Predictors of the Overall Survival with Azacitidine Monotherapy in Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Ineligible for Intensive Therapy.

Objective The prognostic factors for azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive therapy remain unknown. To identify prognostic factors for azacitidine monotherapy and assist clinicians in deciding whether to use azacitidine monotherapy or other therapies. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients with AML who were newly treated with azacitidine between 2013 and 2021 at our hospital. We evaluated potential predictors based on the overall survival (OS). Results A univariate analysis found that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 and platelet count (Plt) <27,000/µL had a significant negative influence on the OS. A multivariate analysis confirmed that both factors had significant independent adverse effects on the OS. An ECOG PS ≥2 and Plt <27,000/µL were thus assigned 1 point each, and a clinical scoring system was created. Log-rank testing showed that the 0-point group (n=12) had a median OS of 680 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 220-898 days] and a 1-year OS rate of 80.8% (95% CI 42.3-94.9%), the 1-point group (n=11) had a median OS of 90 days (95% CI 62-345 days) and a 1-year OS rate of 18.2% (95% CI 2.9-44.2%), and the 2-point group (n=4) had a median OS of 82 days [95% CI 19-not applicable (NA) days] and a 1-year OS rate of 0% (95% CI NA-NA). The p value of 0.00008 indicated that this scoring was useful. Conclusion The ECOG PS and Plt can be used to predict the OS with azacitidine monotherapy in untreated AML patients ineligible for intensive therapy.

Successful treatment with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Transplant-eligible patients with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome are treated with induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Conventional induction therapies may exacerbate neuropathy and a high rate of disease progression within 5 years. Furthermore, only 50% of patients are able to walk independently after the therapies. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy has been reported as a less neurotoxic, highly effective therapy for patients with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome who are ineligible for transplant or whose syndrome is relapsed/refractory, but no reports have provided data from untreated transplant-eligible patients. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old Japanese woman displayed weakness, pain and edema in the lower limbs, decreased grip strength, amenorrhea, and abdominal distention. She was unable to walk independently. The patient was diagnosed with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome and performed four courses of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy, which enabled her to walk independently and did not exacerbate the neuropathy. Hematopoietic stem cells were collected using plerixafor and filgrastim in combination. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed with high-dose melphalan. At 3-month post-transplantation follow-up, most of her clinical symptoms had disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation may be more effective than conventional therapy for newly diagnosed polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M-protein, skin changes syndrome. Although there was concerns that daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy might lead to poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells, this was overcome with the combination of plerixafor and filgrastim. The benefit of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation should be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Addition of plerixafor for mobilization of stem cells with bortezomib is feasible in dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma.

Plerixafor and bortezomib have recently been used in autologous stem cell collection to increase the amount of stem cells collected. However, no reports have described the combined use of plerixafor and bortezomib in cases of dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma. The dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma patient in the present study had a small amount of CD34-positive cells with plerixafor and filgrastim, and also with bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. However, by adding plerixafor to bortezomib and cyclophosphamide, collected CD34-positive cells were increased six-fold compared to the previous day. These findings suggest that the combination of plerixafor and bortezomib may be effective in those patients.