Fetal Third-Trimester Functional Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Neonatal Elevated Bilirubin Level.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the neonatal outcomes of fetuses with diagnosed functional cardiovascular abnormalities, also considering the connection with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an observational study of 100 neonates who had fetal echocardiography examinations in the third trimester (mean gestational age during the last echocardiography was 34 ± 3 weeks and mean birth weight was 3550 g). There were two groups: A: normal heart anatomy + no functional anomalies; group B: normal heart anatomy + functional abnormalities. Hyperbilirubinemia was defined as a bilirubin level of >10 mg%. RESULTS: In group A, there were 72 cases and only 5 cases despite having normal heart anatomy and normal heart study that presented additional problems. In group B (28 cases), the prenatal functional findings included tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (15 cases, 53%), pericardial effusion (4 cases, 14%), myocardial hypertrophy (4 cases, 14%), cardiomegaly (2 cases, 7%), abnormal bidirectional blood flow across the foramen ovale (3 cases, 11%), aneurysm of atrial septum (2 case, 7%), abnormal E/A ratio for mitral and tricuspid valve (1 case, 3%), bright spot (3 case, 11%), abnormal Doppler flow in ductus arteriosus compared to aortic arch (difference >60 cm/s) (1 case, 3%), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (1 case), and mitral regurgitation (1 case, 3%). In group A (n = 72 cases), bilirubin levels of >10 mg/dL were observed in 8% of newborns. In group B (n = 28), bilirubin levels of > 10 m/dL were observed in 46% of cases and TR was present in group B in 53% of cases (15/28 cases). The difference between group A and B in terms of elevated bilirubin levels was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of fetal normal heart anatomy and normal heart study, a good neonatal outcome may be expected. When fetal cardiovascular functional abnormalities in normal heart anatomy are detected, with special attention paid to tricuspid valve regurgitation, a neonatal elevated bilirubin level (mean 11 mg/dL, range 10-15 mg/dL) may be expected.

Renin, Aldosterone, and Cortisol in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess renin, aldosterone, and cortisol in the early stages of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), i. e., at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: During the postural test, we measured aldosterone, renin [Liason DiaSorin Inc. (Italy)], as well as cortisol, sodium, potassium, and 24-h urinary sodium and potassium excretion in 62 women with newly diagnosed PIH, 70 healthy women during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, and in 22 healthy non-pregnant women. RESULTS: In all groups, there was a significant increase in aldosterone and renin in upright versus supine posture (p<0.01). Both supine and upright aldosterone concentrations were higher in healthy pregnant women than in women with PIH and the lowest in healthy not-pregnant [supine (median±intequartile range): 25.04±18.4 ng/dL, 18.03±12.58 ng/dL, and 7.48±4.78 ng/dL, p<0.001, upright: 31.60±21.32 ng/dL, 25.11±13.15 ng/dL, and 12.4±12.4 ng/dL, p<0.001, for healthy pregnant, pregnant with PIH, and non-pregnant, respectively]. Supine renin concentrations were higher only in healthy pregnant (p<0.001), while in the upright position, there was a difference only between healthy pregnant and women with PIH (p=0.002). Both in supine and upright positions, there was no difference in the aldosterone-to-renin ratio between healthy pregnant women and women with PIH, though, in both groups, the ratio was higher than in non-pregnant women (p<0.001). Morning cortisol concentrations and 24-h urinary sodium excretion were lower in women with PIH than in healthy pregnant (p<0.001, p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hyperaldosteronism is not involved in the etiology of PIH. In PIH, there is also a tendency towards lower sodium excretion and lower morning cortisol concentrations.

The Causes and Role of Antinatalism in Poland in the Context of Climate Change, Obstetric Care, and Mental Health.

Antinatalism is an umbrella term for numerous moral dilemmas associated with procreation. In the past few years, the deterioration of environmental conditions, social difficulties, global worsening of people's mental health, and pandemics have induced discussion about antinatalism. Therefore, we aimed to characterize antinatalists in the Polish population in terms of the frequency and description of the main reasons behind this phenomenon. The cross-sectional study was performed in the Polish population. An online, four-part survey was performed between 19 and 25 January 2022. The study group comprised 1240 respondents. Antinatalists (n = 472, 38%) were defined as people who do not have children and want to be childless in the future, whereas pronatalists (n = 768, 62%) consisted of people who want to have offspring in the future and/or already have children. The opinion that climate change is a significant reason not to have a child appeared twice as often among antinatalists. Additionally, the performed binary logistic regression model highlighted the importance of the fear of climate change as an independent factor facilitating an antinatalistic attitude. Regarding females, the following factors discouraging them from having a child were observed: fear of child's congenital diseases, pregnancy complications, dissatisfaction with medical services, and fear of exacerbation of maternal chronic diseases. Anxiety, depression, and stress were not found to be statistically different between pro- and antinatalist groups. However, further analysis revealed that female antinatalists were significantly more depressive and anxious. Our study helps us to understand why, as mentioned beforehand, around 38% of respondents prefer to stay childless. In conclusion, antinatalism views have become relatively prevalent in society, and its reasons include environmental antinatalism and medical factors, including depression and anxiety. However, better access to medical services and changes in climate politics were not found to be significant factors in encouraging society to decide to have offspring.

Establishing Reference Ranges for Aldosterone, Renin and Aldosterone-to-Renin Ratio for Women in the Third-Trimester of Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism in pregnancy is complicated due to lack of reference ranges for aldosterone, renin and aldosterone-to-renin ratio. We have endeavoured to establish third-trimester reference ranges for the above-mentioned parameters. DESIGN & PATIENTS: We performed postural tests for aldosterone and renin (chemiluminescence immunoassay Liason® DiaSorin Inc., Italy) in 70 healthy pregnant women (age 30.53±4.51 years), at 32.38±4.25 weeks of gestation and in 22 non-pregnant healthy women (age 33.08±8.72 years). RESULTS: Aldosterone reference ranges were 6.51-73.97 ng/dl and 12.33-86.38 ng/dl, for supine and upright positions, respectively and that for renin were 6.25-59.36 µIU/ml and 11.12-82.55 µIU/ml, respectively. Aldosterone and renin concentrations were higher in an upright position (p=0.000459 and p=0.00011, respectively). In contrast, aldosterone-to-renin ratio was not affected by posture (i. e. 0.497-3.084 ng/dl/µIU/ml versus 0.457-3.06 ng/dl/µIU/ml, p=0.12), but was higher (p=0.00081) than in non-pregnant controls. In comparison to manufacturer-provided non-pregnant reference range, supine aldosterone concentrations increased by 556% (lower cut-off) and 313% (upper cut-off), while upright aldosterone concentrations increased by 558% (lower cut-off) and 244% (upper cut-off). The reference range for supine renin concentrations increased by 223% (lower cut-off) and 48.7% (upper cut-off), while upright renin concentrations increased by 253% (lower cut-off) and 79% (upper cut-off). CONCLUSIONS: There is an upward shift in aldosterone and renin reference ranges in the third-trimester of pregnancy accompanied by an increase in an aldosterone-to-renin ratio, that is not influenced by posture. It remains to be established whether the aldosterone-to-renin ratio may be used as a screening tool for primary hyperaldosteronism in pregnancy.