.83, 1.19-2.82) and those who received an implant (aOR 1.25, 1.07-1.46). Patients seen by advanced practice practitioners (aOR 0.67, 0.56-0.80) or by an internal medicine specialty clinician (aOR 0.13, 0.00-0.35) had lower odds of receiving a single-visit LARC compared to those seen by a specialist obstetrician-gynecologist physician. CONCLUSION: Most single-visit LARC placements were performed by clinicians in obstetrician-gynecologist specialty practices. IMPLICATIONS: Among individuals seeking long-acting reversible contraceptives from clinics in a single health system in North Carolina, most received a device at a single visit and most single-visit insertions were done by an obstetrician-gynecologist.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo , Obstetrícia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoal de Saúde , Anticoncepção
6.
BMJ Glob Health ; 7(1)2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012970

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has heterogeneously affected use of basic health services worldwide, with disruptions in some countries beginning in the early stages of the emergency in March 2020. These disruptions have occurred on both the supply and demand sides of healthcare, and have often been related to resource shortages to provide care and lower patient turnout associated with mobility restrictions and fear of contracting COVID-19 at facilities. In this paper, we assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of maternal health services using a time series modelling approach developed to monitor health service use during the pandemic using routinely collected health information systems data. We focus on data from 37 non-governmental organisation-supported health facilities in Haiti, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mexico and Sierra Leone. Overall, our analyses indicate significant declines in first antenatal care visits in Haiti (18% drop) and Sierra Leone (32% drop) and facility-based deliveries in all countries except Malawi from March to December 2020. Different strategies were adopted to maintain continuity of maternal health services, including communication campaigns, continuity of community health worker services, human resource capacity building to ensure compliance with international and national guidelines for front-line health workers, adapting spaces for safe distancing and ensuring the availability of personal protective equipment. We employ a local lens, providing prepandemic context and reporting results and strategies by country, to highlight the importance of developing context-specific interventions to design effective mitigation strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...